• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Reverend club

Status
Not open for further replies.
I checked the measurements he pictured against my case. They are a little off, but I suppose that could be normal. Ask if he can show a pic with a Fender style bass laying in it.

I don't have my BH5 with me (in the shop for minor work -- fret sprout and new straplocks; possibly some electronic work), but the cases for my BH5 and my 5L are definitely different, but both Reverend B/W cases. The inside of my 5L case is red, and it is slightly larger/longer than the case for my BH5, which has a black interior. The basses are about the same size, but the cases are definitely different.
 
How would you compare the P/J Fish to the Lakland Skyline Duck Dunn or Glaub? And the J/J to the Skyline Darryl Jones? It looks like I might be waiting a while for a Fish and I need a new bass soon so one of these should hold me over. I haven't been able to get my hands on a Lakland, but I am guessing many of you have.

I had a Lakland DJ5, and have played a Skyline Glaub. I love Laklands, but they are really nothing like Reverends. The DJ5 was a classic '70s style Jazz bass -- very aggressive and punchy, lots of treble. Reverends tend to be much more thumpy and have less treble, mainly because the bridge pickup is located further from the bridge. I'd say a better comparison (in terms of tone) would be to the Glaub -- sometimes my 5L sounds a little bit like a 5-string P bass. But in the end, they really have their own tone -- TONS of booty, with a very fat, warm midrange, not much sparkle or sizzle. I have my 5L strung with TI flats, and its nickname is the Reverend Thumpy. :D

As far as feel, the Reverends are lighter, less neck dive than my DJ5, and the neck profile is a little thicker (front to back) than the DJ5, with narrower string spacing. The Reverend neck also feels like it's been played for 20 years already.
 
Hey Trev, thanks for the "operating room" pics.
When I was getting my custom Curbow built (since sold), I had Greg (R.I.P.) take precise measurements of the neck on my blue Rumblefish, and he asked if he could have a look under the hood. He checked it out, and opined that the Reverend "probably cost $100 to build." I always wondered about that. I'm sure it had to be more than $100. Right? Not that it matters, it'd just be interesting to know.
 
I supppose once you had mass production techniques down, mmmmm, maybe.
But setting everything up to consistently machine the sustain bar into the tone block, have the tone block fit the body, fit the front and sides together, join the neck to it and have it fit decent and tight, and in line front to rear, side to side...
Seems pretty labor intensive to me.
It'd be neat to stop by the shop sometime and see whow it all goes together, follow one down the line...I'm sure the guitar line can't very much in terms of "process..."
 
Hey Trev, thanks for the "operating room" pics.
When I was getting my custom Curbow built (since sold), I had Greg (R.I.P.) take precise measurements of the neck on my blue Rumblefish, and he asked if he could have a look under the hood. He checked it out, and opined that the Reverend "probably cost $100 to build." I always wondered about that. I'm sure it had to be more than $100. Right? Not that it matters, it'd just be interesting to know.

I'm assuming that labor is NOT factored into that. For materials alone, that's probably right. Of course, my Sadowsky probably didn't cost that much more in materials, either.

Any bass is cheap if you look at just the cost of materials. If he's including labor, then he's lost his mind, or was thinking they were put together by Chinese children, a la SX basses. :eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.