TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
If your entertainment doesnt put meat in the seats and sell drinks it isn't worth paying for.I've played there a couple of times as a "hired gun" and got a set fee regardless of whatever the band took in...but I won't consider playing for "the door" there or anywhere else. I'm not gonna subsidize any proprietor and provide free entertainment for their establishment.
I went to the Whisky-a-Go-Go over and over last year to see shows by bands I really wanted to see (Fates Warning, Insomnium, Loudness, Marty Friedman, Prong), all the while knowing it was a P2P venue. My New Year's Resolution this year is to stop going to shows at P2P venues, regardless of how badly I want to see them.I'm in a local band in Atlanta. All originals. We say no to all pay to play schemes, so do all the other bands we know. We don't support pay to play shows by attending. In my opinion that's how you beat them.
Pay to play? is that an american thing?
If you are going to P2P, pay yourself.rent a theater on a dark or slow night and put on their own show
If your entertainment doesnt put meat in the seats and sell drinks it isn't worth paying for.
A couple of points: A bar without live entertainment is unlikely to have people stick around for a few hours...
Most people want to hear music they know.....
Opening for a big band could also mean that you have the first slot among 4 opening acts, which means you are paying to put on your resume that you opened up for "xxx" while not getting the exposure for opening up for "xxx".That's why I'll never book pay to play, unless its opening for a big band.
It's my opinion that the period of approx. 1920-1980, when it was possible for a significant number of people to make reasonable money playing live popular music, is an anomaly in human history, which existed for a number of reasons, and which may not re-occur.
Sorry to be Debbie Downer, but I just see an ever-increasing supply of musicians and an ever-decreasing demand for their services. And every year, the universities and music schools crank out an accelerating number of hot young players who can outplay most of us.
Another trend I've seen happen in pay to play, is that these venues don't seem to care whether the bands actually bring the heads, they only care about the money.
Based on the headlining acts that I see at P2P venues, I wonder what the P2P clubs would do if they had to pay the headliner's guarantee by selling their own tickets and selling booze to only their fans...the "unless it's for a big band" caveat is part of the problem too.
I went to the Whisky-a-Go-Go over and over last year to see shows by bands I really wanted to see (Fates Warning, Insomnium, Loudness, Marty Friedman, Prong), all the while knowing it was a P2P venue. My New Year's Resolution this year is to stop going to shows at P2P venues, regardless of how badly I want to see them.
I have also started emailing or messaging the bands social media accounts telling them that I am interested in seeing them but will not attend shows at P2P venues. When I have gotten responses at all, it's been "We don't control where we get booked" and/or "There are no venues in your area suitable for our draw that are not P2P".
Based on the headlining acts that I see at P2P venues, I wonder what the P2P clubs would do if they had to pay the headliner's guarantee by selling their own tickets and selling booze to only their fans...
I wouldn't be surprised if some of those headliners really weren't making the club money either.
I also wouldn't be surprised that in some cases that they may find without the local bands, the headliner has no draw.
Based on the headlining acts that I see at P2P venues, I wonder what the P2P clubs would do if they had to pay the headliner's guarantee by selling their own tickets and selling booze to only their fans...
I wouldn't be surprised if some of those headliners really weren't making the club money either.
I also wouldn't be surprised that in some cases that they may find without the local bands, the headliner has no draw.
yes, absolutely.So it's better to boycott the venue and hurt the band??
Just how does it hurt the band?So it's better to boycott the venue and hurt the band??