TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Engineering for different users?Anyone know why these two brands sound so different from each other?
I was at Sam Ash yesterday and played an Ampeg 1x10 combo. It was only the second time that played through an Ampeg. It has the sounds that I hear my head as a fat tone. It doesn't have an XLR or 1/4" jack line-out. The previous Ampeg was a 1x12 combo. They both have similar tones and features.
I intend to sell my Rumble or trade it for an Ampeg. I tried getting similar tones out my Rumble, but it can't do it. Anyone know why these two brands sound so different from each other?
There was one in the classifieds a few days back at a good discount. A great choice.I just replaced my Rumble 100 with a GK Fusion 210 combo. I got it for $1500. All tube preamp, 400 watts with built in cab, 800 with extension. Sounds amazing
I currently own Rocket bass 112 and been own those 2000 bassman 25 , Rumble V1 100/210, V2 75/112 and V3 200/150.
RB112 has heft tone that missing on Rumble. The SGT mode work better efficient than Overdrive on Rumble. Once engage, SGT tight up, heft up, compress up ..... what ever... she just give me useful overdrive Tube-ist result to me.
But , RB112 can't dial that Fender bake-in tone which has sweeter zing/top end on Rumble 200/115 with bright button engage + Horn ON.
These look nice.I have. I got into recording about a year ago and still going through learning curves. I eventually want to make the process as streamlined and uniform as possible to lessen variables.
I like the low floor noise and ease of line-out. However, I do think capturing with a mic/mixer/recorder provides the best sound.
I was at Sam Ash yesterday and played an Ampeg 1x10 combo. It was only the second time that played through an Ampeg. It has the sounds that I hear my head as a fat tone. It doesn't have an XLR or 1/4" jack line-out. The previous Ampeg was a 1x12 combo. They both have similar tones and features.
I intend to sell my Rumble or trade it for an Ampeg. I tried getting similar tones out my Rumble, but it can't do it. Anyone know why these two brands sound so different from each other?
Very good analysis and pretty much on par with my thoughts about the two. Knowing more now than I did at the time certainly helps narrow the focus of the tones I want when recording my songs. My style of music leans more towards what Ampeg is putting out.
It’s a company’s signature to separate their sound from their competitors. Imagine if they all sounded the same? It’s ruin the hobby, though save me a bunch of money!
I've owned a few Rumbles and while they’re super popular, my ear doesn’t like them. Too muddy where the notes all sound similar, but that’s the proof how subjective it is; what you may love another bass player may not stand. BTW, going with Ampeg is a brilliant choice!
Thanks for the reply. I am aware of the reasons for company's to have a distinct sound, but these two are polar opposites that barely cross paths at any point at any settings combinations. My guess is it might be more about the cabinet/speaker design than the amp. I've built a few tube guitar amps and imo what separates amp tone (not speaker/cab influence) is design for built-in compression and gain staging. Otherwise at clean volumes a lot of amps/combos can sound very similar or capable to achieve similarities amongst each other.
That's the only amp I have right now. Works fine for my music room at home. I use it with my Broughton HPF and Keeley Bassist. Definitely gets loud enough for my needs without stressing out the speaker.I purchased a used Ampeg BA-108 for $70 today. Sounds better than the Rumble.
I'm intrigued. Got link to any post(s) expanding on this concept? (The Rumble Club is a yuuuuge thread!)Have you tried no Gain and very little Bass, and then tweaked the mids to get a sound you like?