TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Heh, my alter-ego. But since they both wear glasses, which is which?! It wasn't that much of a secret, given that I did have to state my new position/affiliation in my profile.
We're looking at setting up a commercial account, so at least during the weekdays (because honestly, you're never really "off the clock" in a social media position), I'm going to be handling everything from this from now on.
If Progressives don't get put on that bass I'm going to burn it.


Maybe GHS and BMT can team up since they're that close......who knows?![]()
I've already said that will probably be the string that comes on it. It would be sooooo much easier if the 5 string packs would comfortably fit a 35" scale. So I guess I'll have to order a special set from BSO and be angry about it.
Maybe GHS and BMT can team up since they're that close......who knows?![]()
I'm not the one that makes those decisions, but I can certainly pass that along.
Go with the .136 B. You and your intestines can thank me later.
I'd be more concerned with not having to create my own 5 string set out of singles thusly making it much more affordable and financially able to place the strings on a multitude of basses.
That has already been mentioned. A couple of times, actually. And I agree with you completely.
Oh I know. Just adding to the group opinion so it's apparent that it's not just a select group of users.![]()
I'd be more concerned with not having to create my own 5 string set out of singles thusly making it much more affordable and financially able to place the strings on a multitude of basses.
Well, I do have that second 310 on the way to me...........hmm
That has already been mentioned. A couple of times, actually. And I agree with you completely.
You're appreciated.![]()
i'd like to see GHS make a set of round-core boomers. i miss the flexibility of the hibeams but love the tone and smooth feel of boomers.
What about going with a lighter gauge? I ask because I was using a set of .40-.95's and they were pretty flexible!![]()
i'd like to see GHS make a set of round-core boomers. i miss the flexibility of the hibeams but love the tone and smooth feel of boomers.
Interesting - I just put on a set of Boomers, 40 - 120 and they feel just a tad large / stiff. Big sound, feel good... Perhaps a tad low-mid heavy.
Interesting - I just put on a set of Boomers, 40 - 120 and they feel just a tad large / stiff. Big sound, feel good... Perhaps a tad low-mid heavy.
The Boomers definitely have a nice smooth feel and play 'fast'.
the lighter guage was something of a revelation to me as well. i'd been using 45-105 since the beginning and swore off the idea of using light-guage strings because they would be "floppy". i was dead wrong. the light guage set of boomers (40-55-75-95) feel really good to me. the "standard" 65-guage d-string usually bothered me due to how stiff it felt in comparison to the other strings, but now it's quite comfortable. i'm pretty happy so far with the set, but i would like the G-string a bit lighter, perhaps a 35. and if they made a round-core set, they would be the prefect balance of size and felxibility to me.