So, you're comparing a small boutique builder with Gibson? Why?
If they couldn't build a "better" bass with more attention to smaller detail and options what would be the point?
Further, since there have been quite a few iterations of Thunderbirds just from Gibson over the years, your statement that a copy would for instance "crush" a '64 Thunderbird II or a '67 Non Reverse has no basis in fact. Tone is at best, subjective.
Thanks, go ahead and buy one (if you can even get it in the country) and maybe report back.
No thanks, about the "reporting back" aspect.
It's a shame how some "Thunderbird" fans represent themselves, you included.
I clearly stated no dis-respect for Gibson/epi.
I don't care to babble about vintage etc and the great T-Birds of the past.
I thought it was an interesting offer I posted, how Japanese builders of quality "honored" an iconic American shape with their builds, and I hear drivel by a 2nd-Class Indy builder about too many knobs on "Nipponese" basses.
You can take back your wonderful pride about this club, at least for some of the lot. Others- they respond with maturity and courtesy- Good on them.
You:
Seriously, grow up.
, it pains me to even type them but I'll try. Poison
. I think my hair weighed me down ya know?, its a fast sport.......yaaaaaawwnnn....