@Chuck M
Both Music Man and Gary Levinson were use the truss wheel adjustment 86/87.
Peavey was late to the party
Thanks. I figured someone here would know.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
@Chuck M
Both Music Man and Gary Levinson were use the truss wheel adjustment 86/87.
Peavey was late to the party
And.... The GV has two Cirrus pickups. The closest pickup to the one in the G bass is the one in the Forum, if I recall.
View attachment 3197305 View attachment 3197306 Made a local deal for a TL6 and Sarzo sig model today. Should have them this evening.
I owned the Sarzo for a few minutes earlier this month. Glad she’s coming home with a friend.
Yes. I had a one PU forum and it had a PU that looked the same as the one in the G bass. The Forum had the same preamp as the Axcelerator where the G bass has the same pre as the Cirrus.
Many players prefer a single pickup bass, especially when that pickup is in the EBMM Stingray position. I like both single and double pickup equipped basses, but my number 1 is a Stingray.Why did Peavey decide to make the G bass with a single PU. Weird. The Cirrus preamp is there...all the bass needs is that second PU and it would be more useful IMO.
I think the G bass pickup position is closer to the P Bass spot.Many players prefer a single pickup bass, especially when that pickup is in the EBMM Stingray position. I like both single and double pickup equipped basses, but my number 1 is a Stingray.
All this talk about the necks on the Millennium basses makes me want to make an observation. I had a Millennium 5 pass through my collection and the bass played and sounded great but felt.....different? Strange? Can't explain it. I traded it to one of the guys here for his Cirrus 5 which I love and he loves the Millennium but kind of misses the Cirrus.
That said, m Millennium 4 feels great. It has a wonderful neck and I compared it to my G Bass (also feels great) and think the Millennium is just as good. I prefer the tone(s) of the dual PU Millennium over the single PU G bass.
I wonder. Why did Peavey decide to make the G bass with a single PU. Weird. The Cirrus preamp is there...all the bass needs is that second PU and it would be more useful IMO.
All this talk about the necks on the Millennium basses makes me want to make an observation. I had a Millennium 5 pass through my collection and the bass played and sounded great but felt.....different? Strange? Can't explain it. I traded it to one of the guys here for his Cirrus 5 which I love and he loves the Millennium but kind of misses the Cirrus.
That said, m Millennium 4 feels great. It has a wonderful neck and I compared it to my G Bass (also feels great) and think the Millennium is just as good. I prefer the tone(s) of the dual PU Millennium over the single PU G bass.
I wonder. Why did Peavey decide to make the G bass with a single PU. Weird. The Cirrus preamp is there...all the bass needs is that second PU and it would be more useful IMO.
Really pretty Millennium Plus 4 on Reverb but it is priced high. The one I just got was new in the case but missing the hang tag and I paid much less than they are asking for this one. They are calling the top tiger eye but it looks like flame maple to me. Lovely flame. Humm...is it called tiger eye because of the color?
Peavey Millennium 4 Plus Tiger Eye | Link's Music
I agree Chuck. It is a real beauty but EVERYTHING on Reverb.com is way overpriced. I mean full on sticker price MSRP prices.