1970's Parliament/Funkadelic/Bootsy wasn't funk?
Okay. I know what I'm working with... and strangely enough I was there too.
![]()
I was pretty much with bluewine until this point. These guys along with Sly Stone pretty much epitomize funk for me.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
1970's Parliament/Funkadelic/Bootsy wasn't funk?
Okay. I know what I'm working with... and strangely enough I was there too.
![]()
Omg, not at all. However, good band I guess.
Jerry the bar Kay's didn't pioneer diddly squat.
No offence.
I think most would agree with you. However, I can't. I have a somewhat narrow scope and definition of funk.
Bootsy, I don't know.
I guess he did some stuff as a sideman with James brown and " hanging loose" was funky.
Don't take my comments to seriously. I am a good reference for some of you, especially those that are completely lost.
And I'm not right about everything I've said.
I would say I'm dead on point with about 80% of it.
And my position and comments are just my opinion.
Zoa said:I was pretty much with bluewine until this point. These guys along with Sly Stone pretty much epitomize funk for me.
I was pretty much with bluewine until this point. These guys along with Sly Stone pretty much epitomize funk for me.
Brad Johnson said:Now my curiousity is piqued. Early Parliament/Funkadelic no, Bootsy maybe, over the hill Sly yes? What else fits in your narrow scope.
Brad Johnson said:You're not wrong, they are after all opinions.
Which shows that the idea that this is simple to determine couldn't be more offbase.
![]()
That's fine, your not the only one they fooled.
They actually came on the scene rather late in the came.
Some here will agree that they were way over the top on production ( space ships and guys playing in diapers ) and if you saw a live show, can you honestly say they were tight.
Think about it, how can any band be musically tight when you have more people on stage than in the audience.
Well, I would say at some level some of what were trying to define is basic and simple and some of it is very complex.
Brad Johnson said:Now my curiousity is piqued. Early Parliament/Funkadelic no, Bootsy maybe, over the hill Sly yes? What else fits in your narrow scope.
I'm not sure.
I have always liked and thought Roco Prestia was one of the funkiest cats to ever walk the earth.
Brad Johnson said:The early 70's was late?
For me yes, to a degree. I was huge dyke & the blazers fan as well as baby Huey & the baby sitters.
They didn't always have the stage show and diapers. Maybe that's coloring your recollection.
You might be right. That stuff was corny for me.
"Up For the Down Stroke"?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i01fYbRQjWM
BTW funk does not have to be tight. It can be loose too.
Brad Johnson said:How can you not be sure what you think fits... after all, it's what you thinkLD. Or is this just about the things that you think don't fit?
I've always dug TOP immensely since "You're Still a Young Man" came out. The cool thing about the funk I came up on was that even chops like Rocco's weren't needed or required. Definitely didn't need what most would consider good vocals either. It was about the ensemble and the song.
You know, 20 years from now, there will be a TV commercial for sun tan lotion and the background music will be "hot fun in the summer time"
I am not sure Parliament will have stood the test of time that well. I'm not sure.

It was about a lot of things, politically, philosophically and sexually.
Blue