Thanks. Yeah, I really love this bass.Wow! Very nice. Is that a 535?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thanks. Yeah, I really love this bass.Wow! Very nice. Is that a 535?
I think your link is bad.
Very different. I have a Super 5 and a 635. The Super is much more aggressive and growly, and the 635 cannot mimic it IMO. The 635 has a fuller sound. What style(s) of music are you playing?I'm curious about the USA Super 5/6, how does it compare with the 535/635?
Thanks for the reply! I mostly play prog with a lot of tapping and slapping. Right now I'm playing a Roscoe SKB-3006, which has the pickup placement roughly halfway between the Super and the 635...Very different. I have a Super 5 and a 635. The Super is much more aggressive and growly, and the 635 cannot mimic it IMO. The 635 has a fuller sound. What style(s) of music are you playing?
You can definitely have both qualities in an MTD. I’ve owned a number of 535s and have only ever had a problem with getting lost in the mix with one. Lots of gigs with bands ranging from trios to thirteen pieces and no problems with the other 535s.The guy said it was a feeler, so maybe he change his mind. Or it sold, used 6s are not that common especially in europe.
Anyway, I was a bit disappointed by the sound compared to the other basses in the clip, that's why I asked about opinions here
I thought it just sounded very soft and polite, when others were more direct.
Basically I ask because I had an MTD in the past, and while played on its own it was the most beautiful bass sound I ever had, in the mix it had difficulties to cut through.
And ok I ask because I still miss it, and somehow except that both might just be possible, sound nice on its own and nice in a (very) busy mix.
Well, the good/bad news is, you just had the wrong wood combo for your rig and/or playing style. I'd definitely have a conversation with Mike/Daniel, and try again (since you say you miss it).Basically I ask because I had an MTD in the past, and while played on its own it was the most beautiful bass sound I ever had, in the mix it had difficulties to cut through. And ok I ask because I still miss it, and somehow except that both might just be possible, sound nice on its own and nice in a (very) busy mix.
What years are we talking about? My oldest 535 (from the late ‘90s I believe) has a pretty thin headstock. But MTDs are not the most consistent basses; there can be quite a bit of variation between one and the next in terms of carves, thicknesses, neck profiles, etc.Has the headstock design changed over time? I just got a 534 and the headstock seems a lot thinner than I remember them being on the 535's I had a few years ago.
And....? Come on, Scuba. You know the rule.I just got a 534
And....? Come on, Scuba. You know the rule.![]()
Yeah, I know. Well, here you go. Some will recognize this one. It is a featherweight at 7.5 lbs.
It's very hard to take the growl out of my Super without going to sort of a dull tone. I think the Super is best for jazz, funk, Latin, or stonerish rock like 311 or Incubus. For prog you may like the clarity and versatility of the normal location. You could also ask Mike about the Super pickups in the normal location. Maybe someone else here has a different opinion of the Super...but I don't think there are many people here that have one.Thanks for the reply! I mostly play prog with a lot of tapping and slapping. Right now I'm playing a Roscoe SKB-3006, which has the pickup placement roughly halfway between the Super and the 635...
That's insanely light for a 5 string. Beautiful bass!Yeah, I know. Well, here you go. Some will recognize this one. It is a featherweight at 7.5 lbs.
The mid control is push/pull. I much prefer this set up having the tone control.