You totally missed the point of my post. Also your emotional response shows that your view is driven by...EMOTION AND NOT FACT. I never stated what my opinion was or who I think was more influential, better, etc. Plus I read this entire thread prior to posting. I pointed out that all of the top bass players that I have met (and I have met many) were influenced by Jaco, many felt he changed the game and none hold the Ox in the same regard you do. They never even mentioned him in any way, shape or form. That is a Fact. Its like asking Lebron James who's had more impact on the game of basketball, who advanced it more Magic or Jordan. Lebron's opinion is going to hold more weight than some guy in the stands because he is walking that same road as they did. Trying to get to the same place as they did. He has intimate knowledge through experience that you or I could not possibly possess. So YES, you have a right to your opinion, everybody does. I just feel that their view does and should carry considerably more weight than yours or mine. We do not have the experience or ability that they do (well, maybe you do, I do not.). If we did we would be touring, recording, etc not posting in this sillier by the post thread. "FACTS ARE STUBBORN THINGS". You really sound like a "Monday morning quarterback".
After posting a list of facts, I really cannot get how you can think my view is driven by emotion, but to each his own. Can we evaluate different bass players with facts? No, but we can surely contrast them! I don't care if you appreciate Entwistle the same way I did or not, that would be emotional, because the thing is, it would be naive to say he's
contributed less to the bass playing world than Jaco, because
by history he has contributed more. Besides, the whole bass celebrity thing is a game of chance more than anything else.
They're there because they are the correct moment, in the correct day, etc etc. Don't get me wrong, I'm not nullifying their talent, but most of the time, talent alone will not get you that far. I'm sure there's a bunch of killer players that never get the spotlight, that would rival by far most celebrities nowadays. However, to think their opinion is not worth as much because they're not famous is silly, and I apply it to every bassist, virtuoso or not, known or not, because an opinion is an opinion, and just because you don't know about his past experience, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Likewise, I feel the same about people not holding John dearly. It's not about loving him, or having him as a favorite, certainly isn't mine, it's about knowing about history and acknowledging his achievements when commenting bout something related to the matter. If you don't know anything about the holocaust, does it mean it didn't happen? Furthermore, if you didn't know about the holocaust, does it mean you can't know about Vietnam? Or have a solid opinion on modern warfare? Of course not. The point being is that, Entwistle influenced the bass world more than they did, and that's a
fact. Whether they acknowledge it or not, is not my problem, and it certainly doesn't make their opinion dumbfounded.
I like Chris Barker more than Jaco, and he's certainly influenced me more. Doesn't mean he magically contributed more to the bass world, he's just my preference. However, if we're talking about history, which has to be validate by nature, then you can only lead yourself with truth is that, whether people find Jaco more interesting/influencing/crazier/sexier is doesn't matter because by history, he just didn't do as much as Entwistle.
Also,
You totally missed the point of my post. Also your emotional response shows that your view is driven by...EMOTION AND NOT FACT.
If we did we would be touring, recording, etc not posting in this sillier by the post thread. "FACTS ARE STUBBORN THINGS". You really sound like a "Monday morning quarterback".