• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

U.S. Peavey Club

01111_5mix4f5AmqB_1200x900.jpg
IMG_1902.jpg

I got him to take a pic, but he had put it back together already when I asked for 2 closer pics of the pots and pickup respectively.

This looks different than what I saw posted before, but it is 5 wires and the green and white are soldered together at the other end.

These are the best fury split pickups? Or is there also an aftermarket 5 wire? I remember seeing something different before....
 
Anyone here with both a pinstripe with 5 wire and a 92-93 with 3 wire (thick black and white wires) compare the output level and overall response. Are they good for backing each other up without requiring more than a small tweak of either the gain or the low knob when changing between the 2?

And has anyone added an s1 type switch to a 5 wire to add series parallel switching via a push pull? Worth doing that to a fury?
 
@ubernator .....That's the 5 wire. This is in a 1989. Gray jacketed cable with 4 conductors and shield. Personally I wouldn't do parallel.
View attachment 1078105
Cool. I'm actually waiting at starbucks right now to meet the seller, it was 40+ miles away so I called while on the way. He/she didn't answer... Said we could meet as early as 6, but now isn't answering the phone...

Fingers crossed I did not get Craigslist flaked into wasting $15 in gas and an overpriced Starbucks "breakfast". Plan was to get back home and go to sleep...

Edit: he is on the way... Heeeeere we go.

This will plug the gas leak for now, and I am pretty sure the milestone will be on the block shortly if so.
 
Last edited:
Anyone here with both a pinstripe with 5 wire and a 92-93 with 3 wire (thick black and white wires) compare the output level and overall response. Are they good for backing each other up without requiring more than a small tweak of either the gain or the low knob when changing between the 2?

And has anyone added an s1 type switch to a 5 wire to add series parallel switching via a push pull? Worth doing that to a fury?
I have an '88 Fury and the output measured 14.36ohm,I also have a '96 and the measurement was 7.91ohm.Comparing the two you definitely notice a difference in output and would have to dial back the '96 if switching.
IMG_1978.JPG
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark Andrew
I have an '88 Fury and the output measured 14.36ohm,I also have a '96 and the measurement was 7.91ohm.Comparing the two you definitely notice a difference in output and would have to dial back the '96 if switching. View attachment 1078313
I don't have a meter, but I have been tweaking back and forth with the new 91 and the 93. So yep, I got the bass, and I'm pretty sure it is the same one I missed at $125 with the case, and suspected was relisted for $300. Seller admitted to recently picking it up, and changing out the speed knobs for strat knobs, and keeping the case. He did well, got a few extra bucks ( $140 from me), and kept the case, strap and metronome that was pictured in the original ad for the first pinstripe I missed. So it is finally mine.

About that 96, is it the type with the bar magnet on the bottom, and the thin red and blue wires, or is it with magnetic pole pieces and the fatter black and white wires? I would think the post 94 was when they started with the cheaper import pickup. Or perhaps what I am assuming is USA in my 93 is just a higher quality import pickup?

The 91 5 wire is both noticeably quieter and less bassy than the 93 3 wire. I had added cotton to raise the 93 pickup to bring it up to the level of my vfl foundation which is quite hot, and it may have even exceeded it by a tad. I removed the cotton to put it back to "stock" max height (foam only) which is lower than I am running the 5 wire which is on springs. This was after realizing that the seller might have put the pickup back in backwards when he took one coil out for that picture, it sounded OK through his TC helicon voicelive plugged into his car stereo, but who knows what eq curve he dialed in while I was moving my car to the same lot he was in. When I got it home in headphones it seemed really honky in the mids and totally anemic in the lows, and a Yuuuge difference compared to the 93. I looked at his picture again and flipped the pickup so the colored leads were both coming from the inside ends of the coil, for maximum slack, which made sense to me. He put it in backwards so it was out of phase, DOH! Still when in phase, it was not as hot as the 93, so that's when I took the added cotton out of the 93 to lower the pickups a bit. They are closer to each other now, but there is no way I could plug and play these 2 as backups for each other without tweaking the gain and or bass on the amp.

The 5 wire does seem to have a bit more presence in the mids like a vintage p bass, where the 93 is a bit punchier. The 91 seems a tad heavier too, so perhaps the body is not resonating as much as the lighter 93 with a worn out/soft finish.

Buzzing starts around 11th fret, and the relief looks decent, maybe needs a tad more loosened once I get the proper wrench. I was hoping there was a little tilt I could remove, but the heel was flush. Maybe I will give the saddles a slight tweak in the meantime. Both of these Furies have lower action than I usually use, lower than my foundation, milestone II and my USA fenders (my geddy has low-ish action too).

As always, I won't really get to the test shootout until the next time I get to plug them into an amp rather than headphones, at real volume that I can't do here. Unfortunately the band I was using my fury and foundation in just had its plug pulled, and the only band I am playing bass in is in drop C and I dedicate my epi birds to that one.

I need to be more proactive in my search. I have been distracted by things like this fury, and trying to play guitar with my singers original band.

There was a scare when I got the fury home, I forgot to do my neck knock check for busted/loose truss rod, and was relived that it seemed fine (can hear some ringing a bit but no buzz or rattle in the neck), but I noticed something knocking inside the bass, so I took it apart, and found the broken off tip of a cable in there. Yes it is also possible that it was I who put the pickup in wrong at that time, since it did sound full when demoing it, and this guy seemed smart and careful enough to make sure it went back the same, and I was a little overtired when searching for that rattle.

So then I ended up having to make an adjustment to the input spring, since it was gripping way to hard. An easy fix, just carefully bend it back a bit.

Overall I am pretty stoked, a bit bummed that the pickups are different output and tone spectrum, but that is not always a bad thing, variety is good and having to do a slight gain tweak and maybe a lows tweak isnt a big deal. I'm just ocd about backups, and need to get over that, can't have 2 of everything.

Oh yeah, milestone II is going bye bye. 3 USA peaveys is enough for now, and the import is now the odd man out. I'm going to put the original pickup back in it and save the QP and cts circuit for my fretless project.
 
I didn't take any pics, my lighting and camera sucks, so I'm using the ad pics. There are some chips and scuffs that are not visible in the pics, but overall pretty Clean for 26 yrs old.

So how do they put the truss rods in these 2 piece necks with no fretboard or skunk stripe? Do they bore a hole, or somehow add it when the 2 pieces are glued together? (Boreing a hole makes more sense knowing how neck wood is glued before shaping generally)

1991 pinstripe/script/pointy logo, 5 wire fury.

01111_5mix4f5AmqB_1200x900.jpg
00A0A_lzmLg6Vc6t1_1200x900.jpg
00Q0Q_b6yq2G3rFmL_1200x900.jpg
00m0m_34bjgU3jmJP_1200x900.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: gfaulkner
Nice looking Fury. As far as I know the USA Fury's all use a USA made pickup.
Folks here have mentioned the post 94-95 furies had changed to cheap mini pots and Korean squier grade pickups. Unfortunately I never disassembled the one i had back in the 90s, but I don't remember being blown away by the pickup being any better than my squier II's Korean pickup or the "emg select" I had upgraded it (sqII) to ($29 special).

Peavey really cut corners around 95, the build quality and tuners on my post 95 foundation is not on par with my earlier 90s Furies, but using VFL pickups at least the electronics are good (but not as good as the 91 fury which has cleanable (from the back) pots similar to fender, and an Orange drop as well as a bleed resistor. The pots and green capacitor are about the same on my foundation as they are on the 93 fury. But foundations cost a bit more than Furies, correct? The fury was the entry level until the milestone came out. Later furies (I heard, from this thread) went to pretty much the same electronics as the Korean milestones.

I could totally have remembered that wrong though..

When a bass only costs $2-250, eventually corners get cut to meet up with inflation. Fury was definitely the bottom of the pile for USA peaveys, especially post 95. Nothing about this pinstripe 91 seems bottom of the pile to me though, except the $140 pricetag. The tuners are top notch, but the strap button is not centered on the horn. It isn't exactly the same attention to detail that a $600 USA fender had at that time, things can slip through the cracks on $250 USA peaveys, but overall they were the best bang for the buck.

Hopefully someone chimes in with a definitive answer about the pickups/electronics in the later less desirable USA furies, and how to identify them.

As well as others who have compared the 92-94 transition style 3 wire (thick white/black wire) to the 5 wire for output and low end content, to see if what I am experiencing is common.
 
So how do they put the truss rods in these 2 piece necks with no fretboard or skunk stripe? Do they bore a hole, or somehow add it when the 2 pieces are glued together? (Boreing a hole makes more sense knowing how neck wood is glued before shaping generally)
1991 pinstripe/script/pointy logo, 5 wire fury.

Great score! The truss rod slot was routed in the neck halves and the truss rod installed at glue up. Then the carving on the gunstock machine. All USA Peavey necks were made that way as best I can tell, even neck throughs. To easy and makes too much sense.
 
Great score! The truss rod slot was routed in the neck halves and the truss rod installed at glue up. Then the carving on the gunstock machine. All USA Peavey necks were made that way as best I can tell, even neck throughs. To easy and makes too much sense.

The 2 piece slab design is very stable for such a thin neck. If anything I need to loosen the truss a tad on both of them. Of course I have to get the wrench first.

I can't say the same for the one piece neck with rosewood fretboard on my late 90s foundation. I do like the satin finish though, but the gloss on the older Furies does not bother me, I'm gonna make these 2 Furies my rock/punk p basses, I already gigged the 93 and the foundation, but can't wait for a chance to bust out the pinstripe!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mech
My Foundation 5 is right at 10 lbs.
Maybe that is about right for maple in the thinner peavey body, less wood than a p bass or jazz bass.

Mine might be about the same, it just seems heavier because it is so dense.

I don't know if I have any good flame, what I can see is the same speckling, calico pattern that is frequently visible on maple necks cut a certain way. And the color is dead ringer too. It is very bright acoustically, brighter than my alder p bass with rosewood board, acoustic wise. And much brighter than the rosewood /alder i presume milestone II, anyone know what the post 94 Korean ones were made of? Certainly not maple!
 
Folks here have mentioned the post 94-95 furies had changed to cheap mini pots and Korean squier grade pickups. Unfortunately I never disassembled the one i had back in the 90s, but I don't remember being blown away by the pickup being any better than my squier II's Korean pickup or the "emg select" I had upgraded it (sqII) to ($29 special).

Peavey really cut corners around 95, the build quality and tuners on my post 95 foundation is not on par with my earlier 90s Furies, but using VFL pickups at least the electronics are good (but not as good as the 91 fury which has cleanable (from the back) pots similar to fender, and an Orange drop as well as a bleed resistor. The pots and green capacitor are about the same on my foundation as they are on the 93 fury. But foundations cost a bit more than Furies, correct? The fury was the entry level until the milestone came out. Later furies (I heard, from this thread) went to pretty much the same electronics as the Korean milestones.

I could totally have remembered that wrong though..

When a bass only costs $2-250, eventually corners get cut to meet up with inflation. Fury was definitely the bottom of the pile for USA peaveys, especially post 95. Nothing about this pinstripe 91 seems bottom of the pile to me though, except the $140 pricetag. The tuners are top notch, but the strap button is not centered on the horn. It isn't exactly the same attention to detail that a $600 USA fender had at that time, things can slip through the cracks on $250 USA peaveys, but overall they were the best bang for the buck.

Hopefully someone chimes in with a definitive answer about the pickups/electronics in the later less desirable USA furies, and how to identify them.

As well as others who have compared the 92-94 transition style 3 wire (thick white/black wire) to the 5 wire for output and low end content, to see if what I am experiencing is common.

There are clear differences in hardware...bridge, tuning machines, pickguard quality and of course the neck design and other subtleties as Peavey began to come to the end of USA manufacturing. These are easily documented and clearly cost cutting measures, we all agree on that. The pickups and pots require a bit of effort to document and although there are differences (lower impedence = fewer turns of copper), the idea that they are made in Asia is only speculation and I stand by my comments until someone can demonstrate it to be true.
 
94fury.JPG
$_3-13.JPG

These are 2 different basses, the top one was stated as 1994 on its listing (it sold a while back) and the bottom one is currently being listed as 1980s, I would say it is overpriced at $200, however it includes a beefy fender flight case, so it might be one to grab for someone needing a flight case.

It also dates to 1994. Same year, the difference? The top one that sold has the same tuners that are on my 93, the big plate, big key 70s fender type (but non reverse), and the bottom one has the same smaller back tuners that are on the later 90s ones like my foundation and many furies I have been looking at. Wish I knew the true scoop on the pickups, the moral is, peavey had periods where things were in constant change, so it is possible the electronics are also different.

These 2 also have the headstock shape that was most familiar to me. The peavey predator was the other option to the squier, another friend had the predator and I the squier II, and the fury which ended up being mine after another friend bought it, looked just like these, and 1994 was the year. Man I wish I never sold it. Now I have 2 earlier ones, but something tells me eventually I will get another 94. I like the headstock shape, apparently it was only used for a short time before the switch to that late 90s shape which is very similar.

I don't plan on buying another one piece neck peavey unless it is another practical giveaway. The 2 piece with truss rod cover is much better. So now I am really kicking myself because what I had was a version that was another transition, the last of the 2 piece necks I think, however with peavey you never know, perhaps there are a few 2 PC necks out there with that later headstock shape, but I'm pretty sure that change occurred with the one piece change (no truss cover, 4mm hex)
 
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Is this an early USA grind? Price looks pretty good. I heard something about the USA grinds being painted like this one.

I'm tapped out from that last fury, and not into that kind of bass right now, but figured I would share this, and hopefully get some info.
 
My Foundation is what I would consider a transition bass. It has SF pickups and a 1 piece neck with truss rod cover and later hardware. I can't remember the date...need to check it.

I have two one piece neck with board Peaveys and both are fine necks, super thin and fast and probably I enjoy playing those basses the most of any I own. I do believe they are not as stable as the 2 piece necks but still very good.

Peavey cheapened everything to save cost but still managed to put out quality basses right to the end of USA manufacturing. Most used bad examples have been abused so I always look for excellent condition basses and have not been disappointed yet. I would pay up to 200 for even a later Fury....dependent on condition and if original case was present but I agree that is on the very top end of the price range and if you are patient you can get even good example for much less.

aside...played my 94 Fury on the weekend and sounded fantastic Was standing next to a QSC sub which made it an even better experience. Dimed volume and 30% tone direct through the sound board. Yummy.

Also played at a different venue with my 1st gen Fury and my Foundation, each in a separate set. The sound was horrible...but not due to my basses because I know how they CAN sound. They had no wedges just in-ears and sub was about 30 feet away from me. Bass in the in-ears was horribly distorted. But I suffered through it.
 
@Runnerman When did peavey stop making 2 piece necks?

So apparently there are 1 PC necks with the truss rod cover, are they Les Paul style or just a covered hex nut?

Is your 94 1pc or 2pc? I was assuming all the ones with covers were 2 PC.

Were older rosewood board basses 1 PC?

I have vague memory of my youth fury (late 93/94 most likely) having that glue joint down the middle of the neck. I still want one for the headstock shape/nostalgia. I have a pinstripe, a 93 (not sure what to call that one, softly rounded), and the late 90s shape on the foundation. I just need (want) the same shape as the one I originally had.
 
@Runnerman When did peavey stop making 2 piece necks?

So apparently there are 1 PC necks with the truss rod cover, are they Les Paul style or just a covered hex nut?

Is your 94 1pc or 2pc? I was assuming all the ones with covers were 2 PC.

Were older rosewood board basses 1 PC?

I have vague memory of my youth fury (late 93/94 most likely) having that glue joint down the middle of the neck. I still want one for the headstock shape/nostalgia. I have a pinstripe, a 93 (not sure what to call that one, softly rounded), and the late 90s shape on the foundation. I just need (want) the same shape as the one I originally had.

Let me double check the dates on both the Fury and Foundation.
The Fury does not have a cover but the Foundation does. Both have the single piece neck with board, both maple boards but I think the headstocks are slightly different shapes. Similar hardware otherwise except the string tree is black on the Foundation.