• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The official "Show your basses" thread part 19!

Hey, the Precision was a successful experiment. We always look for improvement...

Not sure we can say it was simply an 'experiment.' The whole manufacturing method and use of materials etc. were drawn out with the intention of mass production and repeatability (i.e. selling).
 
Not sure we can say it was simply an 'experiment.' The whole manufacturing method and use of materials etc. were drawn out with the intention of mass production and repeatability (i.e. selling).
Everything is an experiment, in that we always, eventually, seem to improve. Fender was a venture that worked, but the idea was taken and moved up a notch, hence we ended up with Fender Japan... And yes, Music Man, G&L...
 
Everything is an experiment, in that we always, eventually, seem to improve. Fender was a venture that worked, but the idea was taken and moved up a notch, hence we ended up with Fender Japan... And yes, Music Man, G&L...

Also, as the company that has made the electric bass the longest and the most produced per year ever since 1951 - odds are they won't all be 'great'. It's build into any 'mass-produced' product.
 
I can see how they could get that impression, but I also agree that was not the intent.

The Fender, MM, & G&L basses are fine in their own right and clearly have their fans.

Also, it would be factually fair to say that if one supposes they each have similar tolerance levels baked into their QC for mass production, the one that produces the most basses and has produced the most basses historically would end up with the most duds.

That isn't a knock, it is just facts.
 
I can see how they could get that impression, but I also agree that was not the intent.

The Fender, MM, & G&L basses are fine in their own right and clearly have their fans.

Also, it would be factually fair to say that if one supposes they each have similar tolerance levels baked into their QC for mass production, the one that produces the most basses and has produced the most basses historically would end up with the most duds.

That isn't a knock, it is just facts.
SCIENCE!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rod Barchetta
Warmoth Body, Freestone neck, True Custom 54P pickup, Fender bridge, Fender tuners and Ken Smith Burner strings. I am amazed at the tones I can conjure from such a simple set-up.
2e4f6d84f8b6f0e04c01a49a276e0e8cdb2c50f6.jpeg


Warmoth Body, Warmoth neck, SD QP Pickups, Hipshot bridge and Tuners (I think) strung with DR Hi-Beams (may change to Chrome Flats but the Hi-Beams sound so good)
4a3ddef4fd2a4ca96f3782bc9ccba87370beec0b.jpeg


Sterling Ray34 (stock)-Sounds so good with TI Jazz Rounds

2fa86302978538db125aff17e70fc3ea9169a80b.jpeg


Vintage VJ-74 Re-issue...TI Jazz Flats. Plays and sounds great. Wilkinson components throughout.
f32c20feb7356411a6a02a5f1a35fa0f62faf5f2.jpeg


Ibanez SR300-not my favorite. Neck is too thin and makes my hands feel crowded. Will probably give it away to someone looking for a good, serviceable bass to get started.
6ce4fe203d772b7e8f8818e378381a9eb78fc023.jpeg


The one that got me hooked. LTD B50 FM. Got it basically for free. Plays well, neck is okay, but it is another one I may give away to someone that wants to play bass but does not have the funds to get started. I also have amps that will go with the give-away basses..an Ampeg BA108 and a GK Backline 115. All serviceable with no problems.

3a835853efd9f5e89ff2ca3867c30ffa80fca8b1.jpeg