• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Who is your favorite rhythm section?

I would just assume that most bands would have learned to function as a whole.
Not having "sections"
Bands have always functioned as a whole. Some instruments provide melodic/harmonic parts/elements of that whole. Some instruments provide rhythmic elements. That's called a rhythm section. If you have an example of drums or bass playing the lead melody, if love to hear it (not really). But I don't take offence to the delineation of sections - if anything, the notion highlights the roles within 'the whole' and acknowledges the importance of those roles. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoCal1
Yes, they do.
Yes, it does.

Yep, it does. Listen to any hack play acoustic covers that don't sound right. The chords are there, the words are there, but the rhythm (ie. 'Rhythm section') isn't. You can't generate the appropriate rhythm without a bass and/or drummer. (Possibly with the exception of pop punk ;) )
Rhythm sections are made up of "rhythm instruments...Guitars and keyboards are considered rhythm instruments...Yes...many rock bands consist primarily of rhythm instruments, therefore, the entire band would be considered as a rhythm section (or ensemble) like The Who...Daltry and Townsend would be part of the rhythm "section" or ensemble since they're certainly not brass, woodwind, or string players...Bands like Chicago or Tower of Power contain rhythm sections AND horn sections...true dat...Bass drum duo's are just that...they are NOT sections in and of themselves unless they are the ONLY rhythm instruments in an ensemble any more than just the small and power forward are the frontcourt on a basketball team...So is the center...7 pages or 100 pages of misinformation does not make it right...Sorry...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jhengsman
Rhythm sections are made up of "rhythm instruments...Guitars and keyboards are considered rhythm instruments...Yes...many rock bands consist primarily of rhythm instruments, therefore, the entire band would be considered as a rhythm section (or ensemble) like The Who...Daltry and Townsend would be part of the rhythm "section" or ensemble...Bands like Chicago or Tower of Power contain rhythm sections AND horn sections...true dat...Bass drum duo's are just that...they are NOT sections in and of themselves...7 pages or 100 pages of misinformation does not make it right and more than the 720 pages of mein Kampf makes IT right...Sorry...
You're speaking in the context of an orchestral lineup. If someone names a drummer/bassist combo, whether I agree or not, I know what they're talking about. Anything beyond that is semantics and taking the fun out of taking the time to appreciate the groovers who do/did it well. Krist and Dave were brilliant together, as are Chad and Flea, I might add. Have a good day mate. :)
 
THIS!
This is an antiquated term.
From the days of Big Band.
When they had a horn and rhythm section.

Jazz band
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
50px-Question_book-new.svg.png


350px-West_Point_Band_Jazz_Knights.jpg


A jazz band (jazz ensemble or jazz combo) is a musical ensemble that plays jazz music. Jazz bands vary in the quantity of its members and the style of jazz that they play but it is common to find a jazz band made up of a rhythm section and a horn section.
Not just from big bands...in any traditional jazz setting up to and including today, the classical rhythm section is considered to be piano, bass, and drums (a la Nat King Cole)...occasionally guitar, bass and drums (like Wes Montgomery worked with)...and sometimes, piano (or organ) , guitar, bass and drums (much more common...
 
You're speaking in the context of an orchestral lineup. If someone names a drummer/bassist combo, whether I agree or not, I know what they're talking about. Anything beyond that is semantics and taking the fun out of taking the time to appreciate the groovers who do/did it well. Krist and Dave were brilliant together, as are Chad and Flea, I might add. Have a good day mate. :)
What you call "grooving", I call "locking" between a bass and drummer...Rocco and Garibaldi, Jamerson and Benny Benjamin, Rainey and Purdie, Bruce and Baker are some of the best at this locking technique...Entwistle and Moon...not so much...Both tremendous players...but they tended to work against each other (with great success) more as soloists playing together than a bass and drum locking with each other (now I'll REALLY get it from WHO fanatics LOL)...A very famous Tommy Dorsey recording..."Well Git It" featured a trumpet dual between Chuck Peterson and Ziggy Ellman...Those guys wailed back and forth and played off each other...yet those two did NOT constitute a "horn section"...
 
Not just from big bands...in any traditional jazz setting up to and including today, the classical rhythm section is considered to be piano, bass, and drums (a la Nat King Cole)...occasionally guitar, bass and drums (like Wes Montgomery worked with)...and sometimes, piano (or organ) , guitar, bass and drums (much more common...
By that definition,ALL of the music bands I listen to are.by definition,"rhythm sections!"
But then...a "section" of what?

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]section

[sek-shuh n]
noun
1.
a part that is cut off or separated.
So bands that don't have a horn section are by default still a "section"?
 
Last edited:
Mickey Dolenz and Peter Tork :)
or how about:

Dave Holland and Jack DeJohnette
Eddie Gomez & Steve Gadd
Ron Carter & Tony Williams
Marc Johnson & Peter Erskine
Tom Fowler & Chester Thompson
Tony Levin & Bill Bruford
Mike Rutherford & Phil Collins
 
What you call "grooving", I call "locking" between a bass and drummer...Rocco and Garibaldi, Jamerson and Benny Benjamin, Rainey and Purdie, Bruce and Baker are some of the best at this locking technique...Entwistle and Moon...not so much...Both tremendous players...but they tended to work against each other (with great success) more as soloists playing together than a bass and drum locking with each other (now I'll REALLY get it from WHO fanatics LOL)...A very famous Tommy Dorsey recording..."Well Git It" featured a trumpet dual between Chuck Peterson and Ziggy Ellman...Those guys wailed back and forth and played off each other...yet those two did NOT constitute a "horn section"...
You're missing my point. Chad and Flea don't necessarily lock with each other either. My interpretation of a rhythm section is pretty basic - they play the foundations, both rhythmic and tonal, of a song - from which, other parts can extrapolate, play with, against, solo, add to in any way that doesn't change those foundations. In a band with a single guitarist, I don't feel the guitar is necessarily a rhythm instrument. It can play lead, it also plays in the upper range of available frequencies explored in that context. I feel like it's maybe akin to trumpet as far as its role in the arrangement, which is what I'm getting at. Without an abundance of lead instruments in a three-piece arrangement, the guitar has extra responsibilities, however subtle, other than rhythm, so I wouldn't include in that context.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: descendent22
By that definition,ALL of the music bands I listen to are.by definition,"rhythm sections!"
But then...a "section" of what?

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]section

[sek-shuh n]
noun
1.
a part that is cut off or separated.
So you're saying that Geddy and Peart, Garibaldi and Prestia, McCartney and Ringo, Wyman and Watts, Ronnie Baker and Earl Young are "cut off from the rest of the band? What did they do...make them go play outside? I've been in more recording sessions than I need to remember, and while I have on occasion seen the drummer partitioned from the rest of the ensemble in a separate booth...I've never seen the bassist in the booth with the drummer:bassist:...But as I initially said... this is a terrific thread for bass/drum duos, and rhythm ensembles are occasionally mentioned...but most of the responses are just not rhythm "sections", although I also can't determine how many of the responders have ever played a recording session either......
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tbasstreble11
So you're saying that Geddy and Peart, Garibaldi and Prestia, McCartney and Ringo, Wyman and Watts, Ronnie Baker and Earl Young are "cut off from the rest of the band? What did they do...make them go play outside? I've been in more recording sessions than I need to remember, and while I have on occasion seen the drummer partitioned from the rest of the ensemble in a separate booth...I've never seen the bassist in the booth with the drummer:bassist:
Sorry.I was editing my last post when you responded.
I added the question."So bands that don't have a horn section are by default still a "section?"
The question remains "Why is it called a "section"?
 
Last edited:

Latest posts