danny, you make me want the pedal more.....
Sheep trapped in another sheep sounds like it would be awesome......
i played a passive warwick that sounded like that today. it was pissing me off. couldnt get ANY attack out of it no matter what i did.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
danny, you make me want the pedal more.....
Sheep trapped in another sheep sounds like it would be awesome......
If you don't like the bypass of this pedal, get a true-bypass-looper (or make one) as it will still be in your chain if you put it in the fx loop!
This pedal will run in an fx loop, but as it will be getting a hotter signal the drive control will need turning down a bit more than you normally would. The most commong use of this pedal with an fx loop would be to bypass the amp's pre-amp by going bass -> VT Bass -> FX loop return, which is exactly how I will be using mine when I find myself using someone else's amp that I don't get on with.
Just used the VT bass as a preamp with power amp setup for rehearsal last night. My signal looked like this:
Jazz bass-->VT Bass-->GX3 power amp-->Avatar B410 x2
Usually i run an SVT through the Avatars and it always sounds great. With the VT bass setup however, the experience was fantastic. I was able to get all the tones of the SVT and then some. This is really a great pedal for my purposes, It has made me re think my current SVT setup....
For those that own both if you set each to a "model" such as SVT or Fat Tube do they sound the same? In other words, are the "models" more accurate with the VT?
I'm glad I decided to take another look through this thread. I'm thinking about doing this myself, since I'm not a great fan of my Ashdown ABM. It's good with the VT Bass infront of it, but if the VT Bass running direct into my sound card is anything to go by, it'll sound even better with the preamp completely out of the equation.
Cheers, until now I had no idea I could completely bypass the preamp, not something I'd really considered doing before.
So has anyone actually tried this, how did it sound?
EDIT: Never mind, I should have just carried on reading.
This is exactly what I was looking for! Good to hear, thanks for sharing your experience![]()
Hi Guys,
Sorry to show my ignorance here but could someone tell me the correct way to run my VT pedal through the effects loop on my LM2 ? I am currently running into the front of the amp in this order: Fender 2008 Am Std> Korg Pitchblack> Boss CEB-3 chorus>VT Bass> Boss LMB-3 limiter/enhancer>LM2. Thanks for the help.
I take it you mean the VT Bass and the BDDI?
I've not actually tried comparing the recommended settings, that come with the two, I could give it a go at rehersal on Tuesday if I can find my BDDI manual.
Regardless, to my ears at least, the VT Bass sounds a fair bit closer to what I recognise as the SVT sound.
Only thing I have to add -where do u guys place the vt in your pedal chain
If you want to bypass the preamp in your LMII completely, I'd try going with the same pedal order you already have, but instead of pluging into the LMII input from the Limiter/Enhancer, plug into the LM II effects loop return instead.
However, if you just want to run your VT Bass after your LMII preamp but not bypass it completely, there is no real "correct way" per se, only general consensus and what works best for you.
Most people, tend to put only modulation (chorus, phaser, flanger etc) and time-based effects (reverb, delay) in the effects loop, since they often work just as well if not better, when run after the preamp. Generally, filter effects (wahs, envelop filters etc), pitch shifting and harmoniser effects and overdrive-based effects (distortion, fuzz etc) tend to work better infront of the preamp and don't fair too well for most people in the effects loop. The latter would include the VT Bass, though with the drive at 0 it may not count as it only shapes tone then.
Bascially, there are no concrete rules, with regard to effect placement, before or after the premap. For instance Tom Morello of RATM, runs a wah and Whammy pedal in his effects loop with great success. The only right way, is what ever sounds best to you. Just experiment a bit and see what you like the most![]()
gibsualdo, sorry but I had a follow up question. So if I go from the limiter out to the effects loop return, what goes into the send input ? Sorry for these questions, but I've never used an effects loop and I don't want to damage the amp.
From the VT Bass manual said:You can also plug the pedal into the effects loop return (if the amp has one). This will disable the entire pre-amp of the amplifier allowing you to hear a truer representation of the sound. NOTE: the master volume on your amplifier will be defeated, so be sure to have the volume control down on the pedal.
No problem man, that's what these forums are for
To answer your question, nothing. Leave the effects loop send empty. All the send does, is take the signal from your amp's preamp, so you can run it through the pedals in the effects loop.
Don't worry, so long as you follow the instructions properly, your amp should be perfectly safe.
Only thing I have to add -
I have a EBS MultiComp and EBS Octabass with the VT on the pedalboard. I originally ran:
Bass ->Octabass->MultiComp->VT-> LMII->Cab; but tried:
Bass->MultiComp->Octabass->VT Pedal->LMII-> Cab
thinking the Octaver would work better off the compressed signal. For whatever reasons, got the most horrendous feedback and had to crank the the VT's drive knob down to almost to 2 (the "8 o'clock position").
ok, I had decided to buy a vt bass pedal, because I wanted the svt sound. well, a buddy of mine messed with my amp today because he knew I didnt like the tone and after hew was tweaking the eq for a few minutes, I told him to stop, told him THAT was the sound I wanted. He looked surprised and disgusted and asked, you want THAT sound... it sounds like a f*$%ing ampeg.
so I no longer need the vt for the ampeg sound. I do however want some fuzz, and some overdrive so I don't have to actually turn up the gain knob on my amp in between (or worse yet during) songs. Is the vt still the way to go? or is it more money than I need to spend for what I now want?
Jimmy's opinion here is probably better than mine, but I'd say some overdrive, yes - fuzz, not so much. The Character and Drive knobs will give somewhat of the "raging SVT" sound people rave about. If you're looking for fuzz, you may want to try a Fulltone Bass Drive MOSFET, it has a bunch of different overdrive sounds in it. Also Ibanez makes a pretty decent pedal for OD & fuzz, I think it's called a Phat Bass, not sure though. I tried one about two years ago, but I went with the Fulltone at the time, as I'm more into a clunk sound than a fuzz sound. At any rate, good luck and try as many pedals as you can before you buy. Get what's good for your ears, not mine or anybody else's...