One of my "second wives" was from WVa. She had her first kid at 17. Said kid made her a grandmother at 34. I got as far as, "And what if your granddaughter..." before I was told to "Stop that! Just hush!"Virginians knock West Virginians.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
One of my "second wives" was from WVa. She had her first kid at 17. Said kid made her a grandmother at 34. I got as far as, "And what if your granddaughter..." before I was told to "Stop that! Just hush!"Virginians knock West Virginians.
And if it weren't for Becker, the Germans would have been first on the moon...Do Lucas parts ever not fail? I have had enough British machinery to expect the worst, and I'm never disappointed.
Those are expensive these days. It seems like all Thunderbirds are expensive these days. We need to get out there and reinforce the idea that they dive, are fragile, have no versatility, sound like mud, and are only for heavy metal on Tuesdays and only if you have a screamo singer. Did I miss anything? That should help.No idea what a reasonable price is, but this is beautiful. I'd be tempted to put gold p/u covers and a gold PG on.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Thass purty.No idea what a reasonable price is, but this is beautiful. I'd be tempted to put gold p/u covers and a gold PG on.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Love mine! It’s probably my best playing Gibson Tbird and the gold finish is to die for. Fortunately I only paid about $1100 for mine back in 2016. Most of the ones you find today are $2500 and up. I’d jump on one today if it were priced around $2000 or less and I didn’t already have one.
View attachment 5272243
But for $2500 or more I’d probably hold my cash for a nice one of a kind Gibson Tbird from the MOD collection instead.…
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
I don’t think I saw one at the GTG. It sounds pretty much like any modern (post 2000) Gibson Tbird (big and dark yet articulate on the top end). The big difference is the neck is super slim with well worn in rounded fretboard edges and the action is super low. It’s like Gibson spent a bit more time on fabrication of these basses, they just seem a step above my other Gibsons in playability and fit and finish, even better than my 2015, which is also very good, and much better than my 2022 NR which brings up the rear on fit and finish.What's the tone like? I'm sure I played one at the GTG but can't recall what it sounded like. Soooo many great basses there.
If that's true about the increased attention to detail, I'm willing to bet the same thing goes for the lefty models of the same year. Mine is perfect.I don’t think I saw one at the GTG. It sounds pretty much like any modern (post 2000) Gibson Tbird (big and dark yet articulate on the top end). The big difference is the neck is super slim with well worn in rounded fretboard edges and the action is super low. It’s like Gibson spent a bit more time on fabrication of these basses, they just seem a step above my other Gibsons in playability and fit and finish, even better than my 2015, which is also very good, and much better than my 2022 NR which brings up the rear on fit and finish.
I don’t think I saw one at the GTG. It sounds pretty much like any modern (post 2000) Gibson Tbird (big and dark yet articulate on the top end). The big difference is the neck is super slim with well worn in rounded fretboard edges and the action is super low. It’s like Gibson spent a bit more time on fabrication of these basses, they just seem a step above my other Gibsons in playability and fit and finish, even better than my 2015, which is also very good, and much better than my 2022 NR which brings up the rear on fit and finish.
I posted this in the Portaflex sub, but I’ll repost since we have a few geniuses here too.
I am swapping out the 1971 Eminence speaker in the B-15 for the year correct 1964 (44th week) CTS. Given the age, I plan on using new wiring and jack. I have Monoprice 16 gauge speaker wire and wondering if that is the appropriate gauge. Also, any recommendations on a quality 1/4” jack.
Electronically, it's the same as any other current Gibson Thunderbird.Does V have one? I feel like I played one, but can't recall where. Maybe I didn't, which is why I can't recall the tone.
Right, thanks. Just trying to recall why I think I played one.Electronically, it's the same as any other current Gibson Thunderbird.
Right, thanks. Just trying to recall why I think I played one.
No Goldie at this year's GTG, they are as Ken says.
The vintage Ampeg experts will be able to tell you what the B-15 had originally ( I'm guessing 18 AWG), but as far as functionality 16 AWG will be plenty.I posted this in the Portaflex sub, but I’ll repost since we have a few geniuses here too.
I am swapping out the 1971 Eminence speaker in the B-15 for the year correct 1964 (44th week) CTS. Given the age, I plan on using new wiring and jack. I have Monoprice 16 gauge speaker wire and wondering if that is the appropriate gauge. Also, any recommendations on a quality 1/4” jack.
The finish is very distinctive, because they didn't fill the pores before applying the metallic gold. It doesn't really show in pictures.Right, thanks. Just trying to recall why I think I played one.
Do you own one?
Is the pickup on the II placed a little south from the IV neck position? Or an optical illusion?![]()
The guy who ordered this bass saw the II that I built a few years ago. And he asked me to build one for him too.
During the build he changed his mind and asked me to add the second pickup.