I was lazily waiting for someone else to answer this, but I guess I'll take itThis actually raises a question around the uncertainty I was having recently! Between the Slampegg and London Underground demos, it sounds like the LU pushes harder into breakup and straight-up drive territory. As bassists, we love breakup even more than moody pop singers do, which may explain the migration away from the PA (if the LU is like a PA but ruder)...that or just about every bass player here's got a PA now heh
To switch up comparisons, might one say that the gain on tap between the PA and the Slampegg are similar? As in, is the Slampegg more of a "relationship on the rocks" than full-on breakup kind of thing?
So really the only big difference between PA and LU is the tone stack placement. In PA it's between the two gain stages, in LU it's at the very end after both gain stages. The stages are actually set up for the same gain, and they both have about the same output level, then there are small differences in component values that result in the "voicing." But I have had a handful (I think 6 or so) requests for a LU with a PA tonestack, and it gives an excellent best of both worlds setup in my opinion.
Now Slampegg is a completely different beast. PA and LU both have high output levels and are capable of some beautiful drive tones, but Slampegg breaks up earlier and breaks up dirtier. So I would say that Slampegg has more dirt, but less overall output volume.
