~....would much rather this thing cost another 100 dollars and have some nearly guaranteed quality....
Yep.
~
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
~....would much rather this thing cost another 100 dollars and have some nearly guaranteed quality....
~Red knobs that go to 11 hath arriven.
View attachment 3921429
View attachment 3921431
View attachment 3921432
I'll post a better picture tomorrow when the sun's out.

BTW, what years did they build the MIM P-Bass JR basses ?
~Unfortunately, I don't think there has been a whole lot of string innovation for this type of bass.
There Could be, but I don't think we have seen it.
When I first fell down this rabbit hole, for anyone who remembers my Picco Bass times, I made up the tension difference by essentially stringing with 5 string gauges. The bass was a 25" scale design, using essentially BEAD gauges tuned+ to EADG. That made up the difference.
In this 28" scale world, I don't think anyone has bothered, even though it would be pretty easy to match a string design to the scale that would yield proper tension and tone.

~
As I frequently lament, bass players are the Rodney Dangerfield of musicians - We get No Respect.
That was a good idea, using part of a 5 string set at raised pitch, but what did you do about the scale length at the tuners ?
~
~Once again, on strings for the Squier Mini P...
First off, the butt to nut length on the Mini P is 76 cm/30". The center of the E tuner is 4 cm/1.5" past the nut. The "perfect fitting" string would have a 31.5" to 32" ball to taper length. - Almost all short scale strings are 34" ball to taper....

~I like the pickguard as a thumbrest, myself... it's thick enough that the edge of my thumb nestles in there perfectly, and I have a wide variety of options.
~I emailed Fender after I received my mini and they told me they had no plans to make a set just for the mini. They do get back to you same day.

~....The full winding length of *some* strings advertised as "short-scale" is almost at or even over 34" (Thomastik-Infeld "short-scale" strings are 35.5", DR are 33.75", Pyramid and Höfner are notoriously Beatlebass-friendly at 33.5"), but the majority of them are 32"~32.75". - True, that means they're too long for the Mini-P anyway.
~For whatever it is worth - not much:
Since Fender these days is very responsive, I wrote and asked - are there any plans to bring back the P Jr, and, are there any plans to add other colors to the Squier Mini P lineup. Response was nope and nope.
Oh, I wouldn't have expected that, good to know (and glad to know your specific combination worked). It also has to do with the length of the trapeze tailpiece: some are shorter than others (vd. for ex. the one they use on the Epiphone Viola) and would possibly accommodate La Bella mediums, but maybe not their shorts; the Pyramid/Höfner/La Bella* Beatle-bass winding length is probably tailored toward fitting as many violin bass models as possible.However regular LaBella short scale strings fit mine, albeit with not much winding to spare after the nut [Ignition Club series].
For that, I chose their low tension flats.
I'm really enjoying this bass.
Anybody contemplating taking the plunge on getting a replacement pickguard cut?![]()
Here you go. Doesn't have Fender's logo, but, it's same scale as the Mini P apparently:
sure, there's the mini P bass - where's the mini J?
Nonetheless, you can still hear the bass calling: Pick me up... Stroke my neck... Smack me on the bottom... Make me moan... You know you want to...
~
LaBella even cautions of breakage, if you put their regular strings onto a bass which needs string-through.
If this concern is true for THEIR strings, then I would reasonably expect most other brands also to fracture at the bend where it comes from the body hole to the bridge.
That said, some bridge designs might exacerbate that problem more, and others less so ?
I've never had a bass which did string-thru, so the only weirdness which I have encountered in choosing string scale lengths is the Hofner 'trapeze style' bridge, which pulls maybe 2 inches extra of each string onto the ball side of the saddle, so that the wound part of plenty of short scale strings cannot reach the nut of most Hofners, even though their basses ARE short scale.
~
~
They don't fit my huge hands, and my 1974 Ric, bought new that year, has a [typical for them] 1 11/16" [43mm] nut width.
I'm an old dog, I reckon.
I can learn new songs, but not so good on new tricks.
From time to time, I have tried narrow nut basses, but they feel weird and uncomfortable, especially after all this time with the Ric, and regular scale Precisions prior to that.
Most recently I played a Schecter Stiletto 4 [1.5" nut and 34" scale as most Schecters are] for a whole 4 hour gig, to test it after restringing and setting it up for its owner.
I got thru it.
The bass was nice and light weight, sounded decent, with no hum, but....
Last year, I scooped a Hofner Ignition series Club bass.
Short [30"] scale, but the nut width is same as the Ric, therefive MUCH easier transition for the left hand, and feather-light at around 5 pounds.
The kicker is that I do not NEED any more basses (few of us here really do, even if we can afford the cost), so if it's going to give me GAS, it either has to be a bass which I will actually try to play, including being light weight [which Rics are not], when gigs resume after Covid, or it has to be AWFULLY pretty on the eyes.
If I want pretty [for the wall], I might buy a Jazz with a Maple fingerboard and natural body, or one of those Schecters in natural finish.
But a lightweight 30" scale bass with a wide nut and Maple fingerboard, and no hum, it could look ugly as sin and I could justify buying it to play at gigs.
That's why.
Oh, and BTW, a 1/10" change represents a larger percentage of difference on a smaller scale instrument.
~
Exactly. You know you want to. I'm reasonably sure that you'll love it. (Hubby, too!) It sounds like a P should, and is amazingly responsive... plus it's so cute! So tiny! So affordable! So fun!... this thread keeps me thinking
buy one, sounds like a p bass sized like a mikro... no, no - i don't need another bass! come on, it's so cute and lightweight... aw, man! you know you want to... ...
~....my husband is 6' 7" and he plays a jazz bass...
Exactly. You know you want to. I'm reasonably sure that you'll love it. (Hubby, too!) It sounds like a P should, and is amazingly responsive... plus it's so cute! So tiny! So affordable! So fun!I believe Squier hit it out of the park with this one.
~
Has he played a JB for a long time, and not much else, so he's familiar with it ?
That's how I am with the wider nut architecture, due to my Ric 4001 since 1974, and two P basses before it.
Even now, my only reason to change is how much the Ric weighs, and maybe liking a shorter scale, the Hofner being my first serious taste of that, as well as weighing only about 5 pounds.
~
Ibanez brand Mikro strings fit perfectly, except for the G, which is too short. I used a "regular" .045 nickel roundwound cut to fit. Anyway, note where the taper sits.So I guess there are no available strings that will fit these basses and Fender have no intention of making any. Well, that pretty much put me off them.
Of course there's always the possibility of modding the bass with a tailpiece (something similar to a Warwick bridge) but that's a lot of hassle and money to compensate for Fender's lack of support for their own instruments...
the ibanez 30" talman has a very slightly wider nut, but i'm guessing not enough to help you.
So I guess there are no available strings that will fit these basses and Fender have no intention of making any. Well, that pretty much put me off them.
Of course there's always the possibility of modding the bass with a tailpiece (something similar to a Warwick bridge) but that's a lot of hassle and money to compensate for Fender's lack of support for their own instruments...