Sure, I'm not doubting this; but what I was trying to get across is that, from the venue's perspective, not every band is as strong a success as you're having with Redhead. They're looking to hire bands for, say, eight nights a month, and presumably don't want the same band playing all eight nights. Supposing they want, ideally, a six-week rotation between the same band coming back; that's 12 bands they need in the rotation. Will they ALL be as good for business as Redhead is? What if they have, maybe, 10 bands in their market that are that good; the other two slots they're trying out new and uncertain acts; and then maybe one of the 10 good ones breaks up, and a couple of months later another... I can see how, from the venue's perspective, it's a difficult and uncertain area of business. That's the point I was trying to make.
Yes, absolutely. We rotate through eight or nine clubs, much as you describe. We do draw better than most, and our take-home pay reflects that. I should add that our BL is out in the clubs 3-4 nights a week, checking out the competition. The issue around here isn't bands breaking up; it's that they're still playing the same damn sets they were playing 10 years ago. As I've posted before, in addition to gigging with us, she runs two open-mics during the week. Many who show up at those show up at our weekend gigs. It's nice.
