My wishbass fretless has a fairly thin but DEEP neck so i guess its CHUNkY as ****! Nut width is a bit thinner than my matt freeman p. But damn! The thickness is easily 3x thicker than any p ive played! If not more! Possible picks coming soon.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
My SX neck is chunky (for a J), in fact that was one of the selling points for me. I prefer P-bass necks but wanted to add a J for the extra tones it brings to the table. I played a BUNCH of Jazz basses and didn't really get on with the skinny necks.
I would be the guy you find with a P neck on a Jazz, instead of the usual way around!!
Here's my chunky three:
View attachment 326316

Doesn't the Warwick thumb have a sizable neck?
I remember trying an Epiphone Thunderbird. The neck felt really terrific. Of course, that also meant 80% of TB hated it.
I wonder if the Gibson Thunderbird's neck is similar.
Am I laboring under a delusion in thinking that the necks on current-production, MIM, Classic 50s P Bass that measures 1-3/4" wide at the nut are chunky? Are the necks on those wide but thin? What's the deal?
I've been intrigued by the specs of this bass because I like chunky necks, but don't think I'd like this neck if it's thin despite its width. Please school me, as I've never seen one of these in the flesh. Thanks.
It's not just a shame, it's a travesty. Any plans I might have had to look into Gibson Thunderbirds have been derailed.