yep....Toosie T?....great year '68...Agree. Love the thinner vintage bodies.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
yep....Toosie T?....great year '68...Agree. Love the thinner vintage bodies.
I wish.Ha! You must be getting ready to retire and will spend while you’re still on the gravy train.
Thankfully they aren't shipping them in bright red or white (or worse, a deep blue). And the prices are up there (victims in part of the economy, no doubt).1.6 nut. Oh well. At least it doesn’t have a volute.
This.I agree about a thicker body. It was my '64 II and most '60s Japanese basses that had 1-1/4" thick bodies that convinced me to make all my custom basses 1-1/4" thick. A thin body w/ ergonomic tapers, bevels & scallops conforms to your body and is lighter and far more comfortable to play. A thicker, heavier body wouldn't be a selling point for me.
Yeah, I have no need for a black Thunderbird. Unless, of course, a ridiculous deal showed up on a Nikki or something equally cool. And while burst is fine, it's seldom as sexy as certain colors.I’m happy Gibson is doing a reverse again. But if I wanted to buy another Thunderbird, the one @Ringhammer is selling would be at the top of the list. A super deal. I have way too many black Thunderbirds. Thank goodness his isn’t a different color. Or I would be in major trouble.
![]()
Gibson Thunderbird Bass 1997 - musical instruments - by owner - sale - craigslist
This is a 1997 Gibson Thunderbird. The tuners have been upgraded to HipShot USA ultra-lites. The bridge has been upgraded to a Chrome Babicz, and the pick ups are genuine Gibson vintage reissues....sfbay.craigslist.org
Same.Nut width is 1.6 I can live with it but I much prefer a 1.5 myself.
Don't knock it until you've tried it. Especially the Hawaiian Trippy Slugs. Coming soon to a Controlled Substance List near you.Yuck. Slugs? No wonder. Who eats those things?
Welcome, club member or not!Hey folks, not a club member but I'm curious about Thunderbird and basses. Since there's no upper horn and the strap button is set so far up the neck, I am curious if this makes the bass hang awkwardly, like the lower frets would be a farther reach due to hanging point of the body. Does that make sense? Is it a non-issue, or something to get used to coming from a more traditional Fender-style bass background? I know neck dive is a complaint some people have, but I don't see much info about the reach. I unfortunately do not have a Tbird available locally to test the waters.
because there hasn't been "real" Thunderbirds in over 30 yrs imho....I got my '13 NR because I couldn't find a 60's one I could afford....then I really got into the TB+ with LB tapes and added a Hipshot bridge but that bass couldn't be further away from a late 60's Bird....although ymmv of course, the TBird went away with the big headstock.....So what are we calling the new Thunderbird? The Non-Non-Reverse Thunderbird?
What a hot mess.
I wonder how long it will take Gibson to abandon this one again. Like they've abandoned almost any bass they've released in the past 30 years.
Hey folks, not a club member but I'm curious about Thunderbird and basses. Since there's no upper horn and the strap button is set so far up the neck, I am curious if this makes the bass hang awkwardly, like the lower frets would be a farther reach due to hanging point of the body. Does that make sense? Is it a non-issue, or something to get used to coming from a more traditional Fender-style bass background? I know neck dive is a complaint some people have, but I don't see much info about the reach. I unfortunately do not have a Tbird available locally to test the waters.
This is why I'm a fan of Babicz bridges. It's all about the visuals.And I’m shallow. The Babicz looks better IMO.
So I got to check out the new 2026 Thunderbird earlier this week and I was pretty impressed. In a nutshell it feels like the new Nonreverse but with a Reverse body. I've stopped comparing every new irritation of the Thunderbird to the 60's birds and I am just trying to evaluate them on their own merits. This just a short immediate reaction to the bass having just unboxed it.

FSO?...WT7?...It is a lot about how you "wear" the bass, on your body, since Thunderbirds are almost my exclusive choice I have my own preferences based on my body, strap length preference and where the strap pins are on the bass. I seem most comfortable with the bass a little above my waist and slightly favoring the body to my right hip, I don't have to work to get it there, that just seems to be where the bass wants to be on me. What is less common for me would be the whole backside of the bass pressed against my stomach, while I'm sure it happens during the course of a show, it's just not typical for me.
Like so........
![]()
I'm not entirely sure I followed on the first part, but no if I do follow. But I've been playing one since '81/82 and they feel custom made for me. But generally for a Thunderbird a slightly longer strap will help the general playing feel, and one that has suede or something on the back for grip. A cheap slick strap is almost asking for it to be an unpleasant experience.Hey folks, not a club member but I'm curious about Thunderbird and basses. Since there's no upper horn and the strap button is set so far up the neck, I am curious if this makes the bass hang awkwardly, like the lower frets would be a farther reach due to hanging point of the body. Does that make sense? Is it a non-issue, or something to get used to coming from a more traditional Fender-style bass background? I know neck dive is a complaint some people have, but I don't see much info about the reach. I unfortunately do not have a Tbird available locally to test the waters.
Exactly. Something like this:"Predicted to sell soon."
At that price it should come with a free delivery...
...truck.
Love the use of the Darkstar. Among other things.In progress - should be playable by early next week (or sooner)
View attachment 7459622
View attachment 7459624
View attachment 7459625
like SRV's tech, used to endlessly spend time with his head inside the chassis' of Stevie's amps after the shows.....tune tune tune...only thing that matters is the tone....truly treated the amp as a musical instrument and incessantly tuned them the way Stradivarius did their violins.....I've often heard of them. Never heard or seen one that I know of. Maybe on a recording, possibly.
What makes them so special? Using the most expensive parts or unique design, or both?
So I got to check out the new 2026 Thunderbird earlier this week and I was pretty impressed. In a nutshell it feels like the new Nonreverse but with a Reverse body. I've stopped comparing every new irritation of the Thunderbird to the 60's birds and I am just trying to evaluate them on their own merits. This just a short immediate reaction to the bass having just unboxed it.
FSO?...WT7?...
Don't let us stop you.Dammit..the urge to buy this increases.
My entire budget for modifying anything is being completely blown for many years by modifying a car. Oh, well. That won't prevent enabling others to spend money I don't currently have, but that they just might have. Money is evil. You have to get rid of it before it causes you to be a bad person. Buying Thunderbirds is a path to virtue.Hahaha I am quite fortunate, between modifying cars and basses (which I also always modify), my wife is usually encouraging me to spend money on these kinds of things.
Luckily my business is in aftermarket car parts so I can access parts a lot cheaper for myself.. If anyone out there is into modding their cars we do ship globally (and our warehouses are in the US)
This next bass I get has some significance to its meaning, so a lot less $ concern with it...when I find the right one I will be going all in on everything I want to make it perfect.