I have several basses. They all are made with wood. They all have good tone.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Likewise placebo can and does work to reinforce the existing viewpoint of believers of a certain issue, such as tonewoods; it's not just a one way street. In the recent thread there were a couple of videos that showed it wasn't consistent or important to 'good tone' and I have others as well. I can also show how various biases and belief systems will affect a persons position, as well as how flawed many of the testing methodologies are as I've done sensory testing in other fields and have a fair bit of experience in the subject.Placebo is a real thing and can help you in your eternal search for meaning and happiness in life
The use of the term 'denier' is a pejorative derived from those who don't ascribe to the historical reality of the Holocaust around WW2.
I’ve never really dove into the flat earthers theories, & arguments for a flat earth, sounds like you are quite knowledgeable in that realm tho.Like a self referential echo chamber such as found in flat earth and cryptozoological groups?
I'm happy to believe that, yet I've seen little evidence that it's so. It's come to much more prominent use in recent years for those who speak against the general narrative on certain in and as a way to devalue that person and their opinion. It's well beyond the scope of this board and it's rules to discuss the history of this and why, but I can and have in other appropriate fora before. This subject I know well and a certain recent legal decision and the history behind it backs it up.I’m pretty sure that word was in use before WW2.
I'm not sure if you're intending to be insulting, but I'll give the benefit of the doubt.I’ve never really dove into the flat earthers theories, & arguments for a flat earth, sounds like you are quite knowledgeable in that realm tho.
I'm happy to believe that, yet I've seen little evidence that it's so. It's come to much more prominent use in recent years for those who speak against the general narrative on certain in and as a way to devalue that person and their opinion. It's well beyond the scope of this board and it's rules to discuss the history of this and why, but I can and have in other appropriate fora before. This subject I know well and a certain recent legal decision and the history behind it backs it up.
Fine. I'm going to clarify that I'm referring to it's increased use as an insult, especially in recent years, and as a put down as I explained in the post following the one you just quoted.A simple search finds several dictionary articles saying it’s from 1600’s French: probably Latin
before that. It’s an old word who’s meaning hasn’t changed much. As a compound word with various other words, it’s use may have increased somewhat lately, but by itself, it’s pretty mature.
Exactly, in the general context of the word, it’s a rather harmless word that can be assigned to pretty much any debatable subject matter, material, philosophy, ideology & so forth. Edit: simply put, it just means to deny something. What that “something “ is, obviously can run across a huge spectrum of things.. It’s an old word who’s meaning hasn’t changed much
Okay but what if you don't believe in tonewoods, but you're pretty sure Nessie is chilling just out of the sonars range?Let's say you were in a group that believed the Loch Ness Monster were a real creature. If you explicitly disallowed anyone who presented any opposite evidence, such as the extensive sonar testing done in the Loch, and only allowed evidence to be included that reinforced what the members believed, there would be little benefit to it except as a social club. That's what I meant.
Play a instrument made out of poplar and you will realize tonewoods are real (and poplar isn't one of them)
Thanks to all who participated in the discussion, im going to “self moderate” and quietly leave the discussion, before contentious things start to arise, as they inevitably do..
And while I had some lighthearted fun, it’s so easy to get drawn into divisive arguments on these forums.
This one hasn’t quite made it there yet, but it’s bent in that direction… We are all bass players, and while it’s ok to disagree, and attempt to have positive discussions on things we disagree on, after reflecting on this thread, I think im going try to stick to the stuff that we all really have in common, that unites us & not divides, the love of all things bass, peace& love y’all.
It kinda sounds like you are a believer in tonewood, but not one who believes that it’s quantifiable or absolutely deterministic. IMHO, one can only generalize about the tonal characteristics of a given type of wood, much like one can only generalize about the personality inherent in a given type of dog or cat. There’s way too much variation to nail it down.I've planted my flag on the hill of 'I don't believe it makes anywhere near the difference the tonewood beliers say it does, nor is it consistent amongst specific species or even necessarily amongst pieces from the same tree' viewpoint. However, in light of verifiable and repeatable evidence, I will change my mind, and have on many issues over the years. I've yet to actually see any such evidence presented. And anecdote does not constitute evidence.