Now THAT makes sense! He would be perfect for Queen!If Queen called him, he'd probably take that gig too!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Now THAT makes sense! He would be perfect for Queen!If Queen called him, he'd probably take that gig too!
Now THAT makes sense! He would be perfect for Queen!
Gee, isn't John Deacon good enough for Queen? Best show I ever saw.
Eric
Apparently, his devoted followers can immediately identify his playing whether it is on a fretless or a washtub bass.
Gee, isn't John Deacon good enough for Queen? Best show I ever saw.
Eric
Yes, love Deaky, but he quit...quite a while ago...Gee, isn't John Deacon good enough for Queen? Best show I ever saw.
Eric
I don't follow the guy closely and I'm not sure if I mentioned in in my original post, but the only non-fretless material of his that I'm familiar with was with John Mayer and NIN. My opinion of that material that I have heard was that it was fairly pedestrian sounding. Very good, but pedestrian and not nearly as identifiable as being "Pino" as his fretless work was. Apparently, his devoted followers can immediately identify his playing whether it is on a fretless or a washtub bass.
Why would I be offended by a well composed, rational, dissenting response if I'm not offended by the ignorant ones?You have already been offended by posts from others, and I'm afraid you are going to be offended by what I'm about to say. But it needs to be said:
If you feel that Pino Palladino's playing with the artists you listed is "pedestrian" you are listening for the wrong things.
Please listen to Pino's meter, his tone, and for the notes he does NOT play. Listen to the way his lines support the song, the groove, the vocals, but stop short of trying to call unwarranted attention to themselves. Then listen to his tasteful, inventive, and well placed fills.
If Pino Palladino's bass playing (with the artists you listed) only ranks as "pedestrian" then the rest of us should hang it up right now.
Pino is an outstanding player, but replacing Entwistle with him was like replacing Keith Moon with Kenny Jones.
Huh? You mean Moon?I couldn't disagree with this analogy more. I would say it is like replacing Entwistle with Simon Phillips, which is eventually what happened. Simon Phillips was and is a brilliant player, consummate studio ace, and one of the great players on his instrument of his generation ... much like Pino is to the bass. Kenny Jones is an adequate rock drummer, but little else.
Well, this is the internet...Why would I be offended by a well composed, rational, dissenting response if I'm not offended by the ignorant ones?
It was my pleasure. Not every discussion that involves differing opinions needs to disintegrate into rudeness and name calling.Well, this is the internet...
Thanks for hearing me out. You, sir, are a true gentleman.
My wife drags me to a ton of concerts and the sound, especially when it comes to the bass, so hit or miss. I saw both Sabbath and The Who at The Garden this week and the difference in sound quality between the two bands could not have been more dramatic. I really wasn't expecting much from Sabbath, I just assumed the tour was one last cash grab, but I'd put it in one of the top 3 best sounding shows I've ever heard. The Who sounded pretty much like how I expected Sabbath to sound. It's all up to the sound guy.I had the same observation at the Detroit show. I can't comment on Pino's performance because it was just lost in the mix where I was sitting. Excellent show, otherwise.