TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That's a very nice looking bass. The thickness of the top versus the thickness of the back is quite unusual (and cool). Why did you decide on that particular combination/ratio?My new Warwick
Production has been reduced from around 9000 instruments per year, to about 2500 per year.
My new Warwick
I'd argue that the most ergonomic Warwick shape is the Fortress, IMO. It's a shame they don't offer it as a standard German model anymore.
Would it be correct to assume that this is only the ones made in Germany?
... would be interested in trying out a thumb after seeing Jack Bruce and the sound he gets from his fretless thumb.
I've had the opposite experience: the Thumb NT 5 that I owned got absolutely lost in any kind of band setting while the BO 4 I owned was punchy and clear. I spent a few years playing Warwicks (Streamer Stage I plus the aforementioned Thumbs) before I got fed up with the narrow frequency range of most Warwicks (I was always trying to get more bass out of them than they could provide) and was turned off the company by some very bad customer service. If you're a Fender player then you're used to playing an ergonomically-friendly design, something a lot of Warwicks are not. The Thumb and Dolphin are very good examples of a company that often prioritizes style over function. So try them out before committing to anything (and make sure you try them standing as well as sitting, as you might be in for a nasty surprise otherwise).
Ths shows that any good maker can have problems, or even problematic periods in time.
My '03 4003 has been a flawless bass, with one of the most stable necks I have seen on an all-wood bass.
Sure - my 2003 Thumb BO was an excellent bass (the only issue I ever had with it was a broken Just-A-Nut II, which were terrible nuts). But a good company that cares about its customers would have treated me very differently. And notice that our resident Official Warwick Media presence didn't have anything to say about my later post. If I'd posted something similar on the Sadowsky thread you can bet Roger himself would have been the first to respond. :scowl:
lousybassplayer said:Obviously I can't say for sure not seeing that in person, but just from that side shot this thing looks to be head and shoulders above some of the older Warwicks that had initially put me out about the brand in terms of QC. I take it this is not an off the shelf model, but still. These are the Warwicks I see on the internet and such and think I'd love to try one out, but I never have come across one.
I got a Dolphin. It balances perfectly while standing up (it's made for gigs! ), but while sitting, it's best to wear a strap as it still wants to be between your legs....As for Dolphins, have you ever tried playing one sitting down, with it resting on your leg?![]()
azzyrazzy said:I got a Dolphin. It balances perfectly while standing up (it's made for gigs! ), but while sitting, it's best to wear a strap as it still wants to be between your legs....
I always wear a strap, and honestly don't see that as a problem. I want to wear a strap even while sitting and practising, no matter the bass.
scubaduba said:It's a special edition. One of only 40 made. 1" thick Redwood burl over 1" of ash. Quality is superb. Actually it's one of my favorite basses I've ever owned. Love the Bart electronics in it. Maybe a little more compressed but plenty of balls and awesome growl. Takes super low action and the neck is not chunky. Love it.
Here's a couple more pics.