• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

This is interesting... Sire MM Bass???

Also, for me, the "sizzle" on 3 band rays comes from high frequency peak that you can't dial out. I'd be ok with getting rid of that.
Make sense if you could use the passive tone to roll off a bit more of that sizzle. Free up the mids for shaping the top of the bass response.

Between that and the jazz neck pickup, you'd have quite the versatile little bass. Just the ticket for gigs where you like to keep your gear close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: primussucks9126
I really kinda sorta wanted to dislike this bass (due to being a blatant ripoff) but it does tick a lot of boxes for my personal bass preferences:
-22 frets
-HS pickups
-Contoured neck joint
-minimal lower horn (looks might grow on me eventually)
-active controls (though I do wish there was a passive option)

Weight, sound, string spacing (5-string), build quality, and neck profile are yet to be determined and might influence any final purchase decisions. Gotta say it's tempting. I already have a SR5 and an ATK805 so it might be a bit redundant but you never know...

This stood out while I was looking at the z7 specs...
"Composed of Alnico and US-made coil pick up impressing a vintage bass sound ..."
Wonder who makes it?
 
I generally don't care about ripping off designs that have been around forever. I understand that companies need to make money. That said I pay zero attention to budget brands ripping off designs because there are plenty of options from the parent company in the same price range with comparable quality. The days of "Hey get this because its like a Fender but beats the pants off of Squier" are gone. Fender has tons of great products in all the price ranges so why bother. If it works for some people, thats great. Choices are a great thing. I love that the current market is filled with so many quality products in all kinds of price ranges. With Stingrays there is a slight gap in the market because Sterling is a bit spotty from what I hear. So its good these exist. I REALLY wish they would have just stuck with the 4 in a line tuners. It looks better and doesn't send off the same Chinese rip off vibe. But I may still grab one in natural.
 
fernandes-20atla-204x-20maple_zpskchjonji-jpg.2477210
The more I look at this bass, the more I like the good ol’ Fernandes Atlas
 
Vet all you want. That poster is Sterling Ball — he goes by the name “Big Poppa” on the EBMM forum.

I don’t know the status of the trademark today, but EBMM absolutely owned it in the past.

It’s notoriously hard to search Trademarks I’m a way that 100% rules out all possible marks, but it appears that the TM Ernie Ball registered is the headstock SHAPE in addition to the tuner layout. Link Removed
 
I would like to know how this would play out in court. EBMM has the resources and incentives to protect its trademark and chase off small builders proactively, but if Fender or Gibson wanted to make an issue of it, I think a competent patent attorney could make the case that the 3+1 layout is not merely aesthetic, but functional as well. I don't think Sire has those resources, nor are they so invested in the layout to the point they'd take on EBMM even if they did.

They’ve also had plenty of time to file a preliminary injunction and haven’t. So they like don’t have a case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FRoss6788
I'm surprised someone hasn't done something like this sooner. US EBMM prices are chasing boutique prices and the offshore Sterlings now sell for what the US product used to. I expect thousand dollar SUBs any day now.

I understand the price increases (after 10-dollar coffee, 12-dollar bacon, and 60-thousand Ford F150's, why not?), but their sales have got to be shrinking in the face of all this.

WTH. Any day now, I expect to buy 34" scale strings, open the pack, and they're 32": "Same great tone for the Same great price!"

OK, 'ShrinkFlation Blues' in G, 1,2,3 . . . .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Matt-J2 and degv15
LMAOOOOO I hope it's similar to EBMMSRS which I Love

NOOOOOO!!! :bawl:
There are three levels of 5 string Stingray, the expensive once, the affordable Ray 35 and the very budget Sterling, and they're all narrow! We've been pleading for a wide spacing 'Ray for years! Shoot, Ernie Ball made a neck through model and a short scale model, and they still ignore us! :banghead:
I had a five string 'Ray decades ago, never could get along with it. The Laklands 55-02s are well designed, very playable (I have a JoBo Skyline) but just don't sound the same. I guess I'll have to see if I can make one myself. Dremel, here I come. Have mercy on my Attitude 5. :meh:
 
NOOOOOO!!! :bawl:
There are three levels of 5 string Stingray, the expensive once, the affordable Ray 35 and the very budget Sterling, and they're all narrow! We've been pleading for a wide spacing 'Ray for years! Shoot, Ernie Ball made a neck through model and a short scale model, and they still ignore us! :banghead:
I had a five string 'Ray decades ago, never could get along with it. The Laklands 55-02s are well designed, very playable (I have a JoBo Skyline) but just don't sound the same. I guess I'll have to see if I can make one myself. Dremel, here I come. Have mercy on my Attitude 5. :meh:
Wide spacing is the KISS OF DEATH for me. Thus I only like P Basses with Jazz 1.5 necks. Also even though the V5's 5 string spacing is wider than Stingray Specials its not as wide as Fender which I tried and hated it. Laklands 35" scale would also fall into the category for me.
 
Last edited: