• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Stingray Classic Returns

This is preferable to the Classic because it has a regular maple neck. I had a Classic whose neck warped, and when I took it to Mike Lull (RIP) he told me it was best to avoid figured maple because it's weaker and less likely to hold up long term.

Pshaw. I have two Rays with birdseye maple (~1994 and 2010) and they have zero problems.

The hollow bridge barrels give me pause because you can run out of adjustment with those. They can't go as low as the solid barrel ones.

I agree with that potential problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dasgre0g
The StingRay Classic, Old Smoothie, and this new 70's Retro model have epoxy dolloped on the preamp.

There's no magic in the epoxy.
Is it true the Classic also had epoxy on the preamp?
I can't see where it says the new 70's Retro has epoxy either?
I'm actually glad my 1980 Ray doesn't have epoxy which would make a repair impossible.
Maple on natural ash was my first Stingray and still my favourite combination.
20230824_234618.png

20230727_232638.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Murch and ics1974
I bought one (new) in '95 for $849. Seemed totally affordable back then.

As a teenager, it seemed borderline prohibitively expensive (those were the days).

The only kids I knew who had brand new ones, we're spoiled brats whose parents indulged their every whim.

The only adults I knew who owned brand new ones were either professional musicians with a record deal, or dedicated weekend warriors with good day jobs.

FWIW, here in the UK, the price was the same figure in Sterling, as it was in U.S. Dollars, but Sterling was about twice the value of the Dollar - so StingRays were effectively twice as expensive here, than in America.
 
To be clear: I am not criticizing EBMM for their pricing. They are a small company paying highly skilled luthiers a living wage and using expensive materials to build basses to a high standard. I don’t think the price point is unreasonable in our current economy given the quality of the product; it’s just not an expense I could justify.

This is a very fair and valid point. Economic factors affect us all. If EBMM needs to raise prices so their skilled craftsmen living in an expensive part of the country (median sold home price in San Luis Obispo County is around $825k) can make a living wage, I totally get it. I will never begrudge a company for paying its people fairly because many do not. On other side of that coin, the average consumer 2000 miles away in the Midwest may have a harder time justifying the expense, but I guess that's just the world we live in. I personally am not really that invested in vintage and vintage-period-correct stuff... I recently sold my Stingray Classic (absolutely impeccable bass, by the way) because gloss necks don't feel right to me. But then I bought a 2010 HH Stingray here on Talkbass at a reasonable used price and it's my favorite of the 8 or so 'Rays I've owned.
 
Is it true the Classic also had epoxy on the preamp?
I can't see where it says the new 70's Retro has epoxy either?
I'm actually glad my 1980 Ray doesn't have epoxy which would make a repair impossible.
Maple on natural ash was my first Stingray and still my favourite combination.
View attachment 5236975
View attachment 5236978


Yep, the "Classic" has epoxy.

The BFR '76 had it too.

I thought I'd read somewhere that these new 70's Retro models do, but given the attention to period detail they've gone to; it's almost impossible that they wouldn't.

I agree, it was a crude method of copyright protection, and I don't miss it.

Love me some natural finish StingRay.
 
It can't any more confusing than 7ender...
Going by those video, apparently, this bass is only good for slapping. If so, hard pass (I can't slap my way out of a hole).
I hear ya - if I were to get another 'Ray it's because I want to sound like Paul Denman, or Carl Radle, or....the list goes on. I don't play any music that requires slapping. Would be kinda nice to hear how it actually sounds...not slapped. Briefly had a 3-band that I didn't vibe with, but always wanted to try a 2-band. Love the natural.
 
Last edited:
Pshaw. I have two Rays with birdseye maple (~1994 and 2010) and they have zero problems.

That's great I'm glad, I hope you never have that issue. But still, two anecdotal examples of a problem not happening doesn't mean that the problem doesn't exist. The people who I've heard this from are fairly experienced and reputable, and I've made it a point to ask around about it because I myself had to deal with it. It's a chance, not a certainty. Most will never have a problem. I just like to have the best odds possible when I buy a bass.