- Jun 30, 2010
- 49,588
- 221,962
- Disclosures
- musician/artist/owner - Gildaxe
What we see is holes in laws as a result of lawmakers' inability to see the future.
In making products that are "bad for you" attractive to minors, I question whether it should be illegal to produce them, although I certainly think it is immoral, because the government can't be the arbiter of morality. I support freedom in all forms including the right of an adult to choose what they put into their body (and the accompanying responsibility for the result of those choices).
But parents need to protect their children. I don't think parents should be outsourcing the raising and protection of their children to the state by expecting laws and regulations to be a broad shield. But having said that, ID laws around purchasing a wide variety of products is a reasonable intervention on the part of the state.
I get all of that - but I see how parents don't protect their children in the same ways that dog owners don't train their dogs. BTW, I consider dogs (vital living beings) the same as children - if someone isn't a responsible person they shouldn't have either. (no governing rule/regulation on that) Unfortunately profit-driven (yes, I agree - immoral) corporations could give a rats ass about being responsible - hence, the necessity of safeguard governmental regulations. I completely understand and agree that there are currently so many broken parts of what could be a workable way of living "in the free world" in our country. (and it will only get worse in todays world)
Last edited:

