• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

** ThunderFunk vs. LittleMark II **

This is the exact question that is spinning around in my mind at the moment. The T-Funk or the LMII. Cabs of choice are Berg HT-112/EX-112. I know both heads are popular with this setup, but I'm still stumped. Portability is always an issue, but by no means is the T-Funk too heavy for my needs. The weight of the Markbass would just be a bonus.

I guess the real question for me is, weight and portability aside... What can one amp do better than the other amp tonewise, if anything?

:help: :help:
 
This is the exact question that is spinning around in my mind at the moment. The T-Funk or the LMII. Cabs of choice are Berg HT-112/EX-112. I know both heads are popular with this setup, but I'm still stumped. Portability is always an issue, but by no means is the T-Funk too heavy for my needs. The weight of the Markbass would just be a bonus.

I guess the real question for me is, weight and portability aside... What can one amp do better than the other amp tonewise, if anything?

:help: :help:

Big +1. Funny, we're exactly in the same position! :hmm:
 
It sounds like both the TF and LM suit a lot of us. Light weight, powerful and have effective tonal options. I dearly love my TF. That said, I am an admitted cheapskate...If I were shopping now, who knows. I have neither heard nor, duh, played the LM. From the reports of those (whose taste I admire, btw) who have, it sounds like one heckuva unit at a very affordable price. The LM sure would be tempting. If it were not for Dave's extremely generous trade in policy, I still would not have experienced the joy that my TF brings me. The TF is the further refinement of a long-proven design, and Dave's accessible if I need him. I feel it will be with me for the rest of my playing days.

It will be interesting to see how the LMs hold up over time.(not a suggestion of any issues...just personal curiosity)

Kim
 
This is the exact question that is spinning around in my mind at the moment. The T-Funk or the LMII. Cabs of choice are Berg HT-112/EX-112. I know both heads are popular with this setup, but I'm still stumped. Portability is always an issue, but by no means is the T-Funk too heavy for my needs. The weight of the Markbass would just be a bonus.

I guess the real question for me is, weight and portability aside... What can one amp do better than the other amp tonewise, if anything?

:help: :help:
Thanks for getting this train back on the tracks.
 
This is the exact question that is spinning around in my mind at the moment. The T-Funk or the LMII. Cabs of choice are Berg HT-112/EX-112. I know both heads are popular with this setup, but I'm still stumped. Portability is always an issue, but by no means is the T-Funk too heavy for my needs. The weight of the Markbass would just be a bonus.

I guess the real question for me is, weight and portability aside... What can one amp do better than the other amp tonewise, if anything?

:help: :help:

They're more alike than different IMO... especially in respect to me not having to work at all to get a usable tone.
 
I guess the real question for me is, weight and portability aside... What can one amp do better than the other amp tonewise, if anything?

:help: :help:

I think that's been partially answered already in terms of what the amps can do: The TF has more EQ versitility since it has a semi-para eq, whereas the LMII has fixed EQ points. Whether you need the semi-para on the TF, or you don't like the EQ centers on the MB is personal preference. They both have tone 'quick-fixes' in the sense that the TF has a 'timbre' knob, and the LMII has the VLE and VPF knobs, but those need to be heard in person to make a usable comparison.

In terms of a practical (read: real world) comparison the amps, quite honestly I don't think we'll get to a satisfactory answer, because (IMO) that would involve bringing both heads to a gig and A/B-ing them with the same cab/bass/room/band, etc. I regret I no longer have the TF to make this happen, but until someone that owns both can do this, I don't think we'll know for sure. Best thing to do is try each out as much as you can and make a judgement call.

FWIW, weight, portability and price aside, I believe both work equally well for my tone needs.
 
I think that's been partially answered already in terms of what the amps can do: The TF has more EQ versitility since it has a semi-para eq, whereas the LMII has fixed EQ points. Whether you need the semi-para on the TF, or you don't like the EQ centers on the MB is personal preference. They both have tone 'quick-fixes' in the sense that the TF has a 'timbre' knob, and the LMII has the VLE and VPF knobs, but those need to be heard in person to make a usable comparison.

In terms of a practical (read: real world) comparison the amps, quite honestly I don't think we'll get to a satisfactory answer, because (IMO) that would involve bringing both heads to a gig and A/B-ing them with the same cab/bass/room/band, etc. I regret I no longer have the TF to make this happen, but until someone that owns both can do this, I don't think we'll know for sure. Best thing to do is try each out as much as you can and make a judgement call.

FWIW, weight, portability and price aside, I believe both work equally well for my tone needs.

I have both and have taken both on the same gigs and done just that. IMO that still won't give anyone a satisfactory answer other than myself;). The best thing to do, as you and I have both said, is to try each for yourself.
 
About thatimbre knob, what exactly does it to? I've heard alot of people like it, but it's only useful within that 11o'clock to 1o'clock region.

I know that the vle knob on my mb is useful through it's full range if you wanna get really thumpy, or at least up to 1 or 2 o'clock, so I'm guessing the timbre isn't jsut a 'passive tone rolloff' type deal.

When I'm playing at school with the jazz abnd, we have a fender bassman 250 combo which has a 'room balance' knob. It adds lows and boom while cutting highs when turned counter clockwise, turned clockwise it adds alot of high mids and highs while cutting alot of bottom and low mids. My guess is that this is kind of what the timbre does.

If this is true, I would guess that the timbree circuit is cutting and boosting at much different frequencies. That room balance knob sound either way too harsh or way too boomy, not a musical control at all. Given I'm playing an upright in this situation, not sure how much of an effect that makes.

So, what's the lowdown on the timbre knob?
 
About thatimbre knob, what exactly does it to? I've heard alot of people like it, but it's only useful within that 11o'clock to 1o'clock region.

I know that the vle knob on my mb is useful through it's full range if you wanna get really thumpy, or at least up to 1 or 2 o'clock, so I'm guessing the timbre isn't jsut a 'passive tone rolloff' type deal.

When I'm playing at school with the jazz abnd, we have a fender bassman 250 combo which has a 'room balance' knob. It adds lows and boom while cutting highs when turned counter clockwise, turned clockwise it adds alot of high mids and highs while cutting alot of bottom and low mids. My guess is that this is kind of what the timbre does.

If this is true, I would guess that the timbree circuit is cutting and boosting at much different frequencies. That room balance knob sound either way too harsh or way too boomy, not a musical control at all. Given I'm playing an upright in this situation, not sure how much of an effect that makes.

So, what's the lowdown on the timbre knob?

The timbre knob is a very cool, very fast way to adjust your overall tone. Bassier to brighter. Like a passive tone control with balls. Sounds like it may be a lot more usuable than the Fender one you used. I found that small adjustments were all that was ever needed.
 
About thatimbre knob, what exactly does it to? I've heard alot of people like it, but it's only useful within that 11o'clock to 1o'clock region.

I know that the vle knob on my mb is useful through it's full range if you wanna get really thumpy, or at least up to 1 or 2 o'clock, so I'm guessing the timbre isn't jsut a 'passive tone rolloff' type deal.

When I'm playing at school with the jazz abnd, we have a fender bassman 250 combo which has a 'room balance' knob. It adds lows and boom while cutting highs when turned counter clockwise, turned clockwise it adds alot of high mids and highs while cutting alot of bottom and low mids. My guess is that this is kind of what the timbre does.

If this is true, I would guess that the timbree circuit is cutting and boosting at much different frequencies. That room balance knob sound either way too harsh or way too boomy, not a musical control at all. Given I'm playing an upright in this situation, not sure how much of an effect that makes.

So, what's the lowdown on the timbre knob?

The VLE knob is simply a treble roll-off control similar to a classic passive tone control on a Fender bass. Very nice, although somewhat redundant if you have a passive tone control on your bass.

The Timbre control on the Thunderfunk, as Brad correctly points out, is an overall revoicing of the preamp, to the bass side counterclockwise, and to the treble side clock wise. It's very different from the enhance control (which the TF and MB both have, although its named differently).

The Timbre control basically moves the entire voicing of the amp up and down. I am one who finds it quite useful with certain cabs, but to be honest, I run my TF pretty much dead flat almost all the time with almost all the cabs I own. However, if you have a very dark or very bright sounding cab, the Timbre can be used to kind of 'center' the amps tone prior to adjusting the EQ.

The Fender circuit you describe sounds quite similar, as is the Walter Woods 'balance' control.

It is a very powerful tone control, but I am one who can't even imagine using it at the 11 o'clock or 1 o'clock level.. too extreme for me. However, just a tiny smidge either clockwise or counterclockwise can have a useful effect in some rooms, with some cabs, and with some basses.

The combination of the TF enhance, switch, and timbre is quite powerful. However, like most amps... it has an inherent tone that you either like or don't. I find that if you end up needing to do lot's of EQing with an amp to get your sound, you are probably better off trying another amp.

With me... I would be very happy if the TF just had a volume control and the enhance control (and I could actually do without the enhance, since at most, it's set at 9 o'clock, and only with my most mid voiced cabs)... that's about all I really use, since the inherent voicing of the head is right where the 'tone in my head' sits, at least with J bass type instruments.

I'm looking forward to checking out the LMII when it arrives tomorrow.

K
 
Does it simultaneously cut and boost, or just cut highs counter clockwise, and boost highs clockwise?

It really doesn't work that way. Think of it more as moving all the center points of all the EQ controls up or down. It's hard to describe. Turning it to the left makes your cab behave like a 2x15 cab with no tweeter. Turning it to the right makes your cab behave like a tight 410 with the tweeter turned up... not exactly, but hopefully that makes sense... it's an overall shifting of the amps voice.
 
I think I got it now, thanks Ken. Makes much more sense.

Cool! So, if I've pieced the info together from a couple different threads that we've been posting on, you will be running two NL-210's (8ohm) with the Markbass 800 head?

That should be pretty awesome. I will have my LMII tomorrow, and will give it a tryout with my 4ohm NL-210 and drop you a PM on what the basic sound is like compared to the Thunderfunk and iAmp500, for context.

K
 
Rather than being argumentative, I'm really trying to add something by saying this.

IME, that cliche of a 2x15 or a 4x10 doesn't match what the Timbre knob did for me. I play a lot of 2x15 and they don't sound nearly as dark/muffled as the TF gets by only moving the Timbre two points to the left. A Mesa 4x10 (not sure the model) I use occasionally has masses more bottom than most 2x15 (sealed) cabs I've used. I know people have a preception of what a given cab config will sound like, but my reality seldom matches that perception. Not even on average.

I think the description of Fender's room control matches what the Timbre effectively does pretty well. And yes, even a move of 2 points is pretty extreme on the Timbre. I only ever found use for it between roughly -1 and +1. One reason I have a much better time with the MB's filters.

Of course, my example was not perfect, but the logic is correct... from darker, fatter, bigger.... to tighter, punchier and 'upper middier'.... within the IMO usable range of 11 o'clock to 1 o'clock. +1 to '2 points' either way though.. I can't imagine!

I don't get the comparison to the MB filter though.... the 'enhance' controls are similar for both amps, and the VLE is something totally different from the Timbre... it performs a totally different function, which is very useful, it seems, if you don't have a passive tone control on your bass, and rather redundant, looking at the published frequency curve on the site, if you do.
 
I have to say, that while the vle is definitely a somewhat redundant control of you hae a passive tone control on your bass.....it has worked wonders with my Sadowsky. If I find myself having to use backlines anytime soon, or needing to record direct, I'll definitely be adding a vtc to the sadowsky.

It's also helpful on my rob allen, since the tone control on that bass is accessed on the back and required a small flathead screwdriver.
 
I have to say, that while the vle is definitely a somewhat redundant control of you hae a passive tone control on your bass.....it has worked wonders with my Sadowsky. If I find myself having to use backlines anytime soon, or needing to record direct, I'll definitely be adding a vtc to the sadowsky.

It's also helpful on my rob allen, since the tone control on that bass is accessed on the back and required a small flathead screwdriver.

+1 in a HUGE way, and you are kind of making my point.... a passive tone control (whether it's on your bass or innovatively.. is that a word:D .... with the Markbass amps actually having it on the head) does wonders for a brightly voiced instrument like the Sadowsky J's or with piezo pickups with that 'over the top' sizzle.

It's probably the only tone control I actually use on a gig after I get the rig dialed in for the room (which usually is just moving the TF enhance and or bass control a tiny amount:D :bassist: ).

Good stuff!!!!

K