Correct me if I am wrong but shouldn't it be baked in the absence of oxygen? I thought the idea was to modify the wood at the cellular level and not cook (slow burn) it.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Correct me if I am wrong but shouldn't it be baked in the absence of oxygen? I thought the idea was to modify the wood at the cellular level and not cook (slow burn) it.
Is there a risk of warping as the roasted wood reabsorbs moisture from the air? Or does the roasting process prevent that? Or do you have to seal it before it gets the chance?
I’m annoyed I got rid of my little oven now, I could have done some experiments!
Those look great! You may have seen some of my adventures in home roasting here as well. My findings are in line with what you've noted too. Dimensions shrunk on all the pieces I've done. As much as 1/8" on an 8" wide board. One thing I've found is that the oven roasting process seems to do something to the oils in the wood, because the routing dust they make is really fine, but there's an oiliness to them, kind of like soot has. I've also noticed that if the wood has a cup, bend, warp, check, it gets accentuated by the roasting process.Some roasted maple!
A while back I purchased a mini oven to bake paint but with all the new maple in my life I figured I would try using it for roasting that too. The small piece one the right is hard maple and the flame piece is big leaf. The big leaf got considerably darker after a couple of hours at 190 C:
View attachment 4033710
Then I hit half of each piece with a coat of tung oil and you can really see how dark it is relative to the un-roasted piece one the top:
View attachment 4033712
Keep in mind the camera doesn't capture the true color. In real life the roasted flame is a medium brown, less dark than walnut, but it clearly very dark compared to un-roasted maple. The flame figure is at least as dramatic after baking, but again, the camera did not capture the chatoyance well at all. It looks pretty amazing really. The hard maple is more of a reddish brown. Interesting.
"Roasting" wood, for the good results involves a pressure vessel , and necessitates the absence of oxygen.Those look great! You may have seen some of my adventures in home roasting here as well. My findings are in line with what you've noted too. Dimensions shrunk on all the pieces I've done. As much as 1/8" on an 8" wide board. One thing I've found is that the oven roasting process seems to do something to the oils in the wood, because the routing dust they make is really fine, but there's an oiliness to them, kind of like soot has. I've also noticed that if the wood has a cup, bend, warp, check, it gets accentuated by the roasting process.
The wood seems to get a little stiffer too but also becomes more brittle. I've cut some thin 5mm square strips and bent them until they broke to compare to unburnt wood. They break with around the same amount of pressure, but the burnt ones deflect less while being bent, and shatter/crack off abruptly rather than splintering like the unroasted.
Another thing I've noticed with walnut in particular is after roasting, I can sand it up to 2500 grit and polish it like a much harder hardwood. In my case, this helps me keep my wood species to domestics and local woods in my builds.![]()
"Roasting" wood, for the good results involves a pressure vessel , and necessitates the absence of oxygen.
Torrefaction - Wikipedia
You are oven baking the maple without pressure, and in the presence of oxygen
You are making coffee grounds, or pre charcoal.
There is little to be gained by roasting in the open air, unless you are hardening a spear , or a viking making a boat .
The torrefaction process involves baking wood in an oxygen free environment at temperatures higher than conventional timber seasoning kilns. Taken to its logical conclusion you would end up with charcoal but stopped short, the wood merely darkens depending on how long it has been roasted.
I can't find the article, my takeaway is: Absence of oxygen , under pressure, patricularly inert gas prevents / reduces the breakdown of the cellulose to carbon.Well, yes. Torrefaction is generally done at atmospheric pressure, just without oxygen. And yes, if you get the temperature high enough to start oxidation and oxygen is present then the oxygen will effectively burn the carbon and eventually you end up with ash.
Even without oxygen, at high temperatures you are basically making coal. Also not the best stuff to make instruments from.
But at temperatures where pryolysis happens but oxidization does not, you get the benefits of the heat treatment without making charcoal. This image shows the idea:
Pyrolysis - Wikipedia
So you get the benefits of slightly reduced weight with better stability and deeper color (if that is desireable).

I also postulate that the dryer the wood is at the start of the process would show profound differences, especially in regards to the destructive off gassing.Yep, I've read several articles on it and the official processes, but following the literally hundreds of examples of home roasted woods, I tried my own, and I'd call it successful. Perhaps there are some concerns about it being partially burnt, but in practice in a guitar or bass, there do not appear to be any drawbacks, only gains. Like hawt, hawt lumber from pieces that weren't so hot before. I've built three necks now with burnt walnut fingerboards, and can't see any difference structurally between them and unroasted walnut boards. The roasted ones polish up beautifully and have a rich chatoyance in addition to the darker colour compared to unroasted pieces.![]()