• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

@godofthunder59....Scott's the man.....tight..
upload_2020-7-19_13-41-25.png
 
Thanks for posting that! Good reading. Interestingly enough his take on Chromes was my area of dislike in the past--that scooped nature they exhibit. Everyone's ranking would be different, but a good overall summary.
Chromes on my MIM P are a match made in heaven. I love that bass. Never thought they’d be a match for a bird though. I’m expending my horizons and will try them on a bird.
 
I used the DR Black Beauties today on the 06 Gibson. Might be the string! They came on the bass, but who knew? Overall they sounded better with (miles) pick, fingers, neck pu only or both. I was really liking the neck only, pick or fingers. Going to leave them on and see how it goes. I have a set of DR Dragon Skins with the same K3 coating. They are not black and don't feel the same. Might not be a bad option either. But the black strings are growing on me. Good tone today and a happy camper with that bass. No more while playing thinking, "What can I change or adjust to sound better.":thumbsup:
Told you so! About getting that bird I mean. Your journey has been fun to read about. I so want another Gibson. Here’s the current family flock.

6780F7B5-6911-43CF-B3E6-CA38BD03E817.jpeg
 
Told you so! About getting that bird I mean. Your journey has been fun to read about. I so want another Gibson. Here’s the current family flock.

View attachment 3910874
Yep. I should have just listened to counsel's advice on that! The bass is really fun to play now. It always felt great, but now that the sound is there, it's just fun like it should be! I felt really bad when I was going nowhere and just seemed like I was whining. I was just frustrated because I wanted this bass to sound so good and I wasn't getting there. I'm grateful for the Sonic Maximizer as well. It now sounds great, and sounds different from the other Thunderbirds.

Great pic! I really like the NR and a '15 would be very tempting if one ever came up for sale. I hope nothing good comes up for sale for a long time. I would really need to sell something, like one of the G&Ls or the Malti-poo.
 
Last edited:
We just keep a list of members that I post, so nothing to very official. A posted pic of your Thunderbird is all we ask :)
There's one otherwise fine Canadian fellow that might suggest an initiation ritual involving watermelon helmets - nothing could be further from the truth. :roflmao:

We all know that a watermelon is not required for initiation. But, if you want to have fun...

watermelon_head.gif
 
Thundexperts, do any of you know if the Epi Classic Pro is 7 or 9 ply in reality?
I realize the Epi website is not definitive (which is incredibly ironic), but per wayback.org (which archives the web), Epi claimed the CP was 7 ply mahogany/walnut, and the Pro was 7 ply (maple/walnut). The current Epi site claims the VP is the same as what they said the CP was.
 
funny you mention, Chrome flats is what I had on that TB IV before the makeover. the bass had 70's sidewinders (now safe in a drawer) and the chrome three point....really dug the tone of that bass in that config and with those strings! totally worked from a tone and tension perspective...they're 105's...looking to putting them back on my P...
If you have any intention of letting go of the sidewinders let me know.
 
I realize the Epi website is not definitive (which is incredibly ironic), but per wayback.org (which archives the web), Epi claimed the CP was 7 ply mahogany/walnut, and the Pro was 7 ply (maple/walnut). The current Epi site claims the VP is the same as what they said the CP was.
Yes, Although I've read that they are, in reality, 9 ply.
 

Latest posts