TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Sugar, for me , is probably the most underrated and under appreciated band. Beaster....well...enough said.My friend David Barbe was in Sugar.

That's more like it, much better recording of Periphery. Yeah, that's fairly tight. Don't much care for it, but that's not the point, is it?
Since this thread has to do with "tightness" and some commenters seem to equate that with complexity, I will offer the subjective observation that in my experience the less complex the music and the slower the tempo the more difficult it is for an ensemble to play rhythmically "tight." Speed and complexity can be a crutch.
This^^. TOP is so tight. For an older version that is insanely tight check out Supersax:Tower of Power.
Alot of the Bands I was gonna mention are already spoken for but one band thats tight as ever in this modern age is Brunos Mars's band
I thought you were going to say: "In the middle of the song he fired one band and hired the other band, without missing a beatI saw James Brown once. He had two backup bands on stage. In the Middle of a song he made a cue and one band stopped and without missing a beat the second one started right where the first left off. I never saw anything like it before or sense.
The Derek Trucks band is probably my favorite.
The world's greatest entertainer. Tightness defined.
Hmmm...Kinda of surprised no one mentioned Chicago. I think they were very tight.Union Station...
Lyle Lovett's Large Band...
Thelonius Monk, John Coletrane, Ahmed Abdul-Malik, Shadow Willson (@Carnegie Hall, 1957)
The Joe Jackson Band..
to start with?