• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

When to Start Composing?

I want to start composing some solo instrumental songs. I am aware that it could take me a while (maybe years) to make anything halfway decent and that this is a life-long journey. I’m planning on starting with simple stuff and working up to more complex stuff as I get more knowledgeable and experienced.

I will be honest, I do not have a strong ear and I only have a basic understanding of music theory. I have a bunch of music theory resources and ear training exercises lined up, as I know how important these skills are for a composer to have. However, this leaves me questioning when I should start composing...

Should I wait until I get a better understanding of theory (such as knowing the theory behind writing melodies, harmonies, and counterpoint voicings) and I have a decent ear; or should I start composing right away and improve my theory knowledge and ear as I go?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jamro217
The most important commodities any composer can have, regardless of how technically proficient they may be, are Ideas, Inspiration, and Desire. You want to start composing? by all means do it now. The knowledge will come in time. But the ideas are precious, so take advantage of them as soon as you can.
 
Here's some more encouragement for you to start composing now. It took me years to come into my own, but I've been able to turn it into an income stream over the past three years. My most often-used technique is singing ideas into my phone or tascam, and transcribing it later. Pick up Musescore and spend some time learning to notate, and use audacity or Garageband to record things. Best of luck!
 
I’d advise to start now as well. The theory and other stuff can come later, and ideas are more important. Two of the most important parts of composition don’t require music theory at all. First is the repetition of key melodic or rhythmic figures, and the use of call-and-response of those figures.

The first 30 seconds of Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony are all about repetition and call-and-response. Of course, it’s a Classical composition and there’s more than just those techniques, but every form of popular music uses exactly the same set of general tools, from Miles to the Sex Pistols to Bruno Mars.
 
Here's some more encouragement for you to start composing now. It took me years to come into my own, but I've been able to turn it into an income stream over the past three years. My most often-used technique is singing ideas into my phone or tascam, and transcribing it later. Pick up Musescore and spend some time learning to notate, and use audacity or Garageband to record things. Best of luck!

Thanks! I already have some recordings on my phone for me transcribe, so I guess I can get around to transcribing them now. I’ll also try to force myself to try and record more things.

I’ll look into Musescore, I think I have guitar pro on my PC which I believe has notating software, but I’ll have to double-check that.

My plan is to use my voice or bass to come up with the various melodies and then transcribe them into FL Studio (for now at least) to sequence the various instruments, which would include a bass track. Once I have it all figured out, I’ll export it all (minus the bass track) and use Audacity to record my live bassline against it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skwee
I’d advise to start now as well. The theory and other stuff can come later, and ideas are more important. Two of the most important parts of composition don’t require music theory at all. First is the repetition of key melodic or rhythmic figures, and the use of call-and-response of those figures.

The first 30 seconds of Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony are all about repetition and call-and-response. Of course, it’s a Classical composition and there’s more than just those techniques, but every form of popular music uses exactly the same set of general tools, from Miles to the Sex Pistols to Bruno Mars.

That’s good to know. I’m actually planning on composing instrumental prog rock with an influence from classical (symphonies especially), so my pieces will eventually be somewhat more complicated (though no where as near as complicated as an actual symphony because I will have a lot more repetition), but I’m going to start composing very basic stuff and slowly work my way up over the years.

I’m also going to study a lot of classical music and some beginner to intermediate classical theory to try and understand various techniques. I have some resources for this and will also learn by era, starting in baroque.

Also, my understanding of theory and composition is really low at the moment, so I have to ask... What exactly is “call-and-response”?

Thanks!
 
That’s good to know. I’m actually planning on composing instrumental prog rock with an influence from classical (symphonies especially), so my pieces will eventually be somewhat more complicated (though no where as near as complicated as an actual symphony because I will have a lot more repetition), but I’m going to start composing very basic stuff and slowly work my way up over the years.

I’m also going to study a lot of classical music and some beginner to intermediate classical theory to try and understand various techniques. I have some resources for this and will also learn by era, starting in baroque.

Also, my understanding of theory and composition is really low at the moment, what exactly is “call-and-response?”

Thanks!

Call and response doesn’t always have a lot to do with music - it’s just an audio event that states a theme, followed by another one, that make a statement when combined. You could hear wolves or coyotes do this in the desert all night long. Musically, lots of riffs are simple call-and-response affairs. If you take the Hendrix tune “Purple Haze”, the first four notes of the famous guitar riff are a “call” and the last four are a “response”. They’re different sets of notes that make a statement (or riff) when combined. You’ll also notice that each set of four notes in that riff fall in the same rhythmic pattern, which is repetition at work. It can get more complicated, but lots of great music can be broken down into these simple parts.

If you study composition seriously in the future, you absolutely will hear these terms again because they’re that important. Essentially, it’s part of what the human brain and ear recognize as strong statements that make musical sense. Take whatever your favorite song is now and see if the artist uses these devices. He or she probably does.
 
Last edited:
Call and response doesn’t always have a lot to do with music - it’s just an audio event that states a theme, followed by another one, that make a statement when combined. You could hear coyotes do this in the desert all night long. Musically, lots of riffs are simple call-and-response affairs. If you take the Hendrix tune “Purple Haze”, the first four notes are a “call” and the last four are a “response”. They’re different sets of notes that make a statement (or riff) when combined. You’ll also notice that each set of four notes in that riff fall in the same rhythmic pattern, which is repetition at work. It can get more complicated, but lots of great music can be broken down into these simple parts.

If you study composition seriously in the future, you absolutely will hear these terms again because they’re that important. Essentially, it’s part of what the human brain and ear recognize as strong statements that make musical sense. Take whatever your favorite song is now and see if the artist uses these devices. He or she probably does.

That’s interesting, and good to know! For some reason, the riff of Purple Haze isn’t coming to me, but I’ll listen to it tomorrow just to give me a better understanding. Thanks again!
 
Use whatever tools you possess right now to start. As you progress, your music will get better and more mature. Just because you know theory doesn't automatically make you a good composer and vice versa. You may hear masterpieces in your head and struggle with the notation or even understand how they work. That is what songwriting and composing are all about: your ideas. I think they asked Sir Paul that question once. His reply was another hit song. "Yesterday". :smug:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthew_84
Knowing music theory is not really that crucial for composing, experience with what ideas works together is though, which is why I would advise you to start composing at once.

You can't read in a book how to make a great composition, you can find useful advise though, and knowing some theory will be a great supportive tool.

Not having a particular good ear is of course not going to make composing easier for you, but you will not get any better at composing before you actually start to do it and get some real experience with what works and what doesn't.

Just don't give up, you should probably not expect to compose anything worthwhile the first long while, but everything you do compose, no matter the actual quality of it will gradually get you closer, give you a better idea and sense of what works and what doesn't and more and more useful experience for each composition.

Also you might want to experiment with composing using a computer program to write music (programming music as it is usually called, though it has little to do with traditional computer programming).

The reason why I suggest this is that I at least find you get a much better structural overview and general clearer picture and idea of what you are actually doing, plus you will be able to move around with individual sections of the composition and make whatever changes you might wish easily as you go along and play them back instantly to check out if what you did works.

This will make experimenting and exploring your ideas and possibilities in a trial and error kind of way that all new creative challenges kind of require a pretty huge deal easier.

Also using this approach will make you develop a more visual and graphical sense of your compositions which might be in your favor since your ear is not the best.

All DAWs(*1) has a midi sequencer(*2) build in and it is possible to find fairly decent free VST(*3) instruments for download on the internet.

(*1)-(Digital Audio Workstation, a music production tool that can be used both to write, record and edit music)

(*2)-(A grid with a piano roll on the side for plotting in your notes as bars (not bars as in the sense of sections of 4/4 or whatever, but small graphical bars representing notes) which you can adjust to be as long or as short you want for setting the duration of the individual notes, as well as you also will have the option of choosing the exact volume at which each individual note is played back)

(*3)-(A specific type of small app like programs that can be run from a DAW, either emulating an effect machine or emulating an instrument using samples that can be programmed via the midi sequencer or the virtual music sheet build into the DAW).

If you feel like investing in a proper VST sampler that got all the instruments you need, including drums and whole drum sets, with samples in an outstanding quality non of the free VST instruments can really match, I would recommend Native Intruments Kontakt 5.

The stand alone, non VST music production program Reason might also be an option to consider, though I find it more suited for composing electronic music.

As DAW, if you do not already own and use one, I can warmly recommend Reaper, which is free but has all the features that you will need and find in more expensive DAWs.

Using Reaper and VST instruments as your platform for composing you get both the option for writing in standard notation via the build in virtual music sheet or using the midi sequencer to program the music.

No matter if you chose to write your compositions using standard notation or you use the sequencer you will be able to see how it looks in either format, as well as you can also chose to swap between both methods while composing.

Further more you will be able spice up the instrument samples by applying VST effects to your individual instrument tracks.
 
Last edited:
Theory is invaluable and is strongly recommended, but many of the greatest musical 'hooks' were created by people with no theory knowledge whatsoever. Think of riffs in songs like Satisfaction, Day Tripper, etc. Written by guys with no understanding of theory. Accept that probably the first hundred things you write will be crap. But that's how you learn, so write the crap pieces anyway. Don't wait to start until you think you're "ready". If you do, you'll never get going; start when you feel you can't wait any longer. If everybody waited to have kids until they were "ready", we'd be an endangered species. You have to jump in with both feet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthew_84
I want to start composing some solo instrumental songs. I am aware that it could take me a while (maybe years) to make anything halfway decent and that this is a life-long journey. I’m planning on starting with simple stuff and working up to more complex stuff as I get more knowledgeable and experienced.

I will be honest, I do not have a strong ear and I only have a basic understanding of music theory. I have a bunch of music theory resources and ear training exercises lined up, as I know how important these skills are for a composer to have. However, this leaves me questioning when I should start composing...

Should I wait until I get a better understanding of theory (such as knowing the theory behind writing melodies, harmonies, and counterpoint voicings) and I have a decent ear; or should I start composing right away and improve my theory knowledge and ear as I go?
Start now
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthew_84
Thanks everyone, I’ll get cracking!

@TuneSalad666 I appreciate your advice. I actually own FL Studio which is a sequencer that uses VST instruments. The sequencer has a piano roll feature (I guess similar to a self-playing (grand?) piano) so you can choose exactly when a note starts and ends, as well as volume and a whole bunch of other things. I’ve used it throughout the years and have become decent with it. I have some melodies sung into my phone and few jotted down on notation paper, but the majority of my ideas are programmed into FL Studio.

It does not have a notation feature though, so I may dabble with Reaper if I feel I need it. I’m not sure I will use need to use notation much as I put most of my ideas into FL Studio, which will also be what I use to create my digital tracks to record my bass over, but it’s good to know there are other options out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bassbeater