• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What do you do about dead spots?

What do you do about dead spots?

  • Ignore them

    Votes: 132 53.9%
  • Replace strings

    Votes: 7 2.9%
  • Replace tuners

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • Replace the bridge

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • Replace the neck

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • Move on to a different bass

    Votes: 42 17.1%
  • Other (specify)

    Votes: 35 14.3%
  • All, as needed.

    Votes: 22 9.0%

  • Total voters
    245
I bought my first bass in 1967, have played continuously since then, and have never had a bass that had more than a barely noticeable deadish spot.

All acoustic instruments have some irregularities, they are not perfectly even, and an electric bass is subject to some of the same physics. If you need a perfectly even scale through the whole range, some kind of electronic keyboard or midi input might be what you need.
 
What do you do about dead Spots?

42e091b56af036f71cfeef5a26c328a0.jpg
 
play other notes.
If you must play dead spots, remember they won't sustain, but as passing notes they work fine still.

enjoy not having them as a side effect of getting different basses in the future, although that was never the reason why I bought a new bass.

Those are everything I've personally done about them.

So I said other, because I didn't see a vote for treat the note differently. That's different from ignoring them... because they affect the sound, so you have to adjust to work with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mili and KaraQ
My grandfather built his third home on a plot setup twenty years prior as a managed Maple “farm(?)” before the lumber company folded. If only he’d had the initiative to set up a three walled building with full range speaker cabinets to playback his Herb Alpert records on infinite repeat from when he built the house in ‘55, the lutherie world would have a nice cache of experimentally musicified maple- some of it probably very curly due to a few of the trees growing on a windy & erosion/mudslide-prone slope.

Alas, the trick in conditioning wood for increased resonance: to expose it to musical-frequency vibrations after it has ceased as part of a living, growing tree; after it has been cut and kiln-dried.

Years ago, I was acquainted with a violin maker retired from a career as a Professor of Audiology (and later Dean of Science) at a major Canadian university. After he'd made a violin or viola, and before he considered it ready for sale, he would attach the ear-buds of a radio tuned to CBC Radio Two (the mostly-music; much-of-it-classical CBC station) to the bridge and play music into it all day every day.

On his insistence, his customers would do A/B comparisons of a new instrument he'd made with any other(s) they'd bring along. I personally witnessed the look of surprise on buyers' faces when asked to pay attention to how sonorous/resonant his instruments were when played. He credited it to his imitation of Stradivarius and to his conditioning of the wood with continuous musical vibrations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MattZilla
You can make a guitar from wood, plexiglass, concrete, or cardboard and resin and they sound pretty much indistinguishable as tests have shown.

1. If it is true that the materials from which solid-body basses are made does not really matter to their sound, then what causes dead spots?

2. The tests you cite showing that the materials from which solid-body basses are made does not really matter to their sound: How scientific are they (e.g. sample size & associated margin of error, controls)? Please provide a hyperlink to their publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
 
1. If it is true that the materials from which solid-body basses are made does not really matter to their sound, then what causes dead spots?

Neck. Even for basses made from plexiglass, the neck tends to be standard construction. Non-standard construction for the neck seems to exhibit different properties, particularly when it is very stiff.

2. The tests you cite showing that the materials from which solid-body basses are made does not really matter to their sound: How scientific are they (e.g. sample size & associated margin of error, controls)? Please provide a hyperlink to their publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

There are some quite scientific ones too, but I haven't organised a set of links so I'd have to Google it all again, which I don't have time for. The stuff on YouTube is less scientific but a lot easier to find.
 
Wherever the deadspot occurs on your G string, hold down the octave below note on your A string. Now play the note on the G and the dead spot is gone. You’ll only need to do this once is a blue moon for something requiring long notes (like a ballad).

Wow, I never thought to try this. This does actually work. My P has that spot really bad, but this trick fixes it well enough that my octaver tracks there again.
I don't know when I would ever employ this trick, mind you, but it does work.
 
Alas, the trick in conditioning wood for increased resonance:

Increased resonance isn't generally what you want in a solid body instrument. It's resonance that leads to dead spots!

to expose it to musical-frequency vibrations after it has ceased as part of a living, growing tree; after it has been cut and kiln-dried.

Years ago, I was acquainted with a violin maker retired from a career as a Professor of Audiology (and later Dean of Science) at a major Canadian university. After he'd made a violin or viola, and before he considered it ready for sale, he would attach the ear-buds of a radio tuned to CBC Radio Two (the mostly-music; much-of-it-classical CBC station) to the bridge and play music into it all day every day.

On his insistence, his customers would do A/B comparisons of a new instrument he'd made with any other(s) they'd bring along. I personally witnessed the look of surprise on buyers' faces when asked to pay attention to how sonorous/resonant his instruments were when played. He credited it to his imitation of Stradivarius and to his conditioning of the wood with continuous musical vibrations.

And where is the scientific testing? Violinists have done A/B comparisons of Strads to modern violins and shown relatively little ability to distinguish them. That and other testing of audiophiles suggests that people aren't as good as they think they are, in general. And then there's wine...
 
Wow, I never thought to try this. This does actually work. My P has that spot really bad, but this trick fixes it well enough that my octaver tracks there again.
I don't know when I would ever employ this trick, mind you, but it does work.

It's what I do. It's not a perfect remedy, but does a decent job when required. That was the great thing about my old Cowpoke with it's shrunken headstock (and thus slightly stiffer neck which tends to move dead spots up) - it was on the 7th fret of the G, or a D, so leaving the D open was all that was required.
 
Tuner configuration seems to affect this. Every 4 string Fender or Squier I've owned had a dead spot on the G string. None of the bases with alternative tumer configurations 2 +2, 3 +1, 3+2, had a easily identifiable dead spot.

Generally, they have shorter headstocks so stiffer necks. As noted, on my Cowpoke (small headstock) it was higher up than standard on a Fender.
 
Random thought in the shower - someone earlier mentioned that you can minimize the dead notes by fretting, but not plucking the note and octave lower on the A string. That does work, what's happening is the lower octave vibrates at its first overtone, which would be the fundamental played on the G string. The G string note still decays quickly, but the A string overtone rings on. So, it's not really the note by itself. It's that particular note played at that particular spot on the neck. C# is dead on the G string, G# is just fine.

I tend to find that if the C on the G string is dead, the same value note played up on the D or A string will also be a little quieter, just not as bad. But that's nearer the anchor point (12th fret is half the scale, but only 1/3 along the neck) so that probably explains the difference. On acoustic guitars dead spots well up the neck are not uncommon, but there the body probably plays more of a role as it's a flat plate resonator. There vibration of that is more wanted as otherwise it would be a very quiet guitar!
 
2. The tests you cite showing that the materials from which solid-body basses are made does not really matter to their sound: How scientific are they (e.g. sample size & associated margin of error, controls)? Please provide a hyperlink to their publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
You mean like your anecdote in post 128?
Sighted tests are worthless for a large number of reasons.
1. What about the testing referred to throughout the column (e.g. by Tobias and Rabe, cited in column 1 paragraph 1)?Where are the experiments by others that come up with the same result?

2. What about the support of the findings reported in column 3 paragraph 2?
 
  • Like
Reactions: -Asdfgh-
Increased resonance isn't generally what you want in a solid body instrument. It's resonance that leads to dead spots!

Actually, among the various solid-body instruments I've played, the more resonant ones have typically sounded best plugged in to amplification, too.

In no surprise to me, those least resonant without amplification also sounded less sonorous when amplified.

That resonance is a factor in the phenomenon of dead spots does not mean that resonance itself is not desirable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mili and ajkula66

Latest posts