At the risk of saying something unpopular...
When I did a quick search for ACLU news, there was something about a vanity license plate and something about prison inmates right to be protected from corona virus. I would have thought the ACLU would have been advocating some sort of position balancing the public health issue against the freedoms guaranteed by the first ten amendments (even if they don't particularly care to and have never defended #2). But nothing discussing the obvious curtailing of freedoms in the name of public health - note not advocating for or against, but just a discussion.
Shutting down the economy will save a few lives, but will certainly cost some as well. Further, it could push a number of people at the margin into poverty. Increasing poverty is associated with poorer health and shortened lifespan. This itself argues that there is some optimization that allows for a certain death rate from the virus to prevent a lot of other deaths. It is a great ideal that no one should die, but it isn't realistic. Perhaps we need to be searching for the least worst outcome across a large number of metrics and not focusing on one virus.
But what do I know. I'm just some idiot on the internet who does outcome measures and health economics for personal entertainment. But I do play a Thunderbird.