In... this beauty used to be Adam's. Thankfully, it wasn't perfect for him, because it is for me! Hope the MM fits the bill for ya though.
![]()
Wow-that's beautiful!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
In... this beauty used to be Adam's. Thankfully, it wasn't perfect for him, because it is for me! Hope the MM fits the bill for ya though.
![]()
In... this beauty used to be Adam's. Thankfully, it wasn't perfect for him, because it is for me! Hope the MM fits the bill for ya though.
![]()
If that's the one we traded for, you've mis-spelled my name
-alan
Thanks, fellers.
And I should have clarified... this was originally Adam's (who has one of those other Valenti's in progress), Nino built it for him. It came to me via trade through Alan. Too many "A's" involved in this deal for my taste.![]()
True-true
That bass was killin' sick, just not my flavor, which really hurt.
Aesthetically, I really liked it.
The trade is still working for me though I used #46 two nights last week.
Just not my tone.
Build quality, , aesthetics, feel, everything else was awesome.
Maybe it was the alder/maple thing; not sure.
Just not my flavor.

Different strokes!
The great thing about builders like Valenti, Nord, Sadowsky, Alleva: you can order what you want.
Perfect!
I'd recommend going with a Big Split instead of a Big Single.
I've never like mixing humbucking pups with single coil pups...
I do.
To my ear, they lose a tiny bit of treble response, and have a tiny bit more mids.
I don't think this is anything you'd notice in other than a solo'd situation, especially in an active bass...
I wouldn't really call the Sadowsky 'vintage voiced,' and if that's your goal, you might like the Nord preamp better...IMO, etc.
With either, if you want vintage flavor, be sure and spec passive tone control.
I think so yes.
I personally find the highs on the AG stuff "are pretty high, and pretty modern."
However, I've not had one with passive tone control, which can be used mitigate that some.
The thing about the Sadowsky preamp is that it's boost-only. So, if you are the sort of person who uses the onboard EQ a lot (I'm not), that preamp ends up giving you a very active-sounding "boosted tone" in one way or another. Which isn't to say that it's bad - it's just a pretty live sounding preamp, and IMO an integral part of the Sadowsky tone.I wouldn't really call the Sadowsky 'vintage voiced,' and if that's your goal, you might like the Nord preamp better...IMO, etc.
With either, if you want vintage flavor, be sure and spec passive tone control.
The thing about the Sadowsky preamp is that it's boost-only. So, if you are the sort of person who uses the onboard EQ a lot (I'm not), that preamp ends up giving you a very active-sounding "boosted tone" in one way or another. Which isn't to say that it's bad - it's just a pretty live sounding preamp, and IMO an integral part of the Sadowsky tone.
Check out [Invalid or Expired Link Removed] I made a while back. In one channel is my Valenti #51, back when it had Sadwosky HC pickups. It has the Sadwosky preamp. In the other channel is one of my passive Skjold basses. Even though I have the tone controls on the Sadowsky preamp flat, and the VTC rolled back about half way, that sounds like a very active J bass.
I have an Aguilar OBP-3 paired with some Bartolini pickups in my Yamaha TRB. Although the output level is notably less hot than any of my other basses (probably the Barts), the preamp can do some interesting dialed-down stuff.