• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

stoner/doom bassist thread part 2: suspicious smoke

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lazarus.Bird said:
Well now that I have a passive bass maybe I'll be a bit more interested, however as I always use chromes I don't think a pedal obsession is in my future. I wouldn't mind getting a delay, POG, and possibly a better chorus pedal though.

Funny enough the Ox Fuzz was one of the few pedals that worked well with flats, the Rat Tail on the other hand did not, it sounded terrible with flats in my opinion and I sold it after one practice.
 
bassboysam said:
Funny enough the Ox Fuzz was one of the few pedals that worked well with flats, the Rat Tail on the other hand did not, it sounded terrible with flats in my opinion and I sold it after one practice.

That's exactly what I'm talking about. A ped can sound awesome for one person or in a clip but the second you get it home, you want to throw it in the trash, LOL
 
I'm trying to get into effects. I ran clean with my last band. Well, as clean as old Acoustics can be. I just joined a band that used a tube screamer on their EP so I'm gonna go that route for now but I plan to build something for myself (I got the DIY bug).

EDIT: Here is the band I just joined:

Link Removed

We had one practice so far where we just watched Red Fang videos and listened to Primus. This'll be a good fit for me.

The music leans a little to the metal side but I think there are plenty of meaty riffs.

Why does every one these days have to mess up music with those horrible screams and that fake ass devil voice?
 
Counting the days until I get my bonus check in November. I think I plan on buying a Traynor YBA300. I don't suppose anyone here has played one yet?

only the YBA-200, and it was OK but it was lacking a little oomph. I thought it was great until I tried a Fender 300 PRO, that made the Traynor seem like a toy. even at the same volume level the 300 PRO always sounded like their was weight behind each note, the YBA-200 not so much. I am not convinced the YBA-300 is much better. seems too complicated, and I am not a fan of EL34's for bass. having said that I have not tried the YBA-300 yet and it could be a completely different animal.
 
Someone is going to make me spit my soup all over my keyboard.

also, basically my friend bought me a used bass big muff for helping him fix his car. He gave me money that I didn't have and I found one for $55 used. No sense saving it towards something else because I won't get anymore money til X-mas. Then, It's Lodestone time.
 
only the YBA-200, and it was OK but it was lacking a little oomph. I thought it was great until I tried a Fender 300 PRO, that made the Traynor seem like a toy. even at the same volume level the 300 PRO always sounded like their was weight behind each note, the YBA-200 not so much. I am not convinced the YBA-300 is much better. seems too complicated, and I am not a fan of EL34's for bass. having said that I have not tried the YBA-300 yet and it could be a completely different animal.

I owned a YBA200 for awhile. Awesome amp but broke up too easily before I reached the volumes I wanted. I've been following the YBA300 thread and it seems like a different beast than the YBA200. People are raving about it. Supposed to be on par with an SVT with that kick you in the balls ability. What about it do you think is complicated? It looks to be the easiest to use by the end user tube amp I've ever seen. It will also work with 6L6s isntead of the EL34s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.