• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Let's go!....
IMG_4701.jpeg
IMG_4699.jpeg
 
Any Tbird owners here put an active preamp in their bass?
I know most people go the preamp pedal route but thinking about it. I like fiddling with the onboard preamp right on the bass. I think it would fit. Was thinking of a bartolini 3 band.



It might fit, and they have a gold option.

An EMG P/J set would likely be a downgrade from the 760’s. I have that same bass, color and all. I also have a number of actual Gibson ‘birds, and the Epiphone has its own sound compared to the my Gibsons. The Gibsons in my stable all have some form of vintage style boutique Thunderbird pickup, such as, the actual Gibson vintage re-issue pickups, Lollar, Novak, Gemini UK, and Thunderbucker 66’s. The Epiphone VP sounds very different than all those.
What’s your fav out of that bunch of pickups? How would you compare them to modern TB pickups?

Just got a Tbird with vintage style pickups and while I appreciate the clarity, they seem less ballsy. (Compared to what I remember modern tbird pups sounding like)
 
Last edited:
Any Tbird owners here put an active preamp in their bass?
I know most people go the preamp pedal route but thinking about it. I like fiddling with the onboard preamp right on the bass. I think it would fit. Was thinking of a bartolini 3 band.



What’s your fav out of that bunch of pickups? How would you compare them to modern TB pickups?

Just got a Tbird with vintage style pickups and while I appreciate the clarity, they seem less ballsy. (Compared to what I remember modern tbird pups sounding like)




I am not a fan of the modern TB+ pickups. I just prefer vintage style pickups. Not only the sound but the look.

This:
IMG_6765.jpeg


more than this:
IMG_6747.jpeg


Of all the ones I have, I like the Gibson vintage re-issues the best. One set I have is a pair of “lead” or bridge pickups. When I bought my first set vintage re-issues, direct from Gibson, there was no choice for a set, or to select “lead” or “rhythm”, so I got two “lead” pickups.

The second set of Gibson re-issues I got were a used pair that had come from a 2021 NR. This “set” were marked “lead” and “rhy”. The lead gave a reading of 8.5K, while the “rhy” pickup read 7.4K. I like both sets in the basses they are in.

The other notable set of pickups I have are from Gemini(UK), named the “Devastator” and I really also like those, they’re pretty hot, but they cut through really well, with just the right amount of grit…


The ‘bird you got with vintage pickups, were they swapped out, or are we talking about an Epiphone vintage pro or something?

Putting vintage style pickups in a modern Gibson IV that originally came with TB+ pickups is a different situation than getting a “Vintage” modeled Epiphone. I have an Epiphone VP and is is not as ballsey as my Gibsons with vintage style pickups. That said, I do like the Epiphone a lot, it has its own sound.
 
Any Tbird owners here put an active preamp in their bass?
I know most people go the preamp pedal route but thinking about it. I like fiddling with the onboard preamp right on the bass. I think it would fit. Was thinking of a bartolini 3 band.



What’s your fav out of that bunch of pickups? How would you compare them to modern TB pickups?

Just got a Tbird with vintage style pickups and while I appreciate the clarity, they seem less ballsy. (Compared to what I remember modern tbird pups sounding like)
On the preamp front I have several Tbirds I’ve modified to active. A Goth Tbird with Bartolini pickups and an Aguilar OBP-2 preamp (two band) I call the FrankenGoth. A SilverGoth Tbird with two stock pickups plus a DiMarzo One Mudbucker at the neck with an Aguilar OBP-2 preamp. An Acasia Pink Tbird NonReverse with a Fully optioned John East preamp with Nordstrand Zen pickups. And a ThunderWick Tbird that I’m currently building to Warwick Thumb specs with MEC active Jazz pickups and an MEC 2 band preamp.

The Wick isn’t done yet, so no idea how it sounds. The FrankenGoth sounds fantastic, very Baritone Guitarish with crisp crystal clear ringing notes from bass to treble, largely because of the very clean Bart pickups. The SilverGoth is a beast, nice and dark but the Mudbucker can be surprisingly clean and clear as well. The Acasia is an insanely flexible tone monster, to a fault. It has too many settings, I can find a great sound on it but struggle to find that same sound again if I mess with any of the knobs. The two band aggies are super quick to dial in on the fly and sound great. I suspect the MEC will be similar.

One if the two band Aggies is configured as a 4 knob in Volume, Volume, bass, Treble, with a coil split switch. The other Aggie is configured in Volume (push/pull active passive), Treb/bass stack, and a blend knob that’s tied into the Mudbucker into a 4 position pickup selector switch (mid pup, mid plus bridge in series, mid plus bridge in parallel, bridge pup), tons of sound options on this one and sounds great in passive mode as well.

I’m not as fond of the three band preamps out there, sure there’s more flexibility, but again, I struggle with the repeatability and constantly hunting for that sound I liked the last time I played.
 
I am not a fan of the modern TB+ pickups. I just prefer vintage style pickups. Not only the sound but the look.

This:
View attachment 7240891

more than this:
View attachment 7240892

Of all the ones I have, I like the Gibson vintage re-issues the best. One set I have is a pair of “lead” or bridge pickups. When I bought my first set vintage re-issues, direct from Gibson, there was no choice for a set, or to select “lead” or “rhythm”, so I got two “lead” pickups.

The second set of Gibson re-issues I got were a used pair that had come from a 2021 NR. This “set” were marked “lead” and “rhy”. The lead gave a reading of 8.5K, while the “rhy” pickup read 7.4K. I like both sets in the basses they are in.

The other notable set of pickups I have are from Gemini(UK), named the “Devastator” and I really also like those, they’re pretty hot, but they cut through really well, with just the right amount of grit…


The ‘bird you got with vintage pickups, were they swapped out, or are we talking about an Epiphone vintage pro or something?

Putting vintage style pickups in a modern Gibson IV that originally came with TB+ pickups is a different situation than getting a “Vintage” modeled Epiphone. I have an Epiphone VP and is is not as ballsey as my Gibsons with vintage style pickups. That said, I do like the Epiphone a lot, it has its own sound.

That chromed out cherry Bird is just THE SEX BOMB!

I know, I said that once before.........Still true.
 
I am not a fan of the modern TB+ pickups. I just prefer vintage style pickups. Not only the sound but the look.

This:
View attachment 7240891

more than this:
View attachment 7240892

Of all the ones I have, I like the Gibson vintage re-issues the best. One set I have is a pair of “lead” or bridge pickups. When I bought my first set vintage re-issues, direct from Gibson, there was no choice for a set, or to select “lead” or “rhythm”, so I got two “lead” pickups.

The second set of Gibson re-issues I got were a used pair that had come from a 2021 NR. This “set” were marked “lead” and “rhy”. The lead gave a reading of 8.5K, while the “rhy” pickup read 7.4K. I like both sets in the basses they are in.

The other notable set of pickups I have are from Gemini(UK), named the “Devastator” and I really also like those, they’re pretty hot, but they cut through really well, with just the right amount of grit…


The ‘bird you got with vintage pickups, were they swapped out, or are we talking about an Epiphone vintage pro or something?

Putting vintage style pickups in a modern Gibson IV that originally came with TB+ pickups is a different situation than getting a “Vintage” modeled Epiphone. I have an Epiphone VP and is is not as ballsey as my Gibsons with vintage style pickups. That said, I do like the Epiphone a lot, it has its own sound.
It’s a 2000 Gibson Thunderbird. Pickups were swapped for thunderbuckers 66s. I think they sound really good, def impressed by the clarity. I think they don’t make them anymore.
I played a Gibson Nikki six a few weeks ago, I think it had the standard modern hot tbird pups with no control knobs, and I thought that bass sounded really good too. It’s kinda hard to choose lol.

I agree tho, this look with the vintage pups is hard to beat. I just got the bass so just gonna enjoy it as is but I think the awesome look is def a big part of keeping it as is. Might try a preamp down the line with these pups to see what it sounds like.

Heres a pic, I’ll add some in better lighting in the next few days. I freaking love this bass. Ebony board, natural finish which I don’t see as much, and it’s super light!!( especially compared to any other tbird I’ve played). I was considering and epi but really glad I found this one. Has some nice upgrades, ultra light tuners, I think the bridge and brass nut aren’t original, and the upgraded pups
IMG_3376.jpeg

On the preamp front I have several Tbirds I’ve modified to active. A Goth Tbird with Bartolini pickups and an Aguilar OBP-2 preamp (two band) I call the FrankenGoth. A SilverGoth Tbird with two stock pickups plus a DiMarzo One Mudbucker at the neck with an Aguilar OBP-2 preamp. An Acasia Pink Tbird NonReverse with a Fully optioned John East preamp with Nordstrand Zen pickups. And a ThunderWick Tbird that I’m currently building to Warwick Thumb specs with MEC active Jazz pickups and an MEC 2 band preamp.

The Wick isn’t done yet, so no idea how it sounds. The FrankenGoth sounds fantastic, very Baritone Guitarish with crisp crystal clear ringing notes from bass to treble, largely because of the very clean Bart pickups. The SilverGoth is a beast, nice and dark but the Mudbucker can be surprisingly clean and clear as well. The Acasia is an insanely flexible tone monster, to a fault. It has too many settings, I can find a great sound on it but struggle to find that same sound again if I mess with any of the knobs. The two band aggies are super quick to dial in on the fly and sound great. I suspect the MEC will be similar.

One if the two band Aggies is configured as a 4 knob in Volume, Volume, bass, Treble, with a coil split switch. The other Aggie is configured in Volume (push/pull active passive), Treb/bass stack, and a blend knob that’s tied into the Mudbucker into a 4 position pickup selector switch (mid pup, mid plus bridge in series, mid plus bridge in parallel, bridge pup), tons of sound options on this one and sounds great in passive mode as well.

I’m not as fond of the three band preamps out there, sure there’s more flexibility, but again, I struggle with the repeatability and constantly hunting for that sound I liked the last time I played.
Right on thanks for the input! Good to know a preamp can work in there.
So originally before I even got the bass I had in my mind that I would put in bartolini pups and preamp in it. I know not everyone likes them but I love barts. It’s kinda the perfect bass sound in my head, and especially I think they’re so easy to record. They sound great in any mix.
My only other bass is a fender 62 reissue J bass which I love so the idea was to have a vintage passive low output single coil bass, and an active more aggressive bass.
 
There you go, it's done!





Note that the original bushings measure 18mm, the Gotoh bushings measure 17.6mm.
You'll need to make up for this slight difference by, for example, wrapping a one-centimeter strip of aluminum tape (If you have any other ideas, please share them)

I wasn't sure about using Gotoh screws because several reviews on Thomann mentioned that they break when tightening. Using a 2mm drill bit, I didn't have any problems.
If this helps anyone.
 
It’s a 2000 Gibson Thunderbird. Pickups were swapped for thunderbuckers 66s.
If that’s a natural finish, then is essentially (well, exactly) like my 2001 natural when I bought it. It also came with the Thunderbucker 66’s, a Hipshot bridge (which I changed for a Babicz), and Hipshot USA ultralights. I put a black pg on mine.

I was not a huge fan of the Thunderbuckers at first, but I have come to like them a lot. Mine is strung with 50-110 nickels (I think SIT “Rock Brights, which I think have been re-named?). Also mine is tuned Eb.
image.jpg
 
I am not a fan of the modern TB+ pickups. I just prefer vintage style pickups. Not only the sound but the look.

This:
View attachment 7240891

more than this:
View attachment 7240892

Of all the ones I have, I like the Gibson vintage re-issues the best. One set I have is a pair of “lead” or bridge pickups. When I bought my first set vintage re-issues, direct from Gibson, there was no choice for a set, or to select “lead” or “rhythm”, so I got two “lead” pickups.

The second set of Gibson re-issues I got were a used pair that had come from a 2021 NR. This “set” were marked “lead” and “rhy”. The lead gave a reading of 8.5K, while the “rhy” pickup read 7.4K. I like both sets in the basses they are in.

The other notable set of pickups I have are from Gemini(UK), named the “Devastator” and I really also like those, they’re pretty hot, but they cut through really well, with just the right amount of grit…


The ‘bird you got with vintage pickups, were they swapped out, or are we talking about an Epiphone vintage pro or something?

Putting vintage style pickups in a modern Gibson IV that originally came with TB+ pickups is a different situation than getting a “Vintage” modeled Epiphone. I have an Epiphone VP and is is not as ballsey as my Gibsons with vintage style pickups. That said, I do like the Epiphone a lot, it has its own sound.
Yep Gibson reissues at $129 are a great bargain for an Alnico vintage tone. I like the modern ceramic pickup tone too. It’s all good.
 
Last edited:
It’s a 2000 Gibson Thunderbird. Pickups were swapped for thunderbuckers 66s. I think they sound really good, def impressed by the clarity. I think they don’t make them anymore.
I played a Gibson Nikki six a few weeks ago, I think it had the standard modern hot tbird pups with no control knobs, and I thought that bass sounded really good too. It’s kinda hard to choose lol.

I agree tho, this look with the vintage pups is hard to beat. I just got the bass so just gonna enjoy it as is but I think the awesome look is def a big part of keeping it as is. Might try a preamp down the line with these pups to see what it sounds like.

Heres a pic, I’ll add some in better lighting in the next few days. I freaking love this bass. Ebony board, natural finish which I don’t see as much, and it’s super light!!( especially compared to any other tbird I’ve played). I was considering and epi but really glad I found this one. Has some nice upgrades, ultra light tuners, I think the bridge and brass nut aren’t original, and the upgraded pups
View attachment 7240942

Right on thanks for the input! Good to know a preamp can work in there.
So originally before I even got the bass I had in my mind that I would put in bartolini pups and preamp in it. I know not everyone likes them but I love barts. It’s kinda the perfect bass sound in my head, and especially I think they’re so easy to record. They sound great in any mix.
My only other bass is a fender 62 reissue J bass which I love so the idea was to have a vintage passive low output single coil bass, and an active more aggressive bass.
Many here like Tbird + pickups with stainless strings like the SIT Power Steels. There have been a few versions of them over the years. Many really like them from circa ‘01.