• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thoughts on this venue's conditions for a gig?

...well, they didn't provide enough information to make an accounting-based decision. %s here & unknown sponsors there. WTpoop. There several other issues left totally in the dark. Half-baked management. Was it even a written contract?
 
I have played ALL KINDS of "live after five" and summer concert series events. This whole setup is BS. They obviously handed over booking for these shows to a novice who has a friend in the bar business. This person went to the bar, had a few dozen beers, and "learned" how to book shows.View attachment 3431935

This "deal" is cockamamie. It was formulated by an idiot. Do not do any business with THIS PERSON, ever.
 
A community near me has concerts at a gazebo in a local park. I inquired to the organizer about playing there and his response is below (lightly edited to remove irrelevant info and protect the innocent). I'm curious about reactions to this.

...you provide sound system, we provide lights, you provide sound for opening act, first $400 goes to [name of venue], you get 75% of the balance, and……….95% of our patrons are here for the performer - if it’s [name of performer] nite, 95% of the patrons are here to see [name of performer]. So, do you have a following? If you get 150 at $15 per person, that’s $2250 minus $400 x 75%.
If that looks good to you, I’m interested…..AND one last thing - almost all the local acts get me sponsors…….the sponsors keep the admission at a low $15 and kids free. If any guys in your band can find a sponsor, that helps. I hope this does not sound too harsh, but the music business has changed, and the business side has to work, or……..the venue is no longer in business.​

I should add that the venue in question is a Township-owned park, not a private enterprise, and the local Township is a sponsor and there are multiple other corporate sponsors already in place.

After discussing with my band mates, we decided to pass. It didn't feel right to us.

Thoughts?

You did the right thing.

If your band has the kind of pull to make that deal work well for you, you would do better than that elsewhere. If your band is not sure to have enough pull... then you'll be essentially working for free. Now, I do play some free gigs sometimes, whether it is a charity gig or some other kind of event... but never when it is obvious I am just working to help someone else line up their pockets and I am treated like a chump.

I might feel tempted to reply with a counter-offer: I would work for a flat fee.
That's what we always offer when asked to play. Sometimes they try to appeal to your greed by saying how you could make more money if you agree to a lower fee but a bigger cut of the door or something, but we always go back to the flat fee. If they make more money, great for them... we just want that fee. It is funny the kind of replies we get. A lot of promoters are genuine and they accept without question. Some almost get offended... they're invariably the kind of promoters who just think of the money they'll make on the night and nothing else. A bit like a bar who just wants to hike up the prices of drinks to make more money on their opening night, ignoring the fact that the following weekend customers will not return.

I'm not saying making money in music is easy... but a model based on ripping off people is not a good model.
 
Most municipalities run these gigs as a parks & rec opportunity or community service type of thing. That is not the same as the music business. If they want it to be a money making deal then they are competing with local venues and I would argue that is not the role of local government. They should be supporting the local businesses rather than competing with them.

I would not only tell them hell no, but I would complain to my township board.
 
At risk of not knowing all the deets, I'd vote bad deal here. Sounds like the sweat of the local bands is securing the funding for the national acts.
One main reason "business" like this continues to happen around musical events is that we musicians are mostly quiet about the contract side of gigs. I think it's largely from fear of looking silly for taking bad deals or playing for less money than others. Our silence generates a general lack of knowledge on the part of musicians.
Telling you how to run your life or career would be dumb of me since I'm not you. Risking that, I will say that it might be useful to "out" this promoter. There are simple ways of spreading the word. Post the contract on craigslist and (anonymous) social media. Ask the other bands if they got the same deal. Make certain your local city/county council rep knows this is how this promoter/organizer is handling public space concerts and why it concerns you. If you are affiliated with a musician's union, alert that union. One band saying no to this deal, doesn't push drive the snake oil salesmen out of town. It takes every, or at least most, musicians saying no. Local musicians with a high business IQs makes a stronger local scene. Good luck out there!
 
A community near me has concerts at a gazebo in a local park. I inquired to the organizer about playing there and his response is below (lightly edited to remove irrelevant info and protect the innocent). I'm curious about reactions to this.

...you provide sound system, we provide lights, you provide sound for opening act, first $400 goes to [name of venue], you get 75% of the balance, and……….95% of our patrons are here for the performer - if it’s [name of performer] nite, 95% of the patrons are here to see [name of performer]. So, do you have a following? If you get 150 at $15 per person, that’s $2250 minus $400 x 75%.
If that looks good to you, I’m interested…..AND one last thing - almost all the local acts get me sponsors…….the sponsors keep the admission at a low $15 and kids free. If any guys in your band can find a sponsor, that helps. I hope this does not sound too harsh, but the music business has changed, and the business side has to work, or……..the venue is no longer in business.​

I should add that the venue in question is a Township-owned park, not a private enterprise, and the local Township is a sponsor and there are multiple other corporate sponsors already in place.

After discussing with my band mates, we decided to pass. It didn't feel right to us.

Thoughts?
You supplied your own answers in the OP. It’s a government entity running the show. I won’t risk the topic or my membership with further comments.
 
I’m surprised by the number of comments here that imply the local government is running this. The OP seemed clear to me that this isn’t the case. It’s a public park and the town is a sponsor of the event. It isn’t an official town event. In fact, I’d bet the “sponsorship” is in just the form of waiving the park rental and permit fees and maybe supplying police/parks staff for the event. As others said, I’m sure the council and mayor don’t know—or care—the details of it. A local business applied to hold a community event, and they approved it. Everything else is between the promoter and the vendors/bands.
 
A community concert in the park that has a cover charge is not something I've ever seen.Is this really being put on by the community or is it just someone renting the gazebo for the night to make a buck?

I've never seen a 'concert/party in the park' run like this either. Back in North East Ohio concerts in the town square gazebo are a freakin' summertime fixture and I haven't heard of a single one running like this. Sounds like the promoter is renting the gazebo on their own dime. I could be wrong about that, but something smells fishy. The way the local government made it pay back in NEO was with the concession fees and running a beer garden.
 
No was a good choice.
A community near me has concerts at a gazebo in a local park. I inquired to the organizer about playing there and his response is below (lightly edited to remove irrelevant info and protect the innocent). I'm curious about reactions to this.

...you provide sound system, we provide lights, you provide sound for opening act, first $400 goes to [name of venue], you get 75% of the balance, and……….95% of our patrons are here for the performer - if it’s [name of performer] nite, 95% of the patrons are here to see [name of performer]. So, do you have a following? If you get 150 at $15 per person, that’s $2250 minus $400 x 75%.
If that looks good to you, I’m interested…..AND one last thing - almost all the local acts get me sponsors…….the sponsors keep the admission at a low $15 and kids free. If any guys in your band can find a sponsor, that helps. I hope this does not sound too harsh, but the music business has changed, and the business side has to work, or……..the venue is no longer in business.​

I should add that the venue in question is a Township-owned park, not a private enterprise, and the local Township is a sponsor and there are multiple other corporate sponsors already in place.

After discussing with my band mates, we decided to pass. It didn't feel right to us.

Thoughts?
 

Latest posts