• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Your NR Thundercaster is very nice looking!
Thanks. Can’t wait to have the body painted (Butterscotch Blonde) and the pickguard completed (Gloss Black) so I can put it all together and start playing it. It has all the potential to be my goto Tbird if all comes out alright.

sweet collection George…:thumbsup::drool:
Thx Chuck. I need to do an up to date group photo shoot, that black BaCH NR II on the right has been replaced with a Daphne Blue BaCH IV (scheduled for a pup change).

Love the pink finish! Looks fantastic.
That’s just the color of the raw wood in the pic (actually it’s more orange than shown). The pickguard in the pic is just a paper template, the final will be gloss black with a unique Fender/Gibson inspired logo that Irv is going to try to pull off for me.

If Pat Wilkins agrees, the bass body will end up Butterscotch Blonde in a couple of months. It has beautiful grain, so I’d hate to hide it but I am concerned that mahogany will throw an orange hue on the butterscotch finish if allowed to show through. If so it’ll just be butterscotch with maybe a white undercoat. The goal is to stick with an iconic Fender color on this bird, so a three tone Fender 1970’s era sunburst is always an option as is Sea Foam or Surf Green. Antigua burst is iconic Fender but I just don’t feel the love for that color. Mary Kay trans white would be cool, but again that orange hue in mahogany might make the whole thing look more like an orange cream-cicle. And whatever I do it has to color coordinate with a vintage tint Fender maple/maple neck. I’ll be looking for Pats guidance on this one.
 
Me and one of my Buddies were recently talking about those old muscle cars and how they felt so fast. The thing about the 60's cars if you were going 75MPH+ the engine and intake with the loud exhaust, wind noise, steering and handling, you knew you were going fast.
I have a Honda Accord VTEC V6 that is really fast for a smaller engine but now when I'm going 75MPH+ the wind, road noise, handling are all quieter and feels more stable. Half the time I don't even realize I'm speeding until I look at the Speedometer...or my wife tells me! lol
My firebird was a blast from accelerating from 0-100 MPH. Then it was frightening!
 
I'm with you Dave!
:laugh:
just kidding Irv……….:D
3D8024E3-131B-48BA-A428-68B61FFE4014.jpeg
 
My firebird was a blast from accelerating from 0-100 MPH. Then it was frightening!
Car designs have come a long way since then. My 1965 Mustang was also a blast from 0-100mph and a white knuckle floater at anything above that. I’d guess top speed of that Mustang was probably only about 120mph (had the 289 HiPo engine, around 270hp in a very light car). Won many a light to light race in that car. Many of the 350cuin cars I went up against could give it a good run for the money, some faster, many slower, but pretty much anything less than a 350 was no problem at all to beat in light to light racing (yes, the stupid things we did on Friday nights in the late 1970’s).

By comparison, my 1997 Porsche 911 gets to 100mph much much faster and then just hunkers down in a full squat as it climbs well over 120mph, zero float, perfectly planted. Top speed is over 170mph in the 911 IIRC, never had it near that, just about 130mph, and it behaved perfectly.
 
Car designs have come a long way since then. My 1965 Mustang was also a blast from 0-100mph and a white knuckle floater at anything above that. I’d guess top speed of that Mustang was probably only about 120mph (had the 289 HiPo engine, around 270hp in a very light car). Won many a light to light race in that car. Many of the 350cuin cars I went up against could give it a good run for the money, some faster, many slower, but pretty much anything less than a 350 was no problem at all to beat in light to light racing (yes, the stupid things we did on Friday nights in the late 1970’s).

By comparison, my 1997 Porsche 911 gets to 100mph much much faster and then just hunkers down in a full squat as it climbs well over 120mph, zero float, perfectly planted. Top speed is over 170mph in the 911 IIRC, never had it near that, just about 130mph, and it behaved perfectly.
You want pee your pants car ride, try 110 in a K car convertible on the Bee Line Highway. Inverted ground effects.