• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

String quandary on my VP. I don't know that there's an answer for this, but hey, it's forum and who knows. At home it's bright and aggressive. With my rig at church (Ampeg V4-BH 100w all tube + Ampeg Heritage 410 cab), it's not as bright or punchy. The bright part is not necessarily an issue for me. I like thick not clank. Punchy thickness but with big lows might be the best way to describe what I tend to like. I'm not trying to cut through anything. But don't want hallow or dull thud.

Strings thus far:
GHS Boomers- OK, but no magic.

GHS Pressurewounds (alloy 52)- Normally really punchy with good mids. They sound really good and I could be happy with it, but not in the "amazing" category.

TI Infeld Supperalloy (alloy 52)- Very nice at home but kind of bland with that rig. These are on my '64 Bird and are beyond amazing. Not so much on anything else.

TI Flats- Used them today and they seem closer to thick and punchy. Sounded better than I expected. I did end up turning the bridge PUP off about half the time. Seemed to add some punch, or something good. With my '64, which is my gold standard, I am amazed with either both PUPs or neck. With the VP it seems to suck a little something out. I've tried rolling the bridge back a little and it's just another degree of nice.

Options:
I'm not sure if I should throw the originals (whatever they are) back on to see if a bright string adds a little magic or what.

I have some TI Jazz rounds, which I just found to be amazing on my new '64 Epi Embassy, when I thought brighter on a darkish bass was needed. But I was not really wanting to "copy" another bass. But don't mind doing so if that's the trick. My '76 sounds great with Fender flats--another shock. But it works.

I've been playing around with PUP height as well. Both up equally, Bridge down a fair amount in seeking the ideal mix.

After a while it becomes frustrating. I love the VP and not complaining about it, just the process of figuring out the best "marriage" with strings.
 
String quandary on my VP. I don't know that there's an answer for this, but hey, it's forum and who knows. At home it's bright and aggressive. With my rig at church (Ampeg V4-BH 100w all tube + Ampeg Heritage 410 cab), it's not as bright or punchy. The bright part is not necessarily an issue for me. I like thick not clank. Punchy thickness but with big lows might be the best way to describe what I tend to like. I'm not trying to cut through anything. But don't want hallow or dull thud.

Strings thus far:
GHS Boomers- OK, but no magic.

GHS Pressurewounds (alloy 52)- Normally really punchy with good mids. They sound really good and I could be happy with it, but not in the "amazing" category.

TI Infeld Supperalloy (alloy 52)- Very nice at home but kind of bland with that rig. These are on my '64 Bird and are beyond amazing. Not so much on anything else.

TI Flats- Used them today and they seem closer to thick and punchy. Sounded better than I expected. I did end up turning the bridge PUP off about half the time. Seemed to add some punch, or something good. With my '64, which is my gold standard, I am amazed with either both PUPs or neck. With the VP it seems to suck a little something out. I've tried rolling the bridge back a little and it's just another degree of nice.

Options:
I'm not sure if I should throw the originals (whatever they are) back on to see if a bright string adds a little magic or what.

I have some TI Jazz rounds, which I just found to be amazing on my new '64 Epi Embassy, when I thought brighter on a darkish bass was needed. But I was not really wanting to "copy" another bass. But don't mind doing so if that's the trick. My '76 sounds great with Fender flats--another shock. But it works.

I've been playing around with PUP height as well. Both up equally, Bridge down a fair amount in seeking the ideal mix.

After a while it becomes frustrating. I love the VP and not complaining about it, just the process of figuring out the best "marriage" with strings.
Hmm. You're happy with the sound at home but not through the church rig. I'd start with EQing things differently at the church. Could be the rig or the room is messing up the sound. And that doesn't cost you a set of strings to find out.
 
Might be their real hair.



Makes me want to watch some Kojak ("who loves ya' baby?")

962824b5cb659301edf99c2de2006042.jpg
 
Hmm. You're happy with the sound at home but not through the church rig. I'd start with EQing things differently at the church. Could be the rig or the room is messing up the sound. And that doesn't cost you a set of strings to find out.
I hadn't really thought of that. Reason being is that I almost never touch my amp at church, no matter the bass. I've gotten so used to almost ignoring the EQ on it. Everything else sound good as is (mostly flat w/very slight boost in bass and mids). Thanks to reminding me those knobs are there for a reason!

But I can't go on how things sound at home. I've learned that's not an indication how things will sound elsewhere at all. My '64 Bird is very average sounding at home. Play it someplace else and magic comes out of that thing!
 
Last edited:
I hadn't really thought of that. Reason being is that I almost never touch my amp at church, no matter the bass. I've gotten so used to almost ignoring the EQ on it. Everything else sound good as is (mostly flat w/very slight boost in bass and mids). Thanks to reminding me those knobs are there for a reason!

But I can't go on how things sound at home. I've learned that's not a indication how things will sound elsewhere at all.

Are you sure no one else touched the knobs? What about on the board?
 
Are you sure no one else touched the knobs? What about on the board?
No, they are all the same. As for what comes out of the FOH that's a different story. The sound guy's understanding of EQing and what bass sounds like is far different than mine. That's one reason I still use a good sized rig, not just for my personal platform presence!
 
I hadn't really thought of that. Reason being is that I almost never touch my amp at church, no matter the bass. I've gotten so used to almost ignoring the EQ on it. Everything else sound good as is (mostly flat w/very slight boost in bass and mids). Thanks to reminding me those knobs are there for a reason!

But I can't go on how things sound at home. I've learned that's not a indication how things will sound elsewhere at all.
Oh, no! You can have everything sounding perfect at home and get to a room that's boomy or sucks up all the lows and ya gotta start over:banghead:. I'm not familiar with that head but I did have a blue line SVT/810 cab. OK, looked at pics online. Lotta knobs and switches to fool with on that thing. Try standing as far as your longest cord will reach and see how it sounds. Remember, it doesn't matter how it sounds to you, but how it sounds to the "audience".<Addendum>We never have FOH so all my experience is with us handling our sound.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't look like the same band. I suppose that it is possible that more than one band has that name. Here is the Retro Boogie I saw.

Our band is called "The Driftwoods"-had the name about 20 years. There's at least one other band(bluegrass)in FL with that name and one in VA(I think). There are prolly a bunch o' bands called "Retro Boogie" or some derivation.
 
String quandary on my VP. I don't know that there's an answer for this, but hey, it's forum and who knows. At home it's bright and aggressive. With my rig at church (Ampeg V4-BH 100w all tube + Ampeg Heritage 410 cab), it's not as bright or punchy. The bright part is not necessarily an issue for me. I like thick not clank. Punchy thickness but with big lows might be the best way to describe what I tend to like. I'm not trying to cut through anything. But don't want hallow or dull thud.

Strings thus far:
GHS Boomers- OK, but no magic.

GHS Pressurewounds (alloy 52)- Normally really punchy with good mids. They sound really good and I could be happy with it, but not in the "amazing" category.

TI Infeld Supperalloy (alloy 52)- Very nice at home but kind of bland with that rig. These are on my '64 Bird and are beyond amazing. Not so much on anything else.

TI Flats- Used them today and they seem closer to thick and punchy. Sounded better than I expected. I did end up turning the bridge PUP off about half the time. Seemed to add some punch, or something good. With my '64, which is my gold standard, I am amazed with either both PUPs or neck. With the VP it seems to suck a little something out. I've tried rolling the bridge back a little and it's just another degree of nice.

Options:
I'm not sure if I should throw the originals (whatever they are) back on to see if a bright string adds a little magic or what.

I have some TI Jazz rounds, which I just found to be amazing on my new '64 Epi Embassy, when I thought brighter on a darkish bass was needed. But I was not really wanting to "copy" another bass. But don't mind doing so if that's the trick. My '76 sounds great with Fender flats--another shock. But it works.

I've been playing around with PUP height as well. Both up equally, Bridge down a fair amount in seeking the ideal mix.

After a while it becomes frustrating. I love the VP and not complaining about it, just the process of figuring out the best "marriage" with strings.
I've played around a lot with the strings on my VP and to date I'm liking the Fender 7150ML round nickels best followed by Cobalt Flats.

I have an Ampeg SVT VR and 610 Bergantino cab that I have not plugged the VP into yet, but it should be a similar flavor to your Church rig. I'll give it a run tonight to see how the VP with 7150 strings sounds.
 
Hard to like that, you sound a bit down. Easy fix: go get an Alpine white Vintage Pro. Cures all ills.

So now you get a Vintage Pro.. Do it! Come back to the fold!

I put up one of my Squiers for trade either for the Classic Pro IV or the newer Vintage Pro in the locals and see what comes up...