TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yes indeed, Rod. I don't own one, but I was able to audition the 300 at Bass Club Chicago for about 15 minutes a while back. The second channel can be clean as a whistle, just turn the blend knob to zero.Cool, thanx.
Another tho...
Can Ch.2 be set CLEAN also?
eg. Set Ch.1 clean, & Ch.2 clean & with a totally different eq to Ch.1 ?
Sorry for all the questions. I'm thinking seriously about this amp & another too, as I've gotten rid of a few things lately- a "sea-change" if you will.![]()
I think Bass Gear Mag may have covered both these topics in its review, but I can't recall. Definitely worth a read if you haven't looked at it already.My '64 blackface has no mid control, but it has a presence control.
Does the mid on the new Super Bassman's vintage channel fulfill the same EQ function?
Has anyone compared the sound of a vintage blackface to the Super Bassman?
Correction: I don't know what happened when I first used the stock cable, but it is working fine. Even went so far as to test it with an ohm meter.So glad I read this entire thread.
I ran into the same issue where there was no sound coming out of it when I first fired it up. I immediately replaced the stock speaker cable with one of my own and Voila! glorious tubey tones appeared.
I think Bass Gear Mag may have covered both these topics in its review, but I can't recall. Definitely worth a read if you haven't looked at it already.
Thanks, guys. I re-read the BG article today, and my recollection was correct; it didn't address my questions.
My '64 blackface has no mid control, but it has a presence control.
Does the mid on the new Super Bassman's vintage channel fulfill the same EQ function?
Has anyone compared the sound of a vintage blackface to the Super Bassman?