I knew you would have a good reply!Replacement parts are now available. Nothing available to help crazy though.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I knew you would have a good reply!Replacement parts are now available. Nothing available to help crazy though.
Very well done! Happy you finally got a 70s version.After I put the bridge cover on with Irv's shims that he made for it, I decided to go ahead and do a full clean and polish, including the whole body and neck, the frets, fretboard, and hardware, including the tuners. It does not look like a 48 year old Thunderbird.
There's a little wear on the headstock (cymbals? guitarist? singer's teeth? who knows). Bridge is on the deck. Action is nice and low. There is wear on the back, but nothing bad. It has been played; especially on the money frets. But 6 and above are divot free. It may have been crowned and leveled at some point. I'm not sure. There is a lot of life left in the frets, certainly more than I'll take off in the next twenty years (knock on wood).
I love this Thunderbird.
View attachment 7197504
View attachment 7197505
View attachment 7197508
View attachment 7197517
View attachment 7197520
View attachment 7197521View attachment 7197522
View attachment 7197523
They are a little timid in some ways compared to the 60s (amps have knobs for a reason)--but the tone is just fine IMO. And everyone has been worn out by how picky I can be with tone. I never thought of it, but I would have been happy with sidewinders in the '66 NR.Thanks my friend. I can't wait to see and hear your '79. I seriously don't get why some were/are critical of the sidewinders. I've played it through the SVT, the TT 800, and the Carbine. Sure, there is a slight variation among the three. Different flavors of awesome. Only thing left is to find the right screw to fill the hole where the missing Neck pickup cover was. I'd love to have the cover, but I'd never put it on.
I love the neck angle. Or lack thereof.
I'm trying using a pick with the bridge cover on. This could be a good thing. Or not. We'll see.
Congrats! You have a great family!Brand new here! View attachment 7197671Started learning just a couple months ago. Fell in love with the look of the Thunderbird. While I was away, my wife and son took a trip to a local guitar show and got me a surprise! Of the few basses I have, this is my favorite to play. Fits me best and sounds soo good. I can see how it's not for everyone, but I can see how people simply fall in love with it. Good wide leather strap keeps me from worrying about neck dive too.
Stop. I'm starting to want one of those.Consider me a fan as well.
![]()

Sure! I noticed quite a few had member numbers and besides, if something catastrophic ever happened to my T-bird, I'd for sure get another.Welcome to Talkbass and the Thunderbird club, please feel free to post in the thread, we enjoy the company and encourage questions, even if they have been asked many times.
I keep the club's roster of members, if you'd like me to add you to it, just let me know![]()
Sure! I noticed quite a few had member numbers and besides, if something catastrophic ever happened to my T-bird, I'd for sure get another.
You are the talent!My situation is the opposite, everyplace we place has FOH, I will never haul a PA or do sound - it isn't worth it.
Love it- congrats Marshall!After I put the bridge cover on with Irv's shims that he made for it, I decided to go ahead and do a full clean and polish, including the whole body and neck, the frets, fretboard, and hardware, including the tuners. It does not look like a 48 year old Thunderbird.
There's a little wear on the headstock (cymbals? guitarist? singer's teeth? who knows). Bridge is on the deck. Action is nice and low. There is wear on the back, but nothing bad. It has been played; especially on the money frets. But 6 and above are divot free. It may have been crowned and leveled at some point. I'm not sure. There is a lot of life left in the frets, certainly more than I'll take off in the next twenty years (knock on wood).
I love this Thunderbird.
View attachment 7197504
View attachment 7197505
View attachment 7197508
View attachment 7197517
View attachment 7197520
View attachment 7197521View attachment 7197522
View attachment 7197523
You are the talent!
Brand new here! View attachment 7197671Started learning just a couple months ago. Fell in love with the look of the Thunderbird. While I was away, my wife and son took a trip to a local guitar show and got me a surprise! Of the few basses I have, this is my favorite to play. Fits me best and sounds soo good. I can see how it's not for everyone, but I can see how people simply fall in love with it. Good wide leather strap keeps me from worrying about neck dive too.
Sidewinders timid?They are a little timid in some ways compared to the 60s (amps have knobs for a reason)--but the tone is just fine IMO. And everyone has been worn out by how picky I can be with tone. I never thought of, but I wold have been happy with sidewinders in the '66 NR.
They sure aren’t in mine.Sidewinders timid?
Now way!
I'm sure there are situations where I'd be happy with them. I just haven't found one yet. Next Friday I'll be on a silent stage. Different venue from last year's Good Friday service, but if the setup and sound person are anything like last year's (which was not silent stage), it may be the first time I've really been happy with such.For sure there is a point where the noise obliterates the signal. I don't play in those situations.
In my cover band, if I bring the bass up loud enough to not have to dig in and really be happy with the tone, it's often too loud on stage.
With in-ears, I can hear my bass and vox. I don't get hand fatigue or blow my voice. It's way more fun!
Playing upright with in-ears is also way easier and my intonation is better.
I'm sure there are situations where I'd be happy with them. I just haven't found one yet. Next Friday I'll be on a silent stage. Different venue from last year's Good Friday service, but if the setup and sound person are anything like last year's (which was not silent stage), it may be the first time I've really been happy with such.For sure there is a point where the noise obliterates the signal. I don't play in those situations.
In my cover band, if I bring the bass up loud enough to not have to dig in and really be happy with the tone, it's often too loud on stage.
With in-ears, I can hear my bass and vox. I don't get hand fatigue or blow my voice. It's way more fun!
Playing upright with in-ears is also way easier and my intonation is better.
Keep us posted!They are a little timid in some ways compared to the 60s (amps have knobs for a reason)--but the tone is just fine IMO. And everyone has been worn out by how picky I can be with tone. I never thought of it, but I would have been happy with sidewinders in the '66 NR.
Keep us posted!They are a little timid in some ways compared to the 60s (amps have knobs for a reason)--but the tone is just fine IMO. And everyone has been worn out by how picky I can be with tone. I never thought of it, but I would have been happy with sidewinders in the '66 NR.