TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Absolutely. I own multiple basses because of how I'll write on each one. Im in a couple projects and it helps my writing to really embrace the mood of whichever bass I pick up that day. Im gonna write something totally different if I grab my thunderbird and a pick vs grabbing my zon. I was always the same with guitars too.I like the sound of the '77 for sure, but they all sound great, and in the context of a band or mix I don't think you'd notice. So it would just be playing solo. I actually really loved the mellow tones of the '96 and '98. The '77 sounds snappier on all settings and that could be the maple or whatever pickups and pots they used. But I bet you could get something like that from a modern one if you just tried out a bunch. Also, though, if getting a '77 and loving it makes you play more than get one. I think that has to be factored in. Like some instruments just make you want to play more even if it's placebo, and in that case it's worth it b/c you improve so fast. I improved exponentially on my Mag7 PJ bass compared to my MIM P-bass because it was so much easier to play and I liked the tone so much. If the swag of a '77 inspires you that's valid reason for sure!
I like the sound of the '77 for sure, but they all sound great, and in the context of a band or mix I don't think you'd notice. So it would just be playing solo. I actually really loved the mellow tones of the '96 and '98. The '77 sounds snappier on all settings and that could be the maple or whatever pickups and pots they used. But I bet you could get something like that from a modern one if you just tried out a bunch. Also, though, if getting a '77 and loving it makes you play more than get one. I think that has to be factored in. Like some instruments just make you want to play more even if it's placebo, and in that case it's worth it b/c you improve so fast. I improved exponentially on my Mag7 PJ bass compared to my MIM P-bass because it was so much easier to play and I liked the tone so much. If the swag of a '77 inspires you that's valid reason for sure!
Guitar Center Hollywood had the most amazing "vintage" room during this period. Dozens of vintage Rics and Gibson, and probably 100 P and J basses. The room was set up for easy browsing and you could pull anything you wanted to try without having to ask.
Some real firewood in there! But boy, what a candy store.
When the market died down, the collector's room quietly faded down with it.
At that time he was calling his old customers, asking to buy back guitars he sold them in years past. He must have taken a major haircut on some of his instruments post 2009.
Cat relicing can only add value.@bassgirls Also agree with your point that tone is where you find it, and not necessarily related to era.
Here my cats are seen rocking out on a Frankefender -- GC MIM FSR ash body with stock pickup, and a 2001 MIA
neck of a hot-rod PJ. This guitar is as aggressive as any 70's ash and Maple I've heard, and the two guitars it is built from cost a total of $875. Mind you, for that price I also have a WHOLE other bass guitar.
View attachment 2883161 View attachment 2883162
Ouch. Well, as @bassgirls observed, money chases bubbles.
I've flipped quite a few axes "priced to sell" to buyers who clearly could not play,
only to see the instrument marked up a couple hundred back on CL marked up an additional $200
within days. So now even with cheaper gear, non-playing speculators are searching for market inefficiencies
to exploit.
We have kind of an odd place around here that in addition to having a sound studio, sells a lot of ol... uh vintage gear. The owner once told me his primary clientele are the 60 plus crowd who couldn't afford this stuff when they were in their teens/20's.I think I'm in the minority with this opinion, but I dislike vintage gear. It's expensive to buy, but then also expensive to maintain, and you then have to worry about using it and ruining the value. So these aren't really for musicians anymore but collectors, and that's probably why they are being bid up. There is a lot of money sloshing around from all the printing the government did in those QE programs, and that money finds itself into all kinds of things, even vintage basses. If I had one I'd sell it.
Also, I think all the baby boomers dying in the next 10-20 years is bearish for vintage prices. Millennials and GenX can't really afford the prices they want.
I like new instruments, but limited runs. The bass I wound up buying is new but only 500 were made (it's the USA made Magnificent 7 PJ bass). I also bought a Fender Jazzmaster where only 50 where made. I'd rather do that and pay a lot less for just as good an instrument then get involved in vintage (money pit I'd be afraid to use and ruin) and since they're limited in quantity maybe they even appreciate. That's just one girl's opinion, though! To each their own.
The only exception to me are vintage amps because they are really hard to break so I wouldn't fear using it, and they truly do sound better. I never played a vintage bass or guitar that sounded or functioned better than a modern one.
@bassgirls Also agree with your point that tone is where you find it, and not necessarily related to era.
Here my cats are seen rocking out on a Frankefender -- GC MIM FSR ash body with stock pickup, and a 2001 MIA
neck of a hot-rod PJ. This guitar is as aggressive as any 70's ash and Maple I've heard, and the two guitars it is built from cost a total of $875. Mind you, for that price I also have a WHOLE other bass guitar.
View attachment 2883161 View attachment 2883162
I have been browsing the old Fender's in particular and the prices blow me away. Call me naive, call me ignorant but what makes an instrument that was made in the 60's and the 70's cost anything between $2.000 and more than $8.000? Where the electronics made by superior or advanced components? Where the trees from which the wood came any better than those of today? Did the procedure of building a quality instrument not improve? Or is it simply nostalgia of the teenage years that idolizes everything about that era?
This I can understand. I bought those as a kid when they were new. Fun toys!I know a fellow that collects old Star Wars action figures that cost .99 cents back in the day..... He spends hundreds on these lumps of plastic. Go figure...
I have been browsing the old Fender's in particular and the prices blow me away. Call me naive, call me ignorant but what makes an instrument that was made in the 60's and the 70's cost anything between $2.000 and more than $8.000? Where the electronics made by superior or advanced components? Where the trees from which the wood came any better than those of today? Did the procedure of building a quality instrument not improve? Or is it simply nostalgia of the teenage years that idolizes everything about that era?