Been busy (playing golf today, hey I'm retired, gotta do somethin) and trying to catch up on this dang fast moving thread.
Anyway, my preference in basses is typically in fancy woods and finishes. I have dozens of top end fancy schmancy basses in my collection. But oddly enough, for some reason I can't explain, the TBird design just doesn't appeal to me in quilted or spalted or Burl or 5A Curley maple or a lot of other fancy options that look great on virtually every other bass design. YMMV, and that's cool, but for me a cool paint job maybe with some pinstriping or a subtle flamed maple visible thru a tinted gloss body stain would be perfect. So yes, I can imagine that bass in a nitro color and I'm sure it would rock.
Would it crush anything Gibson makes, quality/tone/or otherwise? Last I checked there wasn't any general consensus on which bass is the best bass in the world (well, maybe the mothman bass is near the top). So I kinda gotta disagree with you on the "crush any Gibson" comment.
Look at my tagline, it's there for a reason, it's a fundamental truth. A bass is a tool. Like any tool, some can be cheaper than others or built stronger than others or be more popular than others but at the end of the day it's still a tool. And all that really matters is having the right tool for the job. If that right tool for you is a Japanese bass, that's cool but don't assume that's the right tool for everybody. I can easily envision settings where a $300 Eppi Goth would be a better selection for me than a fancy top TUNE bass, or situations where a TUNE might be a better option than a much fancier and much better built and much more expensive Alembic TBird. Just sayin.