Look at the distance from the g tuner to the right side of the headstock, it's a different shape.I think my white '92 is the same as the '93 in your post here.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Look at the distance from the g tuner to the right side of the headstock, it's a different shape.I think my white '92 is the same as the '93 in your post here.
What’s there ever a USA grind with soap bars ?
I took a 82 (1.75" wide nut) T45 neck and attached it to a 87 Foundation body. It was like they were made for each other--perfect fit, really easy to set up and plays perfectly. I'm pretty sure this could also be done with a T45/T20/1st Gen Fury neck on a 2nd (maybe 3rd) Gen 80s Fury body. I know Bleeker had some issues with replacing necks on his B90, but maybe something was different by that time in Peavey's designs.Thanks for the info. I actually prefer the wider neck on my T20 to the Foundation. But both are great basses.
You might say I'm a fan.For the Peavey fans out there, will you list your opinion of the Peavey bass models throughout their years of production, from the most desirable model to the least desirable model.
WHAAAT ??? I knew you were a Peavey Fan, Blair, but WOW !!!!!!!!!You might say I'm a fan.
There's 51 of my Peavey basses in this photo, couldn't fit the rest in the room.
View attachment 4064003
When you say Most/Least desired . Is that personally or for somebody planning a collection ?
HAHA !!! I agree pretty much with everything you said. Actually, I can't think of anything I disagree with, but you and I are on the same Peavey page. Which, I think is not just opinion but FACT !Most desireable for me are earlier generation USA Fury/Foundations/Patriots/Dynas up until about 1990 before the pared down body shape. Basically anything with the early body shape and Super Ferrite pickups with passive mode available. I would also include the Furys with that same early body shape and split P pickups.
Next would be USA Millenium/Cirrus and the various incarnations - finishes and string counts.
Then 90s USA made basses of any type. All of the above plus Forums, Axcellerators, RJ's, G's and others.
T Series I have never owned so I can't speak to them.
I agree with this statement, too.That's very subjective. You'll get a variety of responses. For me, it's USA Cirrus, Dyna Bass Unity and Millennium. Really can't go wrong with any US made Peavey. Cirrus is the king, for me. Most of the imports are pretty nice too.
Thanks for clearing that up for me.I am more interested in the personal.
I have 6 actual Peaveys and one T45 Tribute made from a 83 Ibanez RB630. Many have mods to make them even better for my needs.For the Peavey fans out there, will you list your opinion of the Peavey bass models throughout their years of production, from the most desirable model to the least desirable model. Please include basses from all countries of manufacture, without regard to current price or market value. I won't offer my opinion since I don't want to skew the results.
Thanks in advance,
Thump on,
One_Dude
My favorites:
Generation 1 (Slant Super Ferrite) Fury
Generation 2 (Split P) Fury
Patriot
I have 6 actual Peaveys and one T45 Tribute made from a 83 Ibanez RB630. Many have mods to make them even better for my needs.
View attachment 4064433
The T45/Foundation hybrid is shown in an earlier incarnation with a SF and Toaster. It's final dual Toaster form is seen above in post #19224.
Below is my 91 Dyna 5. This was an ebay score of dirt cheap proportion. It required a LOT of work to get up and running, but well worth it.
View attachment 4064434
I think the T series were a solid introduction to the Peavey way: make something that riffs on the big names, but offers more flexibility and value. These were really cool basses for the late 70s crowd. Not my cup of tea, though. They are rather clunky and have that late 70s aesthetic as well as a 70s propensity for lots of switches and knobs. These have a pretty voracious following, though.
The early to mid 80s Super Ferrite era is my favorite, as well as a favorite for many on this thread. Love those SF pickups! Peavey also made these basses really well and didn't fully bow to the trends set by Fender and Gibson, but still did their thing while saluting the inspiration to their basses. The basses weren't so clunky anymore. The hardware used was solid and good quality, the tones and feel are spot on. I feel that the Foundation is a better Jazz Bass. The changes during the later 80s were fine, mostly some cost savings via tuners, knobs and some bridges. The early to mid 90s basses started to cheapen the hardware and shrink the bodies and eventually cheapen the pickups. Still nice, but not 80s nice. I have a 94 Forum Plus that I swapped the pickups and harness. I really like that bass a lot. I strongly feel that Peavey wasn't even making the bodies in the US for the Foundations, Furys, etc... by the early/mid 90s. Nothing wrong with that, just not my cup of tea, again.
Once the Cirrus came out, Peavey was back as a major player. However, this era of Peavey bass is not in my wheelhouse. I'm not into 'fancy' basses.
You might say I'm a fan.
There's 51 of my Peavey basses in this photo, couldn't fit the rest in the room.
View attachment 4064003
When you say Most/Least desired . Is that personally or for somebody planning a collection ?