I bought the KT88V-STRs specially for the Thunderchief because it tends to eat tubes. These tubes have a 50W plate dissipation rating, so I was hoping they would work better in the amp than the JJ KT88s I pulled out. My opinion is the JJs were better, however I think one tube out of the quad of Rubys is gassy and may be loosing vacuum, so my assessment could be off.
Here's what happened to form my opinion. The bias drifted like crazy for a couple of weeks and I had to re sort the order of the tubes a couple of time to get a decent current match. After that they settled down and I was able to get them to match right at about 15%, which is not great. Three of tubes were very close and the fourth tube caused problems regardless of which position it is in. According to the test results it is supposed to be the coldest tube, but its the hottest.
If I don't play the amp for a couple of months, it runs hot for a couple of hours then the current starts going back down. I have been playing the amp recently and the current was up around 2.30A total at idle, but has settled back to around 2.16A when the amp is at operating temp. I set the amp up to pull 2.10 at idle, so I suspect the current is going up and the matching is probably getting worse. I wasn't having this sort of problem with the JJs.
Tonewise I think the JJs are more lively and harmonically rich. By messing around with the level of bias I was able to get the Rubys to open up a little bit, but I prefer the JJs. Tone is subjective, so a different person might prefer the sound of the Rubys. Overall I would still say the Thunderchief sounds fabulous, so I would be quite content if I did not pay a premium for the Rubys and get drifty tubes. I probably should have returned them.