• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

I really like the T-Bird headstock because it's ornate as well as just looks cool.
I saw this '30's Martin headstock and was blown away how much it looks like a Fender.
upload_2023-1-24_14-15-29.png


BTW...that's 1830. Now Martin's have one of the simplest flat-top, headstock designs.
 
It doesn't look like a Fender neck to me, Fender style, maybe he contoured it? I should ask him? I think I've insulted too many Fenderbird owners here already though. :laugh:
I think what makes a Fenderbird look odd is the maple headstock. I think it's the light wood and not the shape that throws me--and is why George's doesn't look off in any way.
 
I think I read someplace from whoever set them up that they were practically lying across the strings and no one in the shop could play it. I like to dig in so low low action like that is out of the question for me, for me string height is a compromise and I fiddle with them a lot.

I've always loved digging in, but am working on playing with low action. I'm finding I can still dig in to some extent; I just have to learn better control. That's a good thing.
 
I've always loved digging in, but am working on playing with low action. I'm finding I can still dig in to some extent; I just have to learn better control. That's a good thing.
The action on the Embassy is much lower than the action on my TBird(which is as low-not very-as I can get it w/o surgery). I'm not complaining, BTW.
Just realized: I can just say "my 'Bird" rather than "the 67NR" since I only have one('Bird, that is).