Just generic China I take it? Was peavey using the same source back then? $11 for a whole set brand new has me wondering if they might be a serious downgrade or not. I would want it to stay in tuneHow's $11??
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Just generic China I take it? Was peavey using the same source back then? $11 for a whole set brand new has me wondering if they might be a serious downgrade or not. I would want it to stay in tuneHow's $11??
What do you consider the later ones that have the mim fender style no cover truss rod holes? Is the neck a different profile? The bridge and tuners appear to be the same on both versions. Now I'm really bummed I couldn't snag the pinstripe with case for $125. But if the pickup is at least decent enough to not scream "upgrade me", I'm good, I like grindy, but not at the expense of low end. The seller near me with the bass missing the truss rod cover says his is 1992, the one I pictured above is claimed 1993, but it is a bid sale so it may be out of the question.This is the last generation fury with the lower grade hardware and single piece D neck. As far as the electronics, I don't know about CTS pots but I believe it is the 5 wire pup, I don't think that changed. The electronics on mine are solid and quiet. Some say the pup is not as hot but mine is hotter than any Fender I've owned. Grinds like a mofo. The only thing I'd watch out for on these is the neck, can be not as stable as the earlier 2 piece and some have noted the ski bump...but with the microtilt I believe you can get things squared away with a decent setup unless the neck is totally twisted....which I have never seen.
Do you mean it is the type with one wire from each coil, and a short jumper wire between the 2 in series? Would those wires happen to be very thin and red and blue? Or is it with the fatter white and black 4 wire arrangement? (I thought I saw a pic of a 4 wire here but it might have been a different thread entirely because I went back a few pages and didn't see it.)Had another look. Pots are marked SH A250K & SH B250K.
The 4 wires I saw when tilting PG to the side was wrong,I mistaken a loop for 2 wires.
Starting to think about maybe thinning the herd a bit more and selling these.......
Just took PG back off but I remembered camera this time.
View attachment 1034555 View attachment 1034556 View attachment 1034557 View attachment 1034560
I prefer the slimmer neck, I don't remember mine being 2pc, but it was over 20 yrs ago. I rather have the board anyway, as long as it is maple.@ubernator I thought those were the same necks based on the hardware but could be wrong. The earlier neck is two piece with no board....you can look at the side of the neck to see if there is a board seam or look directly on the top and you can see the two piece seam down the middle if it is the older one. The older one is more C shaped and the newer one much slimmer an D shaped.
This was the era when Peavey was making a lot of changes on the fly, especially with hardware so there are some variations year to year.
Thanks again for your reply, It only made me want a Forum more, and my bargain Forum boat just sailed into port.View attachment 1015503
Mine are not for sale. I always considered these working/poor man's modulus, but with a wood neck. The g bass had a graphite neck making it much closer to the mod. They are def in the active mm and mod tone camp. SUPER HOT pups in these bad boys! I highly recommend one if you can find it.
DON"T DO IT!!!!!
There, how was that?
Nice score! These basses kill everywhere except your wallet!Thanks again for your reply, It only made me want a Forum more, and my bargain Forum boat just sailed into port.
Invalid Link Removed YEEHAW! $149