Knowing GP land, you can probably get plenty of flak for saying "a vintage NR II".Yeah, probably not a good idea to reply honestly...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Knowing GP land, you can probably get plenty of flak for saying "a vintage NR II".Yeah, probably not a good idea to reply honestly...
Mine is around 9So I'm thinking of looking for an Epiphone Vintage Pro to compliment my Lull T5, sometimes the 5er gets to be a bit much for some of the more technical Hard Rock songs (or surprisingly, Rock and Roll Hoochie Koo or I Ain't the One).
Looking at Sweetwater, they have one at 11 lbs, and one at 9 lbs 13 oz, is this heavy weight typical? If so, they're not for me. I need 9 lbs or less, especially in a 4 string.
Y'all got me curious. The '67 THUNDERBIRD NR IV is 9.5# according to the bathroom scale.Mine is around 9
Cool! I think you’re right about the neck.Lol ya. I like the pups in my vp and those pups i can not find. There is an Embassy on ebay for $350 and thats about the best price I can find so this for $250 works. Plus I bet that neck can be fixed pretty easy.
Glen, you are just wasting time typing when you could be buying.Vintage Pro, Vintage Pro, VINTAGE PRO!!!! Confound all you enablers!![]()
As good a reason as any. But They seem to turn over pretty quick on SW so I would hope they do the right thing and keep making them.Well, shoot. I guess that means it's time to start looking out for one. I'll probably never own a 1960s reverse, which is my version of the holy grail.
Wait. There were basses....?You've got some kick @$$ rigs behind those basses.
Wow. That was Chucky? For some reason I assumed it was you. Got to stop checking in with my phone.And Thunderbird Club reaches a new low with frog porn...
But what upsets me is that I wasn't involved in the new low.
Wait. There were basses....?
I wouldn’t try it. Capacitors intimidate me.I'm not sure that I have ever seen a 1 transistor fuzz. I'm most familiar with the 2 transistor type.
For bass, I think a clean blend to retain bottom end is critical; for use with your Thunderbird.
But if you want a really good bang, connect an electrolytic capacitor backwards (reversed polarity). As a rule of thumb, physically bigger capacitors produce a bigger bang.
That was you? It occasionally ends up on the sets Spotify chooses for me.View attachment 3554065
....Here’s The Monochrome Set, if anybody remembers “Eine Symphonie des Grauens”.....playing a brand new Rick through my Marshall (the real one).....
my 68 II comes in at 7.86....didn't think that bridge pup and covers would weigh so much..Y'all got me curious. The '67 THUNDERBIRD NR IV is 9.5# according to the bathroom scale.
When you have such a high tolerance, you can taste it. I don't love the flavor of habaneros. Too fruity-tasting.I'm with you. I like spicy but that kind of hot is not a flavor.![]()
...or maybe he's a muse!Watch out there Mike, he's both.
It might also be the graphite reinforcing rods in the HS repair.my 68 II comes in at 7.86....didn't think that bridge pup and covers would weigh so much..
Nah, they're outta England....or maybe he's a muse!