• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

TC Electronic BG250 Club (Part 2)

Yes I should try that.
But I have to find a trick regarding the grill : there's some paste behind it to prevent it from vibrations. And I don't want to put that paste all around.
And aren't there some risks for the speaker when pluging the ports ?

Regarding the 2kHz bump I think it's more due to the speaker itself. It seems very common with the 15".
When I made my tests with a pink noise, even if the results weren't great to analyse, there's a big gap at 5 KhZ, so I guess the tweeter is set to player the higher frequencies.
 
Hi, I'm considering getting a BG250 amp, but I have a few questions. One is how reliable are they? Are they an amp that you can use time and time again? Second question is is there a significant difference in max volume and sound quality between the 115 and 210? I know there are both 250 watts but I don't know of speaker size would make a difference because of the number in watts( you can really tell I'm a noob). Any help is appreciated, thanks.
 
Hi, I'm considering getting a BG250 amp, but I have a few questions. One is how reliable are they? Are they an amp that you can use time and time again? Second question is is there a significant difference in max volume and sound quality between the 115 and 210? I know there are both 250 watts but I don't know of speaker size would make a difference because of the number in watts( you can really tell I'm a noob). Any help is appreciated, thanks.

"How reliable?" - Not intending to seem overly-dismissive or abrasive, but no one here can tell you whether or not you'll get a lemon. The chance of getting a lemon is there with any amp. Some people do try to gauge their chances by user reported failures on forums, but the take-away from doing that can be deceptive. The bottom line is that some BG250 buyers have gotten lemons, there vast majority have not.

"Max volume difference between the 210 and 115?" - There is some anecdotal suggestion that the 210 can get some amount louder than the 115. That difference could only be of any significance if one wasn't loud enough and the difference of the other made it loud enough. IMO, if there actually is a difference between their max volume, it's unlikely to have any meaning to 99.99% of buyers. The reason is that you rarely hear of people needing to run their amp at or very near max (at least with any regularity). Someone who were to find that they regularly had to crank their amp to its max volume would probably decide that it's not loud enough. Someone who finds either the BG250-115 or BG250-210 doesn't work for them because of not being loud enough for their use is probably going to find that the same is true of both. It's not like a 3 bears proposition where this one's not loud enough, but this one (that's only slightly different) is just right.

I've compared them, and the primary difference I found was some difference in how the mids are treated. That difference is probably not too far outside of the ability of EQ to deal with. The 115 seems to have an inherent midrange quality that some find as a less than desirable nasal/honky undertone. Others either don't notice that same quality or find it pleasant or something that adds to the "vintage" type sound they're going after.
 
"How reliable?" - Not intending to seem overly-dismissive or abrasive, but no one here can tell you whether or not you'll get a lemon. The chance of getting a lemon is there with any amp. Some people do try to gauge their chances by user reported failures on forums, but the take-away from doing that can be deceptive. The bottom line is that some BG250 buyers have gotten lemons, there vast majority have not.

"Max volume difference between the 210 and 115?" - There is some anecdotal suggestion that the 210 can get some amount louder than the 115. That difference could only be of any significance if one wasn't loud enough and the difference of the other made it loud enough. IMO, if there actually is a difference between their max volume, it's unlikely to have any meaning to 99.99% of buyers. The reason is that you rarely hear of people needing to run their amp at or very near max (at least with any regularity). Someone who were to find that they regularly had to crank their amp to its max volume would probably decide that it's not loud enough. Someone who finds either the BG250-115 or BG250-210 doesn't work for them because of not being loud enough for their use is probably going to find that the same is true of both. It's not like a 3 bears proposition where this one's not loud enough, but this one (that's only slightly different) is just right.

I've compared them, and the primary difference I found was some difference in how the mids are treated. That difference is probably not too far outside of the ability of EQ to deal with. The 115 seems to have an inherent midrange quality that some find as a less than desirable nasal/honky undertone. Others either don't notice that same quality or find it pleasant or something that adds to the "vintage" type sound they're going after.
Thank you! :)
 
Just an update from a BG250 (original 115) owner:
Unfortunately I have pretty much relegated my BG to practice amp duty. The only way I can get rid of the unpleasant (to me) midrange "honk" is to run a Tech 21 Paradriver in front of it. Even with all of the Paradriver controls centered at 12:00 it still makes a world of difference in the tone. Also I find I have to tighten the screws on the side of the amp that hold the head in pretty often or I get a nasty rattle. I still think this is a good amp for the money though. If you run something in front of it that has some EQ it will probably be fine. I started gigging with a GK MB500 Fusion into an Avatar B212 Neo cab - while an apples to oranges comparison (price point among other things), that rig sounds WAY better.
Note I have never heard the 112, 210, or 208 versions. My hunch is that the tone issue I have with the 115 is the speaker/enclosure, not the amplifier characteristics.
 
I am too a 115 owner and didn't have any issue since I use it (one year and a half I think, daily use).
Regarding the tone I agree with DrPepper and Tbirdsp : its tone is very middy. You may like it or not.
It's due to the speaker/enclosure for sure. The amp by itself is very flat.
I too use a preamp in front of it to get a tone I like much (VT Bass in my case). But, really, tone is very subjective.
The fact is that many bass speakers tend to cut a certain amount of mids. This one, no.
It can be convenient in a very busy mix (you don't have to push the mids, they're already there). But it can also sound a bit raw in certain circumstances.
From what I heard the 210 has some kind of mid scoop, so a sweeter tone. But I never tried it.

Regarding the volume, I find it to be very powerful. I never pushed it more than 5 or 6 on the master.

The problem with tone is that everyone has his own idea of what is a good tone, so it's hard to know what will work for the other ones, especially in a band mix :)

But at that price and that weight this combo is very interesting and convenient.
 
The problem with tone is that everyone has his own idea of what is a good tone, so it's hard to know what will work for the other ones, especially in a band mix :)

This is a good point. Also, the "nasal" quality disappears in a band setting, for me.

It's posted back in the thread a couple of times, but here it is again...

 
Last edited:
Hello, just to do some following to my previous posts regarding the BG250-115 tone which could be too boomy for my personal tastes : the trick to cut a bit at 100 Hz with an external eq really worked well.
I didn't feel the need to use a boost in the 50/60Hz as I thought.
In a band context, this simple trick worked very well. Even my bandmates (who don't follow all my eq obsessions) noticed that our tone was really better than usual.
It's simple but it requires an external parametric eq to cut in this area without removing all the low end. I wasn't able to achieve that with the Bass knob of the BG250 : the cut is too wide and it let me with a very thin sound.
Parametric Eq is my new best friend :)
 
Just picked up a used BG250 today in new condition. Pretty light and sounds pretty good. I haven't cranked it yet...apartment living.

I did have a question about the TonePrint app on iPhone. Will any of the other TonePrint effects work on the amp besides the one labeled 'BG250'?

Edit: figured it out
 
Last edited:
Hi all,
I posted the answer below into http://www.talkbass.com/threads/bg250-208.1112110/ - question about whether the BG250 208 could hack it in a live jazz environment. Thought that it might be of interest to the wider (not in the context of too many pies consumed of course) BG250 audience. Anyway my 2p /2c worth on the subject.

I'll jump into the mix here. Having played bedroom bass for too many years to mention (used to be a drummer) into a little 30w combo I recently took the plunge to get back into playing in public. Auditions went well - rehearsal studios had various amp/cab configurations so I was able to play without my own back line. I didn't have a lot of cash, and was wary of buying from ebay/gumtree etc. for something that might be absolutely perfect, or just buying someone else's problems. I did the usual trawl of local music shops and played a variety of stuff before settling on the BG250 208. Loads of reasons, but primarily I just liked the tone I got from it (and the price), it's diminutive size and weight sealed it for me. I got a customer return for GBP190, which I still think was a pretty good deal.
So first gig depping for a bunch of kids (ok I'm an old git and anyone in their 20's is a kid in my book lol) 2 guitars and drums playing recent rock / pop in small venues (100 bods) and the little combo stood up reasonably well playing with only vocals (and bass drum) through the PA. Didn't have to dial much past 2 o'clock to be heard. Feedback from the audience was that the bottom was a bit absent but mid and highs were fine (Spectracomp set at about 10 o'clock certainly helps on the volume front).
Depping for a Heavy rock covers band made me question my original 'yeah 250w will be plenty' thoughts. This band had a loud drummer, and two guitarists, one blackstar and the other marshall valve. I had to max the little thing all the way to eleven. Only time I heard myself was when I hit a bum note, or when the song meant only one of the guitars (or less) was playing. I promised I would sort out my lack of noise in time for the gig and borrowed an 18" sub and power amp from a DJ friend and DI'd the BG to the power amp. Problem solved but not really the solution I was looking for. I then found a really tatty well gigged (and probably abused) 2x10 behringer cab on gumtree for GBP40. OMG what a difference. All of a sudden all this stuff about Ohms and pushing air made sense. Not only was their an appreciable difference in volume, the bottom end really came to life. The band noticed the difference immediately both in terms of tone and volume. The slight tube growl and the sustain from the compression software really worked for their sound. Playing in a live situation with these guys to 100-300 people venues my mini stack performed really well, and only with the 300 strong crowd did I have to go to 3 o'clock or a little beyond on the volume.
I have now got myself a band, we play traditional heavy rock covers (zep, sabbath, ACDC, lizzy and the like), we are essentially a trio (bass guitar drums) although our vocals occasionally jumps in on rhythm guitar for a couple of numbers, and all are happy with the volume/tone I deliver into the mix. I rarely go above 12 o'clock (around 10 if I use the extension cab) in our rehearsal situation so I'm pretty confident that my current set up will hold up in a live situation without having to call on my borrowing skills with my DJ friend.
One thing to add. It makes a real difference which bass I use to the overall tone / volume I get out of the cab. My passive, an old Hohner Arbor P copy - loud but boomy and under-defined lows (as others have mentioned on the BG250 threads), Vintage Bubinga V940 Active - way quieter, but great tone and a more even delivery between highs and lows (almost rickenbacker like), Traben Neo Active - much louder than the Hohner even when going through the low gain channel, and a really nice well rounded tone (my drummer said 'wow - that sounds mighty'), and my 'comedy' Vintage Metal Axxe Wraith again Active - somewhere between the Traben and Hohner in terms of volume and tonally - well it's an acquired taste, If I spent the time messing with the amp and bass eq I'm sure I could dial in something I'm happy with, but for now its use is the two Stone Sour covers and then more for the visuals rather than tone.
So - long post, to answer a fairly straightforward question. To summarise:
The Spectracomp toneprint makes a big difference to boosting the volume
The 208 on it's own is fine although there is a definite roll off at the bottom end (and don't even try to run an octaver through it on the E string - I presume all you 5 stringers out there would suffer massively in this area but then again I doubt if this little beast would be anywhere near your shopping list far less be on it).
The 208 coupled to a 210 (or I would imagine 410, 115 or even 112 as long as they are 8 Ohm) would probably suffice in the majority of situations.
The caveat of course is that you are not competing with a loud drummer and a couple of ramped up guitars, but you are playing in a band that understands how a live mix works and can rely on a FOH PA when the venue demands it.
From the sound of your situation (jazz - assuming keyboards, drums and some brass/woodwind) I reckon this would be fine.
Oh, one other thing, I believe that the 208 is the only BG combo that allows connection to an external cab, just make sure it's an 8 Ohm one.
Oh.. and another thing - I play with a plec rather than fingers - just prefer the attack and the way it sounds.
 
Last edited:
I'm sad I missed a lot of this discussion about the limitations of the BG250 115. The boominess around 100 hz and lack of real bass below forced me to get a new amp. Anything below the D on the A string was nearly inaudible while anything higher than the E on the A string just boomed to high hell. There are things that could've helped this situation but ultimately, IMO after it being my #1 amp for over a year, this amp is not that great. I would agree that the cab design is likely the fault. It has a lot of good qualities, but not being able to play the low notes on my A string and having some farting issues with my E string drove me to an upgrade.
 
Sounds nothing like my BG250 15. Yes, a bit of boxiness probably around 100hz, but I've never run into issues with the volume of lower notes down to my open E. No problems at all.. to be honest, I usually cut the bass just a touch. I never had it fart out and I'd played it just about wide open at a few gigs... Sorry you had bad luck with yours. I really think you should try a different one some time to see if it was possibly just the unit you had. I've played a couple different models in different stores... I've played the v1 and v2 models. I happen to have a v1 and I think they both sound the same. The fact that you keep mentioning any notes lower than a D being nearly inaudible makes me think something had to be wrong with your particular unit.. which is really too bad.

If you get a chance, try another one out some day and post back.
 
Yes, your sound description of the bg250 sounds a bit non typical.
I measured this 100hz bump on mine, but even if boomy it wasn't unplayable.
As Scottkarch, I tend to cut the bass a bit and get very usable tones.
Did you encounter this bad tones in different rooms ? Because it can also be a room issue that could be fixed with an external eq.

I also noticed that I get tones that I prefer by cutting a bit the bass on my combo, and then roll off a bit my tone tone knob on my basses, like that the tone remains bassy, but without the boom.

This combo is mid heavy which is not as many other rigs which are often scooped a bit. An external eq can also be your friend to tame that a bit, if you want to reduce the mids at another frequency than 500Hz, which is the cut frequency of the bg250 mid knob.
I have very good results with a VT Bass, a Joyo/Harley Benton American or the Zoom B3 for example.
Many options to get a more personal tone !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scottkarch
I do the same with mine. I can roll off the bass on the amp to cut out the boom. I don't roll off the tone but just a touch. I like to keep some of the P's bite. The Big Muff I've got has a natural mid-scoop going on, so I combat that by rolling off the tone a little more and having it's volume boost turned up a bit.

The only thing I've really been considering doing has been adding a DI with an overdrive and/or and EQ. That would give me a tone between clean and crazy fuzz, or would give me (hopefully) a couple of different frequencies I can dial in or out.
 
If you don't know really what you want you should try a zoom B3.
Many effects including drives and amp sims and very useful tools as a parametric eq, à high pass filter, compressors and a DI.
The only problem with this kind of multi fx is the risk to spend all your time searching new tones instead of playing :)
 
I just picked up a BG250-115 MKII combo yesterday from the Nashville GC. I doubt that it will ever get gigged - I own a small studio an hour south of Nashville, and my old Roland Cube 30 just wasn't cutting it. I usually record bass direct, but I plan on recording direct and mic'ing the cabinet as well. I had planned on buying a Rumble, but I just liked the sound of the BG250 more.