• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

About to do a trade with a guy. My ‘94 Blues Deluxe amp (which is in need of a new speaker) for his Epi IV T-Bird. Pics of it look great. Said he hardly has played it. He was going to get into a band that just happened to fall through. He’s played guitar for 20 years and now has no need for the bass. He also has a Gator hardshell case which is brand new and fits that bass. Going to speak with him on the phone tomorrow. He was asking $350 for the bass and the case. I asked if he would be down with the previously mentioned trade... he said “yes”. Just wondering if anyone out there has one of these basses and your thoughts about the craftsmanship and playability. This bass has received many positive reviews. Just wanted some TBers input. I understand that this bass is a bit prone to neck dive... but I believe I can remedy that by relocating the strap button. Any input would be greatly appreciated

I love mine. Feels good, sounds good, good sustain. And looks cooler than a dozen Fenders.
 
The price is "ok", my best advice is to really try it out, much as I love Thunderbirds, this basic model was difficult for me to get along with - the neck and to a lesser degree the pickups being the issues for me. There are others here that really like these, so my experience may not be typical.
Well, you are kinda spoiled with that harem...
 
Grass skirt and coconut bra have been out for a long time.

th

I trust everyone else hears “Watermelon man” playing!
 
:crying::crying::crying::crying:

I'm so hurt...

Ok, first; PillO, NOT PhillO! I am not a pastry!

Second; some of us used Vi and liked tolerated it because you could do everything you needed on a minimal keyboard without taking hands away from the home row. And this from someone who was a 3 finger typist until the age of 29...

Third; real scientists don't use Mac.

Fourth; tablets are what you get at the drug store, not the computer store.

But go ahead, be like the teenagers and use a gui. And GET OFF MY LAWN!
Such a cute little minion.

1) Your avatar looks like a Twinkie, which is kind of a pastry.

2) I learned to type on an IBM Selectric in the 9th grade. I became quite proficient. Although I'll never forget the day we had a one minute blind (can't look at the keyboard) pop quiz. Teacher flashed a paragraph on the screen and we had one minute to type it. IIRC I completed around 80 words in the minute we were given. Unfortunately I had mistakenly not placed my fingers on the home row keys, which created 79 errors, and resulted in a final score of 1 word a minute on the quiz. Not one of my better moments.

3) My entire career was in Engineering specifically supporting the R&D scientific community. Nearly every lab bench had DOS or windows based PCs where experiment data was gathered and numbers were crunched. And nearly every scientist also had an office, with a Mac that was used to present the data, and perform most other office tasks (email, info searches, blog and scientific community boards, peer reviews...).

4) I'm retired now so a tablet meets 95% of my needs, the rest is done on a Mac desktop or laptop if needed. When I was working it was much closer to the inverse, 90% on the laptop or docking station and 10% on the iPad.

I'll never forget all the grief Mac users got from the DOS users in the late 80's up until about the mid 90's about their goofy little computers with silly pictures instead of DOS commands. Of course when Windows came out for the PC they all thought that was the bees knees.

At one point I had a Mac I was running CAD software on. The software was only compatible with windows not MacOS. So I ran the Mac in PC emulation mode and installed Windows 95 so I could run the CAD program. Basically it was a Mac emulating a PC emulating a Mac. Worked fine, just as fast as any of the PC based CAD units in the office.

Ahh, the good old days.
 
So another BaCH II just popped up nearby on craigslist, of the honeyburst ones with, I believe, the neck volute and a belly cut. A very good price, fair bit less than the Cherry one. Anyone have thoughts on that run of BaCHs? @godofthunder59 I believe you had @Dadagoboi 's one at some point, either of you have a comment?
Yes I still have Cataldos Bach! Definitely a bass worth getting, mine isn't going anywhere. I have three Bachs at the moment and would definitely snap up another. You should grab it!
 
I'm like you. There are times when something sounds great initially. But often when that doesn't happen I do the string rotation thing and other tweeks for tone. As far as comfort goes, I can adjust easily it the sound it right (as in my '76, which is the most uncomfortable and heavy--yet still sounds better than most basses). But I let it ride for a 6 months or a year before concluding this one isn't for me.

I have a '64 Pbass that was great to play, but honky sounding. Had '67 PUs in it and I dropped some '62 Klein's in it and Pyramid flats, and it went from the worst sounding bass to one of the best. I'm so glad I didn't give up on it.
Got that.
On this Ibanez 5er I traded for recently, I'm discovering I'm probably going to change the pup's. After a couple different sets of strings and learning a bit about the preamp, my ears seemed to have honed in on the guts/ pup's. The pre is new-ish, and sounds like it has a pretty able eq. The bass produces a sort of "compressed" tone- as if the sound I want to hear is under something and can't get out. It sounds too controlled. Don't know if that makes any sense, but I'm guessing that it's the pup's. I want it to be a little more "open" sounding...
I'm dealing with it for now, I'm liking some things about the bass, like the close string spacing. On the one hand it doesn't feel as free for my right hand, but on the other, a lot of playability is more accessible to my left.
In the rock n roll context it's not the T'Bird, but it's doing a cool thing that I'm enjoying...
 
Bull sharks can go into fresh water.
Invalid Link Removed
Yeah, but he might not have known that.
My ignorance of the former enabled my ignorance of the latter... :D

L Ontario is a long way from the ocean. If there were a species of shark in the N Atlantic that could survive long enough and navigate far enough, it would run into a significant obstacle in the form of the Iroquois dam (which is the real cause of the flooding in L Ontario).
Iroquois Dam - Wikipedia
 
Isn't there a "Nessie" or "Champ" in Lake Ontario?:nailbiting:
To the best of my knowledge, there is no sea monster in L Ontario although some have tried to develop a story of one. Ontario does have a sea monster legend. It is said that the Mussie lives in Muskrat Lake in NE Ontario.
Muskrat Lake - Wikipedia
Mussie - Wikipedia

How would I know such a piece of local lore? I was part of an expedition to locate and capture the Mussie. We left work at lunch time and spent a full afternoon searching. We found the Mussie, killed it, made burgers from it. Coincidentally, alcohol was involved.