I’m sorry, I just can’t buy what y’all are selling here. Like sure, the specific example that you gave of a sheet of paper 5lb amp being too big may be a little silly… but that’s not what the other comment said.
He said that it ‘makes him sad’ that many bassists feel that ‘smaller is better.’ I a) don’t understand why that would remotely be something that makes him ‘sad’ or even bothers him in the least and b) find it wholly indefensible on its face, as smaller is pretty objectively better if we’re not playing a tube amp.
Secondly, I’m just not sure who you’re seeing that says that your example, 10”x12” @4.5# is too big. Now if these people actually exist, then sure maybe that’s a little silly..
BUT at the same time, if we are heading to where amps can be smaller than that with ACTUAL power and not just these silly 200w deals… then I’m sorry again, but smaller just IS better, then. Until we reach the point where we are losing ubiquitous features of an amp, I just can’t take the complaint seriously… and considering the number of pedals that manage 10 knobs and a side chain, there’s room before we hit ‘too small’ (assuming the tech actually develops further to shrink amps in that way.)
I love tube amps, I don’t begrudge anybody theirs and I love the sound.. but I don’t at all understand what I interpreted as the previous commenter’s romanticization of size, and the loss thereof being a shame..
Personally, I don’t have any interest in a beeper-sized amp that you control through an App on your phone.. but there are people for whom the gear size arms race is opening new opportunities in their career. The absolute misery of playing in a big city, schlepping gear on subways or in cabs, is not something I miss in the least, and if bassists are able to downsize to a gig bag and a lightweight cab, then you’re just not going to convince me that’s a bad thing.. which is what he said made him sad